Loading…
· Private foundation
HEARTH & HOME MINISTRIES INC
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$36k
Granted FY2025
9
Grants
8
Communities
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 78% of HEARTH & HOME MINISTRIES INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
missionarynorth
2021
north
2022
church
2023
church
2024
educational
2025
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2025 · 9 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$160k
Total assets
Largest grants
- International Students Inc - ISI$7,000
- Mission to the World - MTW$5,475
- Frontiers USA$5,000
- Mission to North America - MNA$5,000
- Equipping Leaders Intl - ELI$5,000
- International Church Missions$4,000
- People in Mission International$3,000
- HEART of Texas$1,000
- Oasis Focus Inc$1,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$148k · 17 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else
17 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
17
15
Total granted
$148k
$56k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+42%
+45%
Still filing today
29%
27%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
ReligionInternationalEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- THTexas Home School Coalition2× · 2020–2021 · $6k · revenue +219%
- CGCaleb Global2× · 2021–2024 · $6k · revenue +42%
- FTFor the Nations Refugee Outreach -2× · 2022–2024 · $4k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- AVArab Vision Incone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +7%
- CDCasa del Lagoone grant, 2024 · $10k
- ICIntervarsity Christian Fellowshipone grant, 2023 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Equipping Network
Equipping Network will join the teaching team of T-Net Internationaltraining pastors from five African countries.Equipping Network wil teach weeklong marriage and parenting courses to Pastors in other countries.
Human Services
2
Timothy Two Project International
Reaching and teaching Pastors in the majority world
Religion
3
Network Beyond
A Christian organization transforming people and communities through Christian leadership training, justice and compassion, and expanding networks.
Crime & Legal
4
Malachi Network Inc
Training mobilizing and encouraging missionaries and church planters around the world
Religion
5
Horizon Education Network
We partner with theological schools around the world to equip ministry leaders through online learning and digital resource development in their own language and culture for global service.
Human Services
6
Explore God Network
—
7
Tim Robnett Ministries
ETeamGlobal trains evangelists globally in partnership with local churches and communicates the gospel of Jesus Christ in as many places and ways, that the Lord allows.
Religion
8
T-Net International
TNET is an international Christian training organization Its mission is To return the church to its disciplemaking roots worldwide
Philanthropy
9
Redeeming the Nations Ministries Inc
To propagate the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ by all means and avenues, Including TV Broadcasting and other Media, throughout the world
Religion
10
Christianity Today International
Equipping Christians to renew their minds, serve the church, and create culture to the glory of God
Religion
11
International Biblical Training Inc
International Biblical Training is a teaching, training and equipping religious ministry. IBT staff provide theological teaching and training for the purpose of making Christian disciples who in turn train and disciple others in…
Religion
12
Tranformation of the Nations
Transformation of the Nations seeks to connect people with the needs and suffering of people in our own country and around the world. We connect them through short term mission trips, seminars,and training events. These seminars with…
Religion
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Equipping Leaders International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Arab Vision Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$168,675Religion$30,000International$8,000Education$6,000Arts & Culture$2,000Human Services$1,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Arab Vision Inc ↗
- Who funds Texas Home School Coalition ↗
- Who funds Caleb Global ↗
- Who funds Frontiers USA ↗
- Who funds International Church Missions ↗
- Who funds For the Nations Refugee Outreach - ↗
- Who funds People in Mission International ↗
- Who funds HEART of Texas ↗
- Who funds Behind the Scene International ↗
- Who funds Equipping Leaders International ↗
- Who funds Network of Community Ministries ↗
- Who funds North Texas Food Bank ↗
- Who funds Ligonier Ministries ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Pinetops FoundationOR16× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Pinetops Foundation · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation HEARTH & HOME MINISTRIES INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Arab Vision Inc.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 481270313 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Arab Vision Inc, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 11% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Hearth & Home Ministries Inc?
Find your warmest path to Hearth & Home Ministries Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines