Skip to content

· Public charity

Heart of Alabama Food Bank Inc

The food bank operates as a clearing house for the collecting, sorting, storing and distribution of edible food to qualified agencies; who in turn pass the food along to alabama's "food insecure" citizens.

$43M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$1.2M
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $289,095, the rows itemized in this filing. The $42,709,255 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $42,420,160 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $131k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALABAMA STATE ASSOCIATION OF COOPERATIVES$80,000
ELMORE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY$50,955
ROCKFORD BAPTIST CHURCH$39,636
FOOD BANK OF EAST ALABAMA$33,710
FEEDING THE GULF COAST$20,000
CHRISTIAN LOVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC$11,982
AL HOOKS PRODUCE$10,000
CLEVELAND FLOORING AND CONSTRUCTION LLC$8,500
ALL SAINTS KINGDOM CHURCH$7,700
LONG CREEK MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH$7,500
CHILTON COUNTY EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE CENTER INC$6,655
MBA COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC$6,246
ULINE$6,211
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%CHRISTIAN LOVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $12k → 27%CHILTON COUNTY EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE CENTER INC: $7k → 16%A NEW BEGINNING FOR YOU: $10k → 27%CARING FOR CITIZENS OF ALABAMA: $36k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

24%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$274k · 5 repeat orgs$882k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
19

Total granted

$274k
$690k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+10%

Still filing today

20%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $192k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF EAST ALABAMA INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $99k · revenue 0%
  • RB
    ROCKFORD BAPTIST CHURCH
    2× · 2024–2025 · $55k
  • AH
    AL HOOKS PRODUCE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $50k

Funded once

  • WI
    WELCOME INC
    one grant, 2024 · $167k
  • SB
    SOUTHSIDE BAPT CH - GREENVILLE - SHEPHERD'S TABLE
    one grant, 2024 · $92k
  • MU
    METROPOLITAN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $67k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Food Bank of Central Alabama

To feed people in need today and foster collaborative solutions to end hunger tomorrow.

Food & Nutrition
2
Food Bank of North Alabama Inc

collect warehouse & distribute food to needy organizations

Food & Nutrition
3
Feeding Alabama

To end hunger by assisting food bank networks in obtaining more food and funds, fostering public awareness of the food banks' mission, and creating partnerships to alleviate hunger in alabama.

Food & Nutrition
4
Appling County Food Bank Inc

Our mission is to provide free food to needy families in appling county.

Food & Nutrition
5
Tillman County Food Bank Foundation
—
6
Dale County Rescue Mission

The rescue missions purpose is to provide food, housing , and transportation in emergency situations to local residents and transients, Those served are spiritually ministered.

Human Services
7
Alabama Restaurant & Hospitality Association Foundation
—
8
Limestone County Churches Involved

To provide food and general assistance to individuals of Limestone County Alabama who are facing short term financial crisesTo mobilize churches of Limestone County to provide a prayerful way to meet the physical and spiritual needs of…

Religion
9
Anniston Soup Bowl Inc

To provide lunches to the poor people of anniston and calhoun county, alabama

Food & Nutrition
10
Reclaimed for Good Inc
Human Services
11
Augusta Food Bank

The augusta food bank provides a supplemental source of food to individuals and families in need.

Food & Nutrition
12
Colquitt Food and Clothing Bank Inc

The purpose of this organization is to provide food to low income and needy families/individuals of Colquitt County, Georgia. Counseling in health and nutrition to these families/individual residents of Colquitt County is also provided.…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding the Gulf Coast; the most unlike its peers is Caring for Citizens of Alabama. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WELCOME INC: $167,000 · OtherWELCOME INCFOOD BANK OF EAST ALABAMA INC: $99,119 · OtherFOOD BANK OF EAST ALABAMA INCSOUTHSIDE BAPT CH - GREENVILLE - SHEPHERD'S TABLE: $91,782 · OtherSOUTHSIDE BAPT CH - GREENVILLE - SHEPHERD'S TABLEALABAMA STATE ASSOCIATION OF COOPERATIVES: $80,000 · OtherALABAMA STATE ASSOCIATION OF COOPERATIVESMETROPOLITAN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $66,980 · OtherMETROPOLITAN UNITED METHODIST CHURCHWEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC: $60,000 · OtherWEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK INCROCKFORD BAPTIST CHURCH: $55,294 · OtherROCKFORD BAPTIST CHURCHTRUE DIVINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $52,598 · OtherCAPITAL TRACTOR: $51,500 · OtherAL HOOKS PRODUCE: $49,755 · OtherALL SAINTS KINGDOM CHURCH: $40,350 · OtherKATOM RESTAURANT SUPPLY: $36,819 · Other+13 more: $156,545 · Other+13 moreCARING FOR CITIZENS OF ALABAMA: $36,000 · Human ServicesAutauga Interfaith Care Center Inc: $13,053 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN LOVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP INC: $11,982 · Human ServicesA NEW BEGINNING FOR YOU INC: $9,955 · Human ServicesCHILTON COUNTY EMERGENCY CENTER INC: $6,655 · Human ServicesELMORE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC: $50,955 · Food & NutritionFeeding the Gulf Coast: $20,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,007,742Human Services$77,645Food & Nutrition$70,955

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD BANK OF EAST ALABAMA INC: $99,119 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC: $60,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetELMORE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC: $50,955 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetFeeding the Gulf Coast: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAutauga Interfaith Care Center Inc: $13,053 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetA NEW BEGINNING FOR YOU INC: $9,955 over 1y, 3.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF EAST ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds ELMORE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding the Gulf Coast ↗
  • Who funds Autauga Interfaith Care Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN LOVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP INC ↗
  • Who funds A NEW BEGINNING FOR YOU INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILTON COUNTY EMERGENCY CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alabama Power Foundation IncAL16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Heart of Alabama Food Bank Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Heart of Alabama Food Bank Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Heart of Alabama Food Bank’s filings →

    More from the funding graph