Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Hba Charitable Foundation

Building pathways and improving lives in our community.

$146k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$76k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$634kHuman Services$59kHousing & Shelter$51kFood & Nutrition$24kYouth Development$3k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$75,809
Median grant
1
States reached
$327k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNION HIGH SCHOOL$75,809
BROKEN ARROW HIGH SCHOOL$70,300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $56k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$632k · 6 repeat orgs$139k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
5

Total granted

$632k
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+141%
+221%

Still filing today

67%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
EducationHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • REVITALIZE T-TOWN
    2× · 2018–2019 · $45k · revenue +141%
  • COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $24k · revenue +33%
  • OS
    Oklahoma State University Foundation
    3× · 2017–2019 · $16k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • FC
    Family & Childrens Services Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $56k · revenue +221%
  • OE
    Owasso Education Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +7%
  • TR
    Tulsa Regional STEM Alliance Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +31%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Foundation for Tulsa Schools

The Foundation for Tulsa Schools was established to build a stronger community through the support of Tulsa Public Schools.

Education
2
Tulsa Legacy Charter School

To prepare students for college through a rigorous arts infused program.

Education
3
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
4
Tulsa Neighborhood Networks Inc

Provide the poor of the city of tulsa, oklahoma an opportunity to improve their quality of life through guidance and training in the areas of education, employment, family skills, healthcare, housing, socialization and spirituality.

Community Improvement
5
Cdfi Friendly Tulsa Inc

CDFI Friendly Tulsa is bringing capital to Tulsa to address a range of unmet financing needs in communities of color.

Public Benefit
6
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

7
Tulsa Community Service Center Inc

Provide financial and supplement assistance to the tulsa area communities

Human Services
8
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

9
Tulsa County Bar Foundation Inc

To promote ethical conduct among attorneys, to advance the effective administration of our judicial system, to ensure equal access to justice for all citizens and to engender respect for the legal profession, the law and the governing…

Crime & Legal
10
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

11
Oklahoma Tennis Foundation

Oklahoma Tennis Foundation positively impacts lives by supporting & funding organizations that promote tennis & education throughout the great State of Oklahoma.

Recreation & Sports
12
Tulsa Community Loan Fund Inc

To support community efforts to provide a greater supply of affordable housing in tulsa county and the surrounding area.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tulsa Regional Stem Alliance Inc and the most unlike its peers is Owasso Education Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNION HIGH SCHOOL — $369,572 · OtherUNION HIGH SCHOOLNATHAN HALE HIGH SCHOOL — $171,597 · OtherNATHAN HALE HIGH SCHOOLBROKEN ARROW HIGH SCHOOL — $70,300 · OtherBROKEN ARROW HIGH SCHOOL+1 more — $2,832 · OtherFamily & Childrens Services Inc — $55,727 · Human ServicesREVITALIZE T-TOWN — $44,742 · Housing & ShelterTULSA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $6,000 · Housing & ShelterOklahoma State University Foundation — $15,734 · EducationOwasso Education Foundation Inc — $4,500 · EducationTulsa Regional STEM Alliance Inc — $3,000 · EducationTULSA HONOR ACADEMY INC — $2,500 · EducationCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC — $24,161 · Food & Nutrition
Other$614,301Human Services$55,727Housing & Shelter$50,742Education$25,734Food & Nutrition$24,161

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFamily & Childrens Services Inc — $55,727 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREVITALIZE T-TOWN — $44,742 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC — $24,161 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation — $15,734 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOwasso Education Foundation Inc — $4,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTULSA HONOR ACADEMY INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · Zarrow Families Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hba Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Family & Childrens Services Inc1% of income from government
  • Tulsa Habitat for Humanity Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph