Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

He Anderson Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$474k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$159k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$1.2MHealth$767kReligion$304kYouth Development$206kCommunity Improvement$107kArts & Culture$92kRecreation & Sports$36kAnimals$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $111k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $334k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PATRICK CATHOLIC CHURCH$159,000
ANNIE WRIGHT SCHOOLS$125,000
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON$50,000
PACIFIC LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY$45,000
ARCHDIOCESE OF PORTLAND IN OREGON$30,000
REMEMBERING AMERICAS HEROES$26,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH PUGET SOUND - GREAT FUTURES SCHOLARS FUND$10,000
NORTHWEST ACADEMY$8,000
PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITY SCHOOL$8,000
VILLAGE VOLUNTEERS$6,000
UNIVERSITY PLACE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$3,000
THE DON BOSCO CENTERS$1,500
INDIGO RESCUE$1,000
DUKE CATHOLIC CENTER CO DUKE UNIVERSITY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%A WORKING FAMILY'S CHRISTMAS: $2k → 9%THE DON BOSCO CENTERS: $2k → 15%DON BOSCO CENTERS: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
OR
CA
MO
TN
NC
HI
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 15% of He Anderson Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in OR; read by stated purpose it is 85% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

He Anderson Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.8% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.6M · 24 repeat orgs$195k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
33

Total granted

$2.6M
$189k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
-2%

Still filing today

54%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MULTICARE FOUNDATIONS
    7× · 2017–2023 · $751k · revenue +163%
  • AW
    ANNIE WRIGHT SCHOOLS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $406k · revenue +71%
  • PL
    Pacific Lutheran University
    8× · 2017–2024 · $290k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF OREGON ENDOWMENT SCHOLARSHIP
    one grant, 2017 · $42k
  • LB
    LAKEWOOD BASEBALL CLUB INC
    one grant, 2019 · $22k
  • KS
    KAPPA SIGMA GAMMA ALPHA
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
2
Pomona College

Throughout its history, pomona college has educated men and women of exceptional promise. we gather individuals, regardless of financial circumstances, into a small residential community that is strongly rooted in southern california yet…

Education
3
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
4
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
5
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
6
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
7
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
8
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
9
University of Portland

The university of portland, an independently governed catholic university guided by the congregation of holy cross, addresses significant questions of human concern through interdisciplinary studies of the arts, sciences, and humanities…

Education
10
The Northwest School of the Arts Humanities and Environment

We offer an outstanding international college preparatory program for grades 6-12.

Education
11
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

12
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Village Volunteers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-8 SchoolsVeteran Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and AdoptionCancer Support OrganizationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Senior Support ServicesLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Classical Music EnsemblesCommunity Arts OrganizationsYouth Sports Booster Organi…Youth Development CentersCommunity Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 50 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr14%13%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr18%22%20–35yr13%9%35–55yr15%48%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr18%7%20–35yr13%1%35–55yr15%63%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
12%
4,745/38,940

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
14/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ANNIE WRIGHT SCHOOLS — $406,380 · OtherANNIE WRIGHT SCHOOLSST PATRICK CATHOLIC CHURCH — $195,000 · OtherST PATRICK CATHOLIC CHURCHUNIVERSITY OF OREGON — $175,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF OREGONBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH PUGET — $80,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH PUGETBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB — $56,400 · OtherPACIFIC CREST COMMUNITY SCHOOL — $49,000 · OtherST FRANCIS CABRINI — $45,900 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF OREGON ENDOWMENT SCHOLARSHIP — $41,764 · Other+33 more — $193,200 · Other+33 moreMULTICARE FOUNDATIONS — $751,201 · HealthMULTICARE FOUNDATIONS+5 more — $12,900 · HealthPacific Lutheran University — $290,000 · EducationPacific Lutheran Univ…UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION — $199,592 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OREGON …THE NORTHWEST ACADEMY — $39,000 · EducationTHE NORTHWEST ACADEMY+1 more — $10,000 · EducationJUNIOR LEAGUE OF PORTLAND OREGON INC — $103,400 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF TACOMA INC — $3,570 · Community ImprovementBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH PUGET SOUND — $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentUNIVERSITY CLUB FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 · Recreation & SportsSoccer In the Streets Inc — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsREMEMBERING AMERICA'S HEROES — $42,000 · Arts & CultureFort Worth Opera Association Inc — $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,242,644Health$764,101Education$538,592Community Improvement$106,970Youth Development$60,000Recreation & Sports$55,000Arts & Culture$47,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMULTICARE FOUNDATIONS — $751,201 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetANNIE WRIGHT SCHOOLS — $406,380 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetPacific Lutheran University — $290,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION — $199,592 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF PORTLAND OREGON INC — $103,400 over 6y, 17% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH PUGET SOUND — $60,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY CLUB FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetREMEMBERING AMERICA'S HEROES — $42,000 over 6y, 40% of budgetTHE NORTHWEST ACADEMY — $39,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGAMMA ALPHA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATION OF JUNIOR LEAGUES INTERNATIONAL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINDIGO RESCUE INC — $10,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetSoccer In the Streets Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDONT MIND ME FOUNDATION — $6,400 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetVILLAGE VOLUNTEERS — $6,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetFort Worth Opera Association Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DON BOSCO CENTERS — $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF TACOMA INC — $3,570 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetChildrens Center — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetA Working Familys Christmas — $2,400 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE HOSPITAL — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MULTICARE FOUNDATIONS
  • Who funds ANNIE WRIGHT SCHOOLS
  • Who funds Pacific Lutheran University
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF PORTLAND OREGON INC
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH PUGET SOUND
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY CLUB FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds REMEMBERING AMERICA'S HEROES
  • Who funds THE NORTHWEST ACADEMY
  • Who funds GAMMA ALPHA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE ASSOCIATION OF JUNIOR LEAGUES INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds INDIGO RESCUE INC
  • Who funds Soccer In the Streets Inc
  • Who funds DONT MIND ME FOUNDATION
  • Who funds VILLAGE VOLUNTEERS
  • Who funds Fort Worth Opera Association Inc
  • Who funds THE DON BOSCO CENTERS
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF TACOMA INC
  • Who funds Childrens Center
  • Who funds A Working Familys Christmas
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR15.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Dimmer Family Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization He Anderson Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Childrens Center0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph