Skip to content

· Private foundation

Helen Forde Gander and Mary a Baldwin Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$55kArts & Culture$53kHealth$50kRecreation & Sports$33kYouth Development$32kScience & Tech$21kInternational$15kHousing & Shelter$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$943k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOODLANDS FOUNDATION$10,000
SEWICKLEY ACADEMY$10,000
CS KIM KARATE CHILD SAFETY PROGRAM$10,000
CENTER FOR THEATER ARTS$10,000
THE FIRST TEE OF PITTSBURGH$8,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$4,800
AMERICAN HEROES FLAGPOLES FOUNDATIO$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LIGONIER VALLEY YMCA: $1k → 10%LIGONIER VALLEY YMCA: $1k → 10%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $6k → 11%WOODLANDS FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%WOODLANDS FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%WOODLANDS FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%WOODLANDS FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%WOODLANDS FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$255k · 9 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against -16% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

$255k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
-16%

Still filing today

78%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR THEATER ARTS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $53k · revenue +21%
  • SA
    SEWICKLEY ACADEMY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +22%
  • CJ
    CR JRS CHIP
    4× · 2022–2025 · $32k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • LO
    LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue -16%
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Channel Islands Young Men's Christian Association

The channel islands ymca is a charitable organization providing programs based upon christian principles to people of all ages, races, religious beliefs and economic status, to promote youth development, healthy living and social…

Human Services
2
Veritas Academy

God's word is the foundation for all learning. our curriculum and teaching method provides students a comprhensive application of scripture in all disciplines. our goal is to assist each student in developing a biblical world view by…

Education
3
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Oklahoma City

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
4
Woodinville Montessori School

Woodinville montessori school is dedicated to the optimal intellectual, emotional, social, physical, ethical & spiritual development of each child using montessori methods.

Education
5
Our Lady of the Woods Corporation

To operate a private school for age 3 through eighth grade students.

—
6
Young Mens Christian Association of Cortland

The mission and purpose of the ymca is to serve the community by reaching out to everyone in the community in a spirit of inclusion and fellowship. ymcas put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit,…

Human Services
7
Luria Academy of Brooklyn

Luria academy is a child-centered environment dedicated to academic excellence and a sophisticated knowledge of jewish text and jewish heritage. located in the prospect heights neighborhood of brookly, luria academy is a jewish…

Education
8
Woodfield Academy Inc

Woodfield academy empowers students with diagnosed learning differences or developmental disorders to reach their maximum potential through an individualized education approach.

Education
9
Christian Montessori School of Lake Norman

It is our mission to provide a montessori education that celebrates the individual gifts of the child, nurtures a passion for learning biblical principles and equips children for academic excellence and discipleship.

Education
10
Churchill School and Center

To provide an innovative and transformational k-12 learning community that empowers students with language-based learning disabilities.

Education
11
Woodland Hill Montessori School

Woodland hill montessori school - a diverse and engaging educational partnership of parents, teachers, children, and community - nurtures a child's love of learning and sense of social and personal responsibility using the child-centered…

Education
12
The Woodlands Christian Academy

TWCA is an independent, Christ-centered college preparatory school that integrates learning with biblical faith and challenges our students to reach their highest potential - intellectually, creatively, physically, and socially - for the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Woodlands Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mote Marine Laboratory Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SEWICKLEY ACADEMY: $50,000 · EducationSEWICKLEY ACADEMYCR JRS CHIP: $32,000 · EducationCR JRS CHIPC S KIM KARATE CHILD SAFETY PROGRAM INC: $30,000 · OtherC S KIM KARATE CHILD SAFETY PRO…MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC: $20,700 · OtherMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INCFOUNDATION PIERRE SMITH MODELUS INC: $15,000 · OtherFOUNDATION PIERRE SMITH MODELUS…FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $4,800 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN UNIVERS…AMERICAN HEROES FLAGPOLES FOUNDATIO: $2,700 · Other+1 more: $2,400 · OtherWOODLANDS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesWOODLANDS FOUNDATION INCLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES…LIGONIER VALLEY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIA ASSOCIATION: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR THEATER ARTS: $52,850 · Arts & CultureTHE CENTER FOR THEATER…
Education$82,000Other$75,600Human Services$58,000Arts & Culture$52,850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CENTER FOR THEATER ARTS: $52,850 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetWOODLANDS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSEWICKLEY ACADEMY: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCR JRS CHIP: $32,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC: $20,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION PIERRE SMITH MODELUS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIGONIER VALLEY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIA ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR THEATER ARTS ↗
  • Who funds WOODLANDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SEWICKLEY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds CR JRS CHIP ↗
  • Who funds MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION PIERRE SMITH MODELUS INC ↗
  • Who funds LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LIGONIER VALLEY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIA ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Helen Forde Gander and Mary a Baldwin Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Helen Forde Gander and Mary a Baldwin Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Mote Marine Laboratory Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Helen Forde Gander and Mary a Baldwin Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Helen Forde Gander and Mary a Baldwin Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Helen Forde Gander and Mary a Baldwin’s filings →

More from the funding graph