· Public charity
Healthconnect One
HEALTHCONNECT ONE (hc one) is the national leader in advancing equitable, community-based, peer-to-peer support for pregnancy, birth, breastfeeding and early parenting.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $341,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $349,184 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $7,684 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE BIRTHING PLACE FOUNDATION | $49,000 |
| VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OHIO & INDIANA | $49,000 |
| O COMMUNITY DOULAS | $49,000 |
| KENNEDY'S ANGEL GOWNS | $49,000 |
| CELEBRATE ONE | $49,000 |
| HEALTHY MOTHERS HEALTHY BABIES COALITION | $49,000 |
| SISTAS CARING 4 SISTAS | $27,500 |
| CHERISHING LIFE BEGINNINGS | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $67k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +269% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $342k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CMCOMUNIDAD MATERNA EN UTAH2× · 2022–2023 · $15k · revenue +269%
- TITHE INTUNE MOTHER SOCIETY2× · 2022–2023 · $15k
- TOTOUCH OF GOLD2× · 2022–2023 · $15k
Funded once
- CACOMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO INCone grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +20%
- MMODABAone grant, 2022 · $7k
- NMNEW MEXICO BREASTFEEDING TASK FORCEone grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue +12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ubuntu Black Family Wellness Collective is a free and charitable clinic and social safety net. Ubuntu Black Family Wellness Collective serves Black pregnant and parenting mamas, their babies and children through community-based, holistic…
The mission of Black Mamas ATX is to ensure that Black women survive and thrive before, during and after childbirth. We envision a world without maternal health disparities. Our goal is to reduce and ultimately eliminate the alarming…
combat the effects of structural racism within maternal and infoant health to advance black birth outcomes
Project milk mission is at the forefront of a vital mission - reducing infant mortality rates by championing breastfeeding, with a special focus on supporting low-income african american mothers. through comprehensive services spanning the…
To improve the outcomes for Black Indigenous and People of Color, BIPOC, maternal health and their babies in our community.
Mission: To increase breastfeeding rates in the Black and Brown community with individual consultation group education and community lactation training. To offer affordable lactation consultation and free support to our clients. We will…
Charitable and Educational
The Foundation strives to improve maternal health outcomes in three primary ways. They are: Providing scholarships to aspiring doulas and midwives, Engaging in professional development pathways for our doulas, and Working with educational…
The Maternal Coalition (TMC) mission is to ensure all pregnant and parenting people have access to just and equitable healthcare
To promote equity in perinatal wellness and strengthen cultures of support for infants and caregivers through preventative knowledge-sharing, collaborative exploration, and proactive community engagement.
PHEI works to end health disparities in Black maternal and infant care through advocacy, education, and community action. We empower Black birthing people with support, resources, and connections for equitable health outcomes.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthy Mothers Healthy Babies Coalition of Ga Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kennedys Angel Gowns Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CELEBRATEONE ↗
- Who funds KENNEDYS ANGEL GOWNS INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY MOTHERS HEALTHY BABIES COALITION OF GA INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNI T ↗
- Who funds Sistas Caring 4 Sistas Inc ↗
- Who funds COMUNIDAD MATERNA EN UTAH ↗
- Who funds THE INTUNE MOTHER SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO INC ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO BREASTFEEDING TASK FORCE ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA BREASTFEEDING COALITION ↗
- Who funds Alimentacion Segura Infantil Asi ↗
- Who funds The Breastfeeding Task Force of Greater Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds Chicago Volunteer Doulas Inc ↗
- Who funds BLACK MOTHERS BREASTFEEDING ASSOCIATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: WK Kellogg Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Healthconnect One funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Healthconnect One?
Find your warmest path to Healthconnect One through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.