Skip to content

· Private foundation

Helmut Kiffmann Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1.0M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

99% of Helmut Kiffmann Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The San Diego Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Helmut Kiffmann Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $1M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
’20
6
’21
4
’22
5
’23
10
’24
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$3.0MHousing & Shelter$117kHealth$98kInternational$48kYouth Development$37kPhilanthropy$31kReligion$30kFood & Nutrition$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $83k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.3M
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER$1,010,000
YMCA$262,000
CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS$50,000
DOORS OF CHANGE$28,000
ST PAULS SENIOR SERVICES$25,000
COMPUTERS FOR KIDS$10,000
AMERICAN MOLDOVAN JEWISH FEDERATION$10,000
SEEDS OF HOPE$10,000
URBAN RESTORATION COUNSELING CENTER$5,000
EQUATION COLLABORATIVE CORP$5,000
SAINT ANDREWS LUTHERAN CHURCH$5,000
END OF LIFE CHOICES$5,000
SAN DIEGUITO UNITED METHODIST CHURC$3,000
ALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SEEDS OF HOPE: $10k → 14%COMPUTERS FOR KIDS: $10k → 16%SEEDS OF HOPE: $10k → 14%COMPUTERS FOR KIDS: $10k → 16%HOLLY HOUSE FOR KIDS: $5k → 9%SEEDS OF HOPE: $10k → 14%SEEDS OF HOPE: $8k → 14%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $500k → 14%SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE: $14k → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $1.0M → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $1.0M → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $50k → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $6k → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 13 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
11

Total granted

$3.3M
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+8%

Still filing today

46%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthHousing & ShelterEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +110%
  • DO
    Doors of Change
    5× · 2020–2024 · $90k · revenue +2%
  • SO
    SEEDS OF HOPE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $38k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • SF
    SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $14k · revenue +8%
  • CC
    CENTURY CLUB
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • GR
    GIRLS RISING
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dreams for Change Inc

Dreams for Change's mission is to respond to the needs of San Diegans by creating innovative and cost-effective programs to empower and stabilize the lives of under-served families and individuals.

Human Services
2
Homes for California Dba Homes for Sonoma

Homes for Sonoma is a nonprofit developer creating quality workforce housing options that support safe and sustainable community, and finds efficient, scalable solutions to address the housing crisis in Sonoma County and throughout…

Housing & Shelter
3
Family Promise of Santa Clarita Valley

With assistance of volunteers from the community and faith groups, the organization works to assist homeless children and their families to achieve sustainable independence, while offering hope, compassion, and preserving individual…

Housing & Shelter
4
San Diego Community Housing Corporation

To increase, preserve and improve quality affordable housing opportunities for working families.

Housing & Shelter
5
New Door Opportunities

Feeding the homeless population in san d

Food & Nutrition
6
San Diego Hunger Coalition

San diego hunger coalition works collaboratively with community partners to create equitable access to food assistance through research, education, and advocacy.

Food & Nutrition
7
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
8
North Coast Christian Ministries Inc Dba Hope for San Diego

Hope for San Diego raises awareness, engages volunteers and provides financial and other tangible resources to organizations serving the poor and marginalized in the greater San Diego area.

Human Services
9
Contra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing Inc

Hope Solutions provides permanent affordable housing coupled with well-executed support services to people who are homeless or at risk to become homeless in Contra Costa County. Support services are individualized for each person or family…

Housing & Shelter
10
San Diego Housing Federation

The Federation brings together representatives of affordable housing community development corporations with others interested in the development and management of housing for low and moderate income persons in San Diego County to mutually…

Education
11
The Samaritan Center-Simi Valley

The mission of the Samaritan Center-Simi Valley is to offer people experiencing housing and food insecurity supportive services essential to human dignity.

Housing & Shelter
12
Change Is Possible (Chips) Inc

Provide shelter and court advocacy for victims of domestic violence.

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Resource Center; the most unlike its peers is Urban Restoration Counselling. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $3,036,407 · PhilanthropyTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATIONCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $2,572,936 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER+5 more: $87,278 · Human ServicesYMCA: $350,900 · OtherYMCAST PAULS SENIOR SERVICES: $70,000 · OtherST PAULS …COASTAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherCOASTAL C…GIRLS ON THE RUN: $27,000 · Other+16 more: $82,000 · Other+16 moreDoors of Change: $90,000 · Housing & ShelterCENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS: $85,000 · HealthUrban Restoration Counselling: $5,000 · HealthHEALTHY DAY PARTNERS: $6,064 · EnvironmentEQUATION COLLABORATIVE CORP: $5,000 · Food & NutritionProduceGood: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$3,036,407Human Services$2,660,214Other$559,900Housing & Shelter$90,000Health$90,000Environment$6,064Food & Nutrition$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $3,036,407 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $2,572,936 over 6y, 13% of budgetDoors of Change: $90,000 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS: $85,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSEEDS OF HOPE INC: $38,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetCOASTAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCOMPUTERS FOR KIDS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetSOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC: $14,278 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGIRLS RISING: $10,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetHEALTHY DAY PARTNERS: $6,064 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetUrban Restoration Counselling: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSister League of San Diego Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetEQUATION COLLABORATIVE CORP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHolly House for Kids: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetProduceGood: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Doors of Change ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds SEEDS OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMPUTERS FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS RISING ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY DAY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds Urban Restoration Counselling ↗
  • Who funds Sister League of San Diego Inc ↗
  • Who funds EQUATION COLLABORATIVE CORP ↗
  • Who funds Holly House for Kids ↗
  • Who funds ProduceGood ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego FoundationCA26.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Sempra Foundation · Leichtag Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · The Country Friends · Boys and Girls Aid Society of San Diego Ltd · Alliance Healthcare Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · The Bravo Foundation · Allison and Robert Price Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Helmut Kiffmann Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Helmut Kiffmann Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Helmut Kiffmann Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Helmut Kiffmann Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Helmut Kiffmann Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph