Skip to content
Healthierhere at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Healthierhere

HEALTHIERHERE is dedicated to reducing health disparities and improving the health and wellbeing of all people in king county through innovative, cross-sector collaborations.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$688k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Human Services$1.7MHealth$1.6MCivil Rights$165kInternational$141kCommunity Improvement$119kArts & Culture$50kReligion$42kEducation$19kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $180k
  • $250k+2 grants · $966k
$277,188
Median grant
1
States reached
$60M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WITHIN REACH$688,333
LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES NORTHWEST$277,188
YMCA$98,043
EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA$81,615
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $947k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SOMALI BRIDGE: $23k → 9%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $82k → 9%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $40k → 9%ERITREAN ASSOCIATION IN GREATER SEATTLE: $30k → 9%KHMER COMMUNITY OF SEATTLE KING COUNTY: $46k → 9%UTOPIA WASHINGTON: $18k → 9%LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES NORTHWEST: $277k → 9%LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES NORTHWEST: $229k → 9%HORN OF AFRICA SERVICES: $22k → 9%YMCA: $98k → 9%SERVE ETHIOPIANS WASHINGTON: $16k → 9%CONGOLESE INTEGRATION NETWORK: $46k → 9%EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 3 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
29

Total granted

$1.6M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
-2%

Still filing today

100%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $98k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementEducationArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • W
    WITHINREACH
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +21%
  • LC
    Lutheran Community Services Northwest
    2× · 2023–2024 · $506k · revenue +32%
  • EC
    EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA
    2× · 2023–2024 · $122k · revenue -18%

Funded once

  • SM
    SEA MAR SKILLED NURSING FACILITY
    one grant, 2023 · $494k · revenue -95%
  • NH
    NEIGHBORCARE HEALTH
    one grant, 2023 · $437k · revenue -6%
  • SI
    SEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD
    one grant, 2023 · $371k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seattle Indian Center
Human Services
2
Wakulima Usa

Our Food Production Center will serve as our primary storage production and distribution facility. The coop will aggregate purchase store and distribute farm inputs for members and will act as an integrator collecting the output from…

Food & Nutrition
3
Lao Community Service Center

Lao Community Service center's mission is to united the Lao Community in the Pacific Northwest. We assist the Lao Community with social, cultural, and educational services.

Human Services
4
Emergency Medical Services at the University of Washington
Health
5
Comunidades Sin Fronteras Washington

To provide services needed in the community

Community Improvement
6
Somali Cultural Center

Amplifying Somali Voices & Building Communities

Arts & Culture
7
Washington Ethnic Studies Now

Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…

Education
8
Pacific Islander Health Board of Washington

The Pacific Islander Health Board (PIHB) seeks to cultivate resilience within our communities to achieve health equity through culturally safe and community-driven solutions, traditions, advocacy, and policy.

Human Services
9
East African Healing Services
—
10
Sea Mar Community Health Centers

Sea mar community health centers is a community-based organization committed to providing quality, comprehensive health, human, housing, educational, and cultural services to diverse communities, specializing in service to latinos.

Health
11
Nashi Immigrants Health Board

We partner with Ukrainians and advocate through community engagement, empowerment, and connection to resources. We seek to understand, support, and empower our community and provide for a healthy future for "Nashi" (our community) through…

Health
12
Integration Family Services

To enhance the capabilities and self-sufficiency of marginalized immigrant and refugee communities in king county to achieve improved quality of life and reach their full potential through access to, and advocacy for, services and…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is East African Community Services; the most unlike its peers is Sea Mar Skilled Nursing Facility. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
13/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WITHINREACH: $1,013,969 · OtherWITHINREACHSEA MAR SKILLED NURSING FACILITY: $493,956 · OtherSEA MAR SKILLED NURSING FACILITYASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $67,318 · OtherCENTER FOR MULTICUTURAL HEALTH: $61,421 · Other+5 more: $124,358 · Other+5 moreNEIGHBORCARE HEALTH: $436,529 · HealthNEIGHBORCARE HEALTHSEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD: $371,012 · HealthSEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARDINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES: $71,952 · HealthINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HEA…KIN ON HEALTH CARE CENTER: $49,640 · HealthLIFELONG HEALTH FOR ALL: $43,456 · HealthLutheran Community Services Northwest: $506,318 · Human ServicesLutheran Community Services…EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $121,580 · Human ServicesEL CENTRO DE LA RAZATHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871): $98,043 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN A…CONGOLESE INTEGRATION NETWORK: $46,189 · Human ServicesKHMER COMMUNITY OF SEATTLE KING COUNTY: $45,949 · Human Services+6 more: $129,353 · Human Services+6 moreWHITE CENTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $47,464 · Community ImprovementINTERIM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $41,549 · Community ImprovementMetropolitan Seattle Sickle Cell Task Force: $41,738 · EducationPara Los Ninos de Highline: $19,255 · EducationEthiopian Community in Seattle: $31,357 · Arts & CultureASSOCIATION OF ZAMBIANS IN SEATTLE: $19,029 · Arts & CultureKHALSA GURMAT CENTER: $42,288 · ReligionFANIKIA FOUNDATION: $14,381 · International
Other$1,761,022Health$972,589Human Services$947,432Community Improvement$89,013Education$60,993Arts & Culture$50,386Religion$42,288International$14,381

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWITHINREACH: $1,013,969 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetLutheran Community Services Northwest: $506,318 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNEIGHBORCARE HEALTH: $436,529 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD: $371,012 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $121,580 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871): $98,043 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES: $71,952 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR MULTICUTURAL HEALTH: $61,421 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetKIN ON HEALTH CARE CENTER: $49,640 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWHITE CENTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $47,464 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCONGOLESE INTEGRATION NETWORK: $46,189 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetKHMER COMMUNITY OF SEATTLE KING COUNTY: $45,949 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetLIFELONG HEALTH FOR ALL: $43,456 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKHALSA GURMAT CENTER: $42,288 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetMetropolitan Seattle Sickle Cell Task Force: $41,738 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetINTERIM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $41,549 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEthiopian Community in Seattle: $31,357 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetVILLA COMUNITARIA: $30,148 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetERITREAN ASSOCIATION IN GREATER SEATTLE: $29,832 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetHMONG ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON: $26,138 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetSomali Bridge: $23,400 over 1y, 30% of budgetHORN OF AFRICA SERVICES: $22,237 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEast African Community Services: $19,993 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPara Los Ninos de Highline: $19,255 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetASSOCIATION OF ZAMBIANS IN SEATTLE: $19,029 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetUNITED TERRITORIES OF PACIFIC ISLANDERS WASHINGTON-UTOPIA WA: $17,727 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSERVE ETHIOPIANS WASHINGTON: $16,164 over 1y, 11% of budgetFANIKIA FOUNDATION: $14,381 over 1y, 20% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationUnited Way of King Co…Inatai FoundationPhilanthropy NorthwestSheng-Yen Lu Foundati…The Norcliffe Foundat…Gates FoundationSchool's Out Washingt…Building ChangesNorthwest Harvest EmmPuget Sound Energy Fo…Colectiva Legal del P…
Seattle FoundationWA46.6× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · United Way of King County · Inatai Foundation · Philanthropy Northwest · Sheng-Yen Lu Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Gates Foundation · School's Out Washington · Building Changes · Northwest Harvest Emm · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Colectiva Legal del Pueblo

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Healthierhere funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Healthierhere. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Healthierhere’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home