Skip to content

· Private foundation

Heller Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$57k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$157kArts & Culture$72kHealth$63kEnvironment$46kEducation$36kPhilanthropy$1k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$245k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN$20,000
AMERICAN MEDICAL WOMENS ASSOCIATION$10,000
THE COLONIAL THEATER SCHOOL$7,500
MIANUS RIVER GORGE PRESERVE$5,000
CANTERBURY CHORAL SOCIETY$3,000
AFTER BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS$3,000
WESTERLY LAND TRUST$2,500
TEENS GROW GREENS$2,000
RIVEREDGE NATURE CENTER$2,000
DOING ART TOGETHER$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 30% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN: $30k → 9%MIANUS RIVER GORGE PRESERVE: $5k → 9%DOING ART TOGETHER: $8k → 17%RIVEREDGE NATURE CENTER: $5k → 6%AFTER BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS: $3k → 17%THE COLONIAL THEATER SCHOOL: $8k → 7%AMERICAN MEDICAL WOMENS ASSOCIATION: $10k → 14%ANNE C CARTER MEDICAL STUDENT LEADERSHIP FUND: $12k → 9%RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 9%MIANUS RIVER GORGE PRESERVE: $5k → 9%DOING ART TOGETHER: $8k → 17%RIVEREDGE NATURE CENTER: $4k → 6%TEENS GROW GREENS: $3k → 17%THE COLONIAL THEATER SCHOOL: $8k → 7%AMERICAN MEDICAL WOMENS ASSOCIATION: $10k → 14%ANNE C CARTER MEDICAL STUDENT LEADERSHIP FUND: $12k → 9%RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 9%MIANUS RIVER GORGE PRESERVE: $3k → 9%DOING ART TOGETHER: $4k → 17%RIVEREDGE NATURE CENTER: $4k → 6%TEENS GROW GREENS: $2k → 17%THE COLONIAL THEATER SCHOOL: $6k → 7%AMERICAN MEDICAL WOMENS ASSOCIATION: $10k → 14%ANNE C CARTER MEDICAL STUDENT LEADERSHIP FUND: $12k → 9%RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN: $15k → 9%MIANUS RIVER GORGE PRESERVE: $3k → 9%DOING ART TOGETHER: $2k → 17%RIVEREDGE NATURE CENTER: $3k → 6%TEENS GROW GREENS: $2k → 17%THE COLONIAL THEATER SCHOOL: $5k → 7%AMERICAN MEDICAL WOMENS ASSOCIATION: $10k → 14%RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN: $13k → 9%MIANUS RIVER GORGE PRESERVE: $3k → 9%RIVEREDGE NATURE CENTER: $2k → 6%THE COLONIAL THEATER SCHOOL: $5k → 7%AMERICAN MEDICAL WOMENS ASSOCIATION: $10k → 14%RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN: $13k → 9%WESTERLY LAND TRUST: $3k → 7%AMERICAN MEDICAL WOMENS ASSOCIATION: $10k → 14%RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN: $13k → 9%WESTERLY LAND TRUST: $3k → 7%RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN: $13k → 9%RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN: $13k → 9%CANTERBURY CHORAL SOCIETY: $3k → 17%CANTERBURY CHORAL SOCIETY: $3k → 17%CANTERBURY CHORAL SOCIETY: $3k → 17%CANTERBURY CHORAL SOCIETY: $3k → 17%CANTERBURY CHORAL SOCIETY: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$369k · 10 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$369k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+646%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsEducationAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AM
    AMERICAN MEDICAL WOMENS ASSOCIATIONINC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +144%
  • TC
    The Colonial Theatre School Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $31k · revenue +51%
  • CC
    CANTERBURY CHORAL SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $14k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • MR
    MIANUS RIVER GORGE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +646%
  • GF
    GRAYSON FAMILY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +485%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mountain Top Arboretum Inc

Conserve, enhance, and celebrate our distinctive catskill sanctuary through sustainable horticulture, responsible land stewardship, and innovative educational programming

—
2
Kestrel Land Trust

Kestrel land trust conserves and cares for forests, farms, and riverways in the connecticut river valley of western massachusetts while nurturing an enduring love of the land

Environment
3
Wildroots Collective for Learning and Stewardship

Growing resilient communities through learning & stewardship.

Environment
4
Riverside Park Conservancy Inc

The mission of the conservancy is to restore, maintain, and improve riverside park

Environment
5
Land Conservancy of Ridgefield Inc

The Land Conservancy of Ridgefield, Inc. ("the Land Conservancy"), founded in 1967, preserves and protects, for the general benefit of the public, Ridgefield, Connecticut's natural resources including land and water resources, the plant…

Environment
6
City Growers Inc

Through our original curriculum design that uses innovative growing spaces on rooftop farms, in school gardens, and public parks - city growers fosters a love of nature and encourages nyc youth to consider their place, agency, and future…

Food & Nutrition
7
Avery Coonley School

The Avery Coonley School elevates high-achieving and gifted learners through immersion in a mutually talented community where intellect, curiosity, and creativity are enhanced by optimal challenge.

—
8
Theater in the Woods Vermont Co

Theater in the woods vermont co. educates children and adults in theater skills, creative community building, and connection to the natural world through summer camps, workshops, and productions.

Arts & Culture
9
Rivers Way Outdoor Adventure
—
10
Terra Marin School

Our mission is to spark wonder and intellectual curiosity in each child. We achieve this through a purposeful blend of:Engaging academics custom-tailored to each child's abilities, strengths and interests;An unparalleled social-emotional…

Education
11
Gordonston Park Preserv Assoc Inc
—
12
Marian Friedman Greenblatt Education Fund Inc
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Riveredge Nature Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Grayson Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC: $147,700 · Recreation & SportsRAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INCANNE C CARTER MEDICAL STUDENT LEADERSHIP FUND: $36,000 · OtherANNE C CARTER MEDIC…MIANUS RIVER GORGE PRESERVE: $18,000 · OtherMIANUS RIVER GORGE …THE WESTERLY LAND TRUST: $9,000 · OtherTHE WESTERLY LAND T…+1 more: $1,000 · OtherAMERICAN MEDICAL WOMENS ASSOCIATIONINC: $60,000 · HealthAMERICAN MEDICAL WO…ABCD INC: $3,000 · HealthThe Colonial Theatre School Inc: $30,500 · Arts & CultureThe Colonial …CANTERBURY CHORAL SOCIETY INC: $14,000 · Arts & CultureCANTERBURY CH…DOING ART TOGETHER INC: $27,250 · EducationRIVEREDGE NATURE CENTER INC: $17,250 · EnvironmentTEENS GROW GREENS INC: $9,500 · Food & NutritionMIANUS RIVER GORGE INC: $1,500 · Animals
Recreation & Sports$147,700Other$64,000Health$63,000Arts & Culture$44,500Education$27,250Environment$17,250Food & Nutrition$9,500Animals$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC: $147,700 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN MEDICAL WOMENS ASSOCIATIONINC: $60,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetThe Colonial Theatre School Inc: $30,500 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetDOING ART TOGETHER INC: $27,250 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetRIVEREDGE NATURE CENTER INC: $17,250 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCANTERBURY CHORAL SOCIETY INC: $14,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetTEENS GROW GREENS INC: $9,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE WESTERLY LAND TRUST: $9,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetABCD INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMIANUS RIVER GORGE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGRAYSON FAMILY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN MEDICAL WOMENS ASSOCIATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds The Colonial Theatre School Inc ↗
  • Who funds DOING ART TOGETHER INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVEREDGE NATURE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CANTERBURY CHORAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds TEENS GROW GREENS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WESTERLY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds ABCD INC ↗
  • Who funds MIANUS RIVER GORGE INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAYSON FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Heller Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Heller Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Heller Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Heller Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Heller Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph