Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Helen Forde Gander and Mary a Baldwin Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0172% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20212025.

Education$82kHuman Services$58kArts & Culture$53kOther$76k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$943k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOODLANDS FOUNDATION$10,000
CENTER FOR THEATER ARTS$10,000
SEWICKLEY ACADEMY$10,000
CS KIM KARATE CHILD SAFETY PROGRAM$10,000
THE FIRST TEE OF PITTSBURGH$8,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$4,800
AMERICAN HEROES FLAGPOLES FOUNDATIO$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LIGONIER VALLEY YMCA: $1k → 10%LIGONIER VALLEY YMCA: $1k → 10%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $6k → 11%WOODLANDS FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%WOODLANDS FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%WOODLANDS FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%WOODLANDS FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%WOODLANDS FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$255k · 9 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against -16% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

$255k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
-16%

Still filing today

78%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR THEATER ARTS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $53k · revenue +21%
  • SA
    SEWICKLEY ACADEMY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +22%
  • CJ
    CR JRS CHIP
    4× · 2022–2025 · $32k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • LO
    LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue -16%
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
    one grant, 2024 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Channel Islands Young Men's Christian Association

The channel islands ymca is a charitable organization providing programs based upon christian principles to people of all ages, races, religious beliefs and economic status, to promote youth development, healthy living and social…

Human Services
2
Veritas Academy

God's word is the foundation for all learning. our curriculum and teaching method provides students a comprhensive application of scripture in all disciplines. our goal is to assist each student in developing a biblical world view by…

Education
3
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Oklahoma City

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
4
Woodinville Montessori School

Woodinville montessori school is dedicated to the optimal intellectual, emotional, social, physical, ethical & spiritual development of each child using montessori methods.

Education
5
Our Lady of the Woods Corporation

To operate a private school for age 3 through eighth grade students.

6
Young Mens Christian Association of Cortland

The mission and purpose of the ymca is to serve the community by reaching out to everyone in the community in a spirit of inclusion and fellowship. ymcas put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit,…

Human Services
7
Luria Academy of Brooklyn

Luria academy is a child-centered environment dedicated to academic excellence and a sophisticated knowledge of jewish text and jewish heritage. located in the prospect heights neighborhood of brookly, luria academy is a jewish…

Education
8
Woodfield Academy Inc

Woodfield academy empowers students with diagnosed learning differences or developmental disorders to reach their maximum potential through an individualized education approach.

Education
9
Christian Montessori School of Lake Norman

It is our mission to provide a montessori education that celebrates the individual gifts of the child, nurtures a passion for learning biblical principles and equips children for academic excellence and discipleship.

Education
10
Churchill School and Center

To provide an innovative and transformational k-12 learning community that empowers students with language-based learning disabilities.

Education
11
Woodland Hill Montessori School

Woodland hill montessori school - a diverse and engaging educational partnership of parents, teachers, children, and community - nurtures a child's love of learning and sense of social and personal responsibility using the child-centered…

Education
12
The Woodlands Christian Academy

TWCA is an independent, Christ-centered college preparatory school that integrates learning with biblical faith and challenges our students to reach their highest potential - intellectually, creatively, physically, and socially - for the…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Woodlands Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mote Marine Laboratory Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SEWICKLEY ACADEMY — $50,000 · EducationSEWICKLEY ACADEMYCR JRS CHIP — $32,000 · EducationCR JRS CHIPC S KIM KARATE CHILD SAFETY PROGRAM INC — $30,000 · OtherC S KIM KARATE CHILD SAFETY PRO…MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC — $20,700 · OtherMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INCFOUNDATION PIERRE SMITH MODELUS INC — $15,000 · OtherFOUNDATION PIERRE SMITH MODELUS…FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $4,800 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN UNIVERS…AMERICAN HEROES FLAGPOLES FOUNDATIO — $2,700 · Other+1 more — $2,400 · OtherWOODLANDS FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesWOODLANDS FOUNDATION INCLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES…LIGONIER VALLEY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIA ASSOCIATION — $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR THEATER ARTS — $52,850 · Arts & CultureTHE CENTER FOR THEATER…
Education$82,000Other$75,600Human Services$58,000Arts & Culture$52,850

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CENTER FOR THEATER ARTS — $52,850 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetWOODLANDS FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSEWICKLEY ACADEMY — $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCR JRS CHIP — $32,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC — $20,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION PIERRE SMITH MODELUS INC — $15,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIGONIER VALLEY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIA ASSOCIATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR THEATER ARTS
  • Who funds WOODLANDS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SEWICKLEY ACADEMY
  • Who funds CR JRS CHIP
  • Who funds MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC
  • Who funds FOUNDATION PIERRE SMITH MODELUS INC
  • Who funds LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds LIGONIER VALLEY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIA ASSOCIATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Helen Forde Gander and Mary a Baldwin Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Mote Marine Laboratory Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Helen Forde Gander and Mary a Baldwin Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Helen Forde Gander and Mary a Baldwin Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph