Skip to content

· Private foundation

Helen J Prince Foundation Security National Trust Co Trustee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$471k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$175k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$1.1MArts & Culture$400kYouth Development$390kHealth$307kHuman Services$68kPhilanthropy$65kEducation$35kCommunity Improvement$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $173k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $293k
$22,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE OGLEBAY FOUNDATION$175,000
YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC$62,500
WHEELING HEALTH RIGHT$55,520
WHEELING SYMPHONY SOCIETY$35,000
ORCHARD PARK HOSPITAL$25,000
WHEELING PARK HIGH SCHOOL BAND$24,210
HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER$22,500
NORTHERN PANHANDLE CONSERVATION DISTRICT$20,000
EASTER SEAL REHABILITATION CENTER$14,800
MIDDLE CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$11,234
UNITED WAY OF THE UPPER OHIO VALLEY$10,000
OGLEBAY INSTITUTE$10,000
WOODSDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$4,924
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $483k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM: $100k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM: $100k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $63k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM: $50k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM: $50k → 15%COMMUNITY IMPACT NETWORK: $25k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $23k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM: $20k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $15k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $15k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $15k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 9 repeat orgs$129k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$2.3M
$68k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
0%

Still filing today

67%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsArts & CultureEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OF
    OGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +118%
  • YS
    YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $390k · revenue +28%
  • WH
    WHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $232k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • CI
    COMMUNITY IMPACT NETWORK INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -42%
  • WP
    WHEELING PARK HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
2
Southeastern Ohio Center for Independent Living

Provide services to people with disabilities. such services include assistance with housing, employment, transportation and recreational issues.

Human Services
3
Community Social Services of Wayne County

To improve the quality of life throughout the life cycle by strengthening individuals, families, communities, alleviating human suffering and advocating policies & services which promote human dignity and self-sufficiency.

—
4
United Way of North Central Ohio Inc

At united way of north central ohio, we bring people, organizations, and resources together to create solutions that improve the lives of every person in every community in our region.

—
5
Valley Health Systems Inc

To provide quality healthcare to all individuals, emphasizing outreach to those who are underserved. valley health strives to ensure that quality healthcare is readily accessible to everyone and serves patients regardless of their ability…

Health
6
Oberlin Early Childhood Center

The organization operates a childhood center in oberlin, ohio for up tp 100 children ages six weeks to five years old. the center provides a unique, child centered campus for anyone in need regardless of financial ability.

Human Services
7
Ohio Valley Goodwill Industries

The mission of ohio valley goodwill industries rehabilitation center, inc. is to provide vocational rehabilitation, training, and employment services to individuals with either disabilities or social and economic barriers to full employment

—
8
Life Hub Inc

To facilitate coordinated wrap-around service to benefit homeless individuals in the city of wheeling and ohio county.

Human Services
9
The Childrens Home of Wheeling Inc

To provide care to childen and their families through a range of services that promote healthy growth and improve the quality of family life

Human Services
10
Oberlin Community Services Council

Oberlin community services council is a responsive community organization that provides direct assistance, referrals, outreach and educational support to lorain county residents who struggle to meet basic needs.

Human Services
11
Human Resources Center Inc

Services to challenged individuals in Vocational,Residential, Home Based, and Community settings.

Human Services
12
Ohio Hills Health Services

Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. the primary…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of the Upper Ohio Valley Inc; the most unlike its peers is Easter Seal Rehabilitation Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC: $1,114,050 · Recreation & SportsOGLEBAY FOUNDATION INCYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $390,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM …THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $67,500 · Human ServicesTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPE…COMMUNITY IMPACT NETWORK INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesWHEELING PARK HIGH SCHOOL BAND AND CHORAL BOOSTERS: $80,435 · OtherWHEELING PARK…WHEELING PARK HIGH SCHOOL BAND: $75,509 · OtherWHEELING PARK…ORCHARD PARK HOSPITAL: $60,486 · OtherORCHARD PARK …NORTHERN PANHANDLE CONSERVATION DISTRICT: $20,000 · OtherNORTHERN PANH…WHEELING PARK HIGH SCHOOL: $15,000 · OtherMIDDLE CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $11,234 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · Other+4 more: $22,775 · Other+4 moreWHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC: $231,676 · HealthWHEELING HE…EASTER SEAL REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $14,800 · HealthEASTER SEAL…WHEELING SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC: $189,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC: $55,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyOGLEBAY INSTITUTE: $55,000 · Environment
Recreation & Sports$1,114,050Human Services$482,500Other$295,439Health$246,476Arts & Culture$189,000Philanthropy$65,000Environment$55,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC: $1,114,050 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $390,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetWHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC: $231,676 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetWHEELING SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC: $189,000 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $67,500 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetOGLEBAY INSTITUTE: $55,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC: $55,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY IMPACT NETWORK INC: $25,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetEASTER SEAL REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $14,800 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEELING SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OGLEBAY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY IMPACT NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEAL REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds LAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albert Schenk III & Kathleen H Schenk Charitable TrustWV24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albert Schenk III & Kathleen H Schenk Charitable Trust · James B Chambers Memorial · Elizabeth Stifel Kline Foundation · Stamp 2001 Charitable Fund · August J & Thelma S Hoffmann Foundation · The Banford & Terri Exley Family Foundation Inc · Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundation · Hess Family Foundation · Harry and Helen Sands Charitable Trust · Stamp Charitable Fund · Robinson S Parlin Trust · W E Stone Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Helen J Prince Foundation Security National Trust Co Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Helen J Prince Foundation Security National Trust Co Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Helen J Prince Foundation Security National Trust Co Trustee?

    Find your warmest path to Helen J Prince Foundation Security National Trust Co Trustee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Helen J Prince Foundation Security National Trust Co Trustee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph