Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Heller Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$222k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$477kEducation$268kArts & Culture$195kHousing & Shelter$142kCivil Rights$60kEmployment$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $177k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$206k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION$120,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$56,500
NORTH COUNTY LBGTQ RESOURSE$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC$10,000
BE WELL THERAPY (YOGA FOR CANCER)$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%D'VINE PATH: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$893k · 7 repeat orgs$195k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

$893k
$155k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+95%

Still filing today

71%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    Mainly Mozart Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $155k · revenue +31%
  • SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2022 · $150k · revenue +45%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST
    5× · 2017–2022 · $140k · revenue +104%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ARC OF SAN DIEGO
    one grant, 2023 · $80k · revenue -8%
  • NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +132%
  • NC
    NORTH COUNTY LGBTQ RESOURSE
    one grant, 2024 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of San Diego

The university of san diego is a contemporary catholic university, grounded in the liberal arts and anchored along an international border, advancing academic excellence to create a more inclusive, sustainable and hopeful world.

2
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
3
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
4
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

5
National University

To deliver accessible world-class student experiences by providing quality programs and services that ensure student success through meaningful learning. to be an inclusive and innovative university serving life-long learners who…

Education
6
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
7
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
8
Scripps College

To educate women to develop their intellect and talents through active participation in a community of scholars, so that as graduates they may contribute to society through public and private lives of leadership, service, integrity and…

Education
9
Arcadia University

Arcadia university's pioneering, global, integrated, liberal arts, and professional learning experience cultivates leaders who are intellectually fearless and uniquely prepared for life and work. our highly regarded, values-based learning…

Education
10
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
The University of British Columbia

Pursuing excellence in research learning and engagement to foster global citizenship and advance a sustainable and just society across British Columbia Canada and the world.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of the Pacific and the most unlike its peers is DVine Path Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD — $246,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODNORTH COUNTY LBGTQ RESOURSE — $30,000 · OtherNORTH COUNTY LBGTQ RESOURSENORTH COUNTY LGBTQ RESOURSE — $20,000 · OtherNORTH COUNTY LGBTQ RESOURSENORTH COUNTY LGBTQ RESOURCE — $20,000 · OtherNORTH COUNTY LGBTQ RESOURCE+3 more — $20,000 · Other+3 moreLUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION — $142,000 · HealthLUCKY DUCK FOUNDATIONPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST — $140,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE …SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $150,000 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITYMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $107,500 · EducationMassachusetts Institute o…University of the Pacific — $10,000 · EducationMainly Mozart Inc — $154,600 · Arts & CultureMainly Mozart I…+1 more — $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ARC OF SAN DIEGO — $80,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF S…DVine Path Inc — $50,210 · Human ServicesDVine Path I…NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $20,000 · Civil Rights
Other$336,500Health$282,000Education$267,500Arts & Culture$159,600Human Services$130,210Civil Rights$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMainly Mozart Inc — $154,600 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $150,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION — $142,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST — $140,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $107,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF SAN DIEGO — $80,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDVine Path Inc — $50,210 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of the Pacific — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH COAST REPERTORY THEATRE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mainly Mozart Inc
  • Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Who funds THE ARC OF SAN DIEGO
  • Who funds DVine Path Inc
  • Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC
  • Who funds University of the Pacific
  • Who funds NORTH COAST REPERTORY THEATRE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rancho Santa Fe FoundationCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The San Diego Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Heller Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph