Skip to content
Healthconnect One at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Healthconnect One

HEALTHCONNECT ONE (hc one) is the national leader in advancing equitable, community-based, peer-to-peer support for pregnancy, birth, breastfeeding and early parenting.

$349k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$49k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$405kHuman Services$29kCommunity Improvement$5k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $341,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $349,184 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $7,684 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$49,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
O COMMUNITY DOULAS$49,000
KENNEDY'S ANGEL GOWNS$49,000
CELEBRATE ONE$49,000
THE BIRTHING PLACE FOUNDATION$49,000
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OHIO & INDIANA$49,000
HEALTHY MOTHERS HEALTHY BABIES COALITION$49,000
SISTAS CARING 4 SISTAS$27,500
CHERISHING LIFE BEGINNINGS$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $67k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BREASTFEEDING TASK FORCE OF GREATER LA: $5k → 14%COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO: $7k → 23%BLACK MOTHERS BREASTFEEDING ASSOCIATION: $5k → 21%KENNEDY'S ANGEL GOWNS: $49k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
OH
CA
UT
NE
VA
AZ
NM
NC
OK
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

10%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$45k · 3 repeat orgs$394k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +269% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
9

Total granted

$45k
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+269%
+39%

Still filing today

67%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $342k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’25
Human ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    COMUNIDAD MATERNA EN UTAH
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k · revenue +269%
  • TO
    TOUCH OF GOLD
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k
  • TI
    THE INTUNE MOTHER SOCIETY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k

Funded once

  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +45%
  • M
    MODABA
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO BREASTFEEDING TASK FORCE
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ubuntu Black Family Wellness Collective

Ubuntu Black Family Wellness Collective is a free and charitable clinic and social safety net. Ubuntu Black Family Wellness Collective serves Black pregnant and parenting mamas, their babies and children through community-based, holistic…

Health
2
Mama Bird Doula Services

To improve the outcomes for Black Indigenous and People of Color, BIPOC, maternal health and their babies in our community.

Health
3
Project Milk Mission

Project milk mission is at the forefront of a vital mission - reducing infant mortality rates by championing breastfeeding, with a special focus on supporting low-income african american mothers. through comprehensive services spanning the…

Food & Nutrition
4
Black Mamas Community Collective

The mission of Black Mamas ATX is to ensure that Black women survive and thrive before, during and after childbirth. We envision a world without maternal health disparities. Our goal is to reduce and ultimately eliminate the alarming…

Human Services
5
Melanin and Motherhood Maternal Wellness

Charitable and Educational

Health
6
National Association to Advance Black Birth

combat the effects of structural racism within maternal and infoant health to advance black birth outcomes

Health
7
Breast Friends Lactation and Support Services

Mission: To increase breastfeeding rates in the Black and Brown community with individual consultation group education and community lactation training. To offer affordable lactation consultation and free support to our clients. We will…

Human Services
8
The Mama Glow Foundation

The Foundation strives to improve maternal health outcomes in three primary ways. They are: Providing scholarships to aspiring doulas and midwives, Engaging in professional development pathways for our doulas, and Working with educational…

Human Services
9
Texas Doula Association
Health
10
Dc Breastfeeding Coalition

Mission of organization is to increase the breastfeeding rates of all infants living in the district of columbia by partnering with maternal and child health professionals.

Health
11
California Breastfeeding Coalition

To improve the health and well-being of californians by working collaboratively to protect, promote and support breastfeeding

Health
12
Perinatal Health Equity Foundation

PHEI works to end health disparities in Black maternal and infant care through advocacy, education, and community action. We empower Black birthing people with support, resources, and connections for equitable health outcomes.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthy Mothers Healthy Babies Coalition of Ga Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kennedys Angel Gowns Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
6/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNI T: $49,000 · OtherCOMMUNI TBIRTHING PLACE FOUNDATION INC: $49,000 · OtherBIRTHING PLACE FOUNDATION INCHEALTHY MOTHERS HEALTHY BABIES COALITION OF GA INC: $49,000 · OtherHEALTHY MOTHERS HEALTHY BABIES COALITION OF GA INCVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OHIO & INDIANA: $49,000 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OHIO & INDIANACHERISHING LIFE BEGINNINGS: $20,000 · OtherCHERISHING LIFE BEGINNINGSCOMUNIDAD MATERNA EN UTAH: $15,000 · OtherCOMUNIDAD MATERNA EN UTAHTOUCH OF GOLD: $15,000 · OtherTOUCH OF GOLD+2 more: $12,600 · OtherCELEBRATEONE: $49,000 · HealthCELEBRATEONESistas Caring 4 Sistas Inc: $27,500 · HealthSistas Caring 4 Sistas IncTHE INTUNE MOTHER SOCIETY: $15,000 · HealthTHE INTUNE MOTHER SOCIETYNEW MEXICO BREASTFEEDING TASK FORCE: $6,000 · HealthNEW MEXICO BREASTFEEDING T…MINNESOTA BREASTFEEDING COALITION: $5,400 · HealthKENNEDYS ANGEL GOWNS INC: $49,000 · Human ServicesKENNEDYS ANGEL GOWNS…COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO INC: $7,200 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION AGE…The Breastfeeding Task Force of Greater Los Angeles: $5,400 · Human ServicesThe Breastfeeding Ta…Chicago Volunteer Doulas Inc: $5,400 · Human ServicesChicago Volunteer Do…Alimentacion Segura Infantil Asi: $5,400 · Human ServicesAlimentacion Segura …BLACK MOTHERS BREASTFEEDING ASSOCIATION: $5,400 · Human ServicesBLACK MOTHERS BREAST…
Other$258,600Health$102,900Human Services$77,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEALTHY MOTHERS HEALTHY BABIES COALITION OF GA INC: $49,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetSistas Caring 4 Sistas Inc: $27,500 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetCOMUNIDAD MATERNA EN UTAH: $15,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetTHE INTUNE MOTHER SOCIETY: $15,000 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO INC: $7,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW MEXICO BREASTFEEDING TASK FORCE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Breastfeeding Task Force of Greater Los Angeles: $5,400 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetChicago Volunteer Doulas Inc: $5,400 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBLACK MOTHERS BREASTFEEDING ASSOCIATION: $5,400 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMINNESOTA BREASTFEEDING COALITION: $5,400 over 1y, 4.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

WK Kellogg FoundationAmazonsmile FoundationFidelity Investments …
WK Kellogg FoundationMI14× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: WK Kellogg Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Healthconnect One funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Healthconnect One. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Healthconnect One?

    Find your warmest path to Healthconnect One through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Healthconnect One’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home