· Public charity
Healthierhere
HEALTHIERHERE is dedicated to reducing health disparities and improving the health and wellbeing of all people in king county through innovative, cross-sector collaborations.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $50k–250k2 grants · $180k
- $250k+2 grants · $966k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WITHIN REACH | $688,333 |
| LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES NORTHWEST | $277,188 |
| YMCA | $98,043 |
| EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA | $81,615 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $947k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $98k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WWITHINREACH2× · 2023–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +21%
- LCLutheran Community Services Northwest2× · 2023–2024 · $506k · revenue +32%
- ECEL CENTRO DE LA RAZA2× · 2023–2024 · $122k · revenue -18%
Funded once
- SMSEA MAR SKILLED NURSING FACILITYone grant, 2023 · $494k · revenue -95%
- NHNEIGHBORCARE HEALTHone grant, 2023 · $437k · revenue -6%
- SISEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARDone grant, 2023 · $371k · revenue -6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our Food Production Center will serve as our primary storage production and distribution facility. The coop will aggregate purchase store and distribute farm inputs for members and will act as an integrator collecting the output from…
Lao Community Service center's mission is to united the Lao Community in the Pacific Northwest. We assist the Lao Community with social, cultural, and educational services.
To provide services needed in the community
Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…
We partner with Ukrainians and advocate through community engagement, empowerment, and connection to resources. We seek to understand, support, and empower our community and provide for a healthy future for "Nashi" (our community) through…
Amplifying Somali Voices & Building Communities
The Pacific Islander Health Board (PIHB) seeks to cultivate resilience within our communities to achieve health equity through culturally safe and community-driven solutions, traditions, advocacy, and policy.
Sec provides culturally sensitive mental health resources, connects clients to professionals, offers education, emotional support, promotes maternal health, early childhold outcomes, and advocates for housing security for somali…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighborcare Health and the most unlike its peers is Sea Mar Skilled Nursing Facility. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WITHINREACH ↗
- Who funds Lutheran Community Services Northwest ↗
- Who funds SEA MAR SKILLED NURSING FACILITY ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORCARE HEALTH ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD ↗
- Who funds EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR MULTICUTURAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds KIN ON HEALTH CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds WHITE CENTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CONGOLESE INTEGRATION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds KHMER COMMUNITY OF SEATTLE KING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds LIFELONG HEALTH FOR ALL ↗
- Who funds KHALSA GURMAT CENTER ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Seattle Sickle Cell Task Force ↗
- Who funds INTERIM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Ethiopian Community in Seattle ↗
- Who funds VILLA COMUNITARIA ↗
- Who funds ERITREAN ASSOCIATION IN GREATER SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds HMONG ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds Somali Bridge ↗
- Who funds HORN OF AFRICA SERVICES ↗
- Who funds East African Community Services ↗
- Who funds Para Los Ninos de Highline ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF ZAMBIANS IN SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds UNITED TERRITORIES OF PACIFIC ISLANDERS WASHINGTON-UTOPIA WA ↗
- Who funds SERVE ETHIOPIANS WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds FANIKIA FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · United Way of King County · Inatai Foundation · Philanthropy Northwest · Sheng-Yen Lu Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Gates Foundation · School's Out Washington · Building Changes · Northwest Harvest Emm · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Colectiva Legal del Pueblo
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Healthierhere funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.