Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Helen R Van Rensselaer Char

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Health$65kHuman Services$37kEducation$32kRecreation & Sports$18kAnimals$13kPublic Benefit$5kReligion$5kPhilanthropy$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$6,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$457k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY$10,000
CAMP HOLIDAY TRAILS$6,000
SECOND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $5k → 20%RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $10k → 20%RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES: $7k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$144k · 9 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$144k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+33%

Still filing today

89%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BF
    BRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $38k · revenue +63%
  • TR
    THE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC
    3× · 2018–2024 · $22k · revenue +31%
  • BH
    BOYS HOME INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $20k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • ES
    EASTER SEALS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $9k · revenue 0%
  • EU
    EASTERSEALS UCP NC VA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
  • RV
    ROANOKE VALLEY SPEECH AND
    one grant, 2018 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sentara Rmh Medical Center

As part of sentara health's integrated health care system, we improve health every day.

Health
2
Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine

The mission of the edward via college of osteopathic medicine (vcom) is to prepare globally-minded, community-focused physicians to meet the needs of rural and medically underserved populations and promote research to improve human health.

Education
3
Sentara Enterprises

As part of sentara health's integrated health care organization, we improve health everyday through the provision of health care facilities and services for sick, injured, disabled, indigent, and aged persons.

Health
4
Sentara Health

We improve health every day through coordinating, promoting and planning for the provision of health services and the promotion of health, medical education, and the social, cultural, educational, and economic development of the community.

Health
5
East Carolina Health

To improve the health and well-being of eastern north carolina.

Health
6
Sentara Hospitals

As part of sentara health's integrated health care system, we improve health every day.

Health
7
University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Inc

To improve the health and well-being of eastern north carolina.

Health
8
Sentara Medical Group

See schedule o.as part of sentara health's integrated health care system, we improve health every day through the establishment and operation of programs and services for the provision of health care and for health related purposes; the…

Health
9
Sentara Princess Anne Hospital

As part of sentara health's integrated health care system, we improve health every day.

Health
10
Carolina Medicorp Enterprises Inc

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

11
Martha Jefferson Hospital

As part of sentara health's integrated delivery system, we improve health every day.

Health
12
The Outer Banks Hospital Inc

To enhance the quality of life for the residents and visitors of dare county and the surrounding region by promoting wellness and providing the highest quality healthcare services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals Ucp North Carolina & Virginia Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC — $38,000 · OtherBRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INCEASTER SEALS UCP NORTH CAROLINA — $12,500 · OtherEASTER SEALS UCP NORTH CAROLINAST VINCENT'S HOME — $12,000 · OtherST VINCENT'S HOMEEASTER SEALS INC — $9,000 · OtherEASTER SEALS INCEASTERSEALS UCP NC VA INC — $6,000 · OtherEASTERSEALS UCP NC VA INCROANOKE VALLEY SPEECH AND — $5,000 · OtherROANOKE VALLEY SPEECH ANDSECOND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $5,000 · OtherSECOND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH+1 more — $2,500 · OtherBOYS HOME INC — $20,000 · EducationBOYS HOME INCELMIRA COLLEGE — $12,375 · EducationELMIRA COLLEGETHE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC — $22,375 · Human ServicesTHE RESCUE MI…CAMP HOLIDAY TRAILS — $18,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP HOLIDA…EASTER SEALS UCP NORTH CAROLINA & VIRGINIA INC — $5,000 · HealthEASTER SE…ROANOKE VALLEY SPEECH & HEARING CENTER INC — $5,000 · HealthROANOKE V…American Heart Association Inc — $5,000 · HealthAmerican …UNITED WAY OF VIRGINIA'S BLUE RIDGE INC — $3,750 · Philanthropy
Other$90,000Education$32,375Human Services$22,375Recreation & Sports$18,000Health$15,000Philanthropy$3,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC — $38,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC — $22,375 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS HOME INC — $20,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP HOLIDAY TRAILS — $18,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetELMIRA COLLEGE — $12,375 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST VINCENT'S HOME — $12,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC — $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS UCP NORTH CAROLINA & VIRGINIA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROANOKE VALLEY SPEECH & HEARING CENTER INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF VIRGINIA'S BLUE RIDGE INC — $3,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation Serving Western VirginiaVA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation Serving Western Virginia · Edgar a Thurman Fdn Children Nect · Robertson Family Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Helen R Van Rensselaer Char funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph