Skip to content

· Public charity

Hazon Inc

Hazon is leading a transformative movement weaving sustainability into the fabric of jewish life, in order to create a healthier, more sustainable, and more equitable world for all.

$1.1M
Granted FY2018
9
Grants FY2018
5
States reached
$123k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Religion$434kEnvironment$269kFood & Nutrition$53kRecreation & Sports$45kArts & Culture$25kYouth Development$15kPhilanthropy$10k
02FY2018 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $380,545, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,064,346 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $683,801 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $315k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
URBAN ADAMAH$122,500
PEARLSTONE RETREAT CENTER$100,000
WILDERNESS TORAH$92,500
EDEN VILLAGE CAMP$25,295
JEWISH FARM SCHOOL$10,000
SHORESH FOUNDATION$10,000
AMIR$10,000
RAMAH IN THE ROCKIES$5,250
ABUNDANCE FARM$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ABUNDANCE FARM: $11k → 12%JEWISH FARM SCHOOL: $14k → 22%WILDERNESS TORAH: $112k → 10%CAMP TAWONGA: $6k → 10%SHORESH FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%AMIR: $10k → 16%EDEN VILLAGE CAMP: $25k → 6%AFTER OIL IS SAID AND DONE: $25k → 14%RAMAH IN THE ROCKIES: $5k → 12%PEARLSTONE RETREAT CENTER: $130k → 11%ABUNDANCE FARM: $5k → 12%JEWISH FARM SCHOOL: $10k → 22%WILDERNESS TORAH: $93k → 10%EDEN VILLAGE CAMP: $14k → 6%EKAR FARM: $13k → 12%PEARLSTONE RETREAT CENTER: $100k → 11%URBAN ADAMAH: $146k → 10%URBAN ADAMAH: $123k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$781k · 6 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$781k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+2255%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
EnvironmentReligionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UA
    Urban Adamah
    2× · 2017–2018 · $269k · revenue +3%
  • AI
    ADAMAH INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $230k · revenue +231%
  • EV
    EDEN VILLAGE CAMP INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $39k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • AO
    AFTER OIL IS SAID AND DONE
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • E
    EKARgraduated
    2× · 2017–2020 · $13k · revenue ×24
  • TJ
    TAWONGA JEWISH COMMUNITY CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +64%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gan Israel Chabad Inc

Operation of summer day camp and overnight camp which combines activities with a Torah education

Recreation & Sports
2
Institute of Soil and Soul

The institute of soil and soul is a nonprofit jewish community farm that practices regenerative agriculture, donates all of its produce to local food pantries, and provides agricultural education rooted in jewish wisdom. our mission is to…

Food & Nutrition
3
Jewish Farmer Network

To cultivate the social, cultural, and spiritual well-being of Jewish farmers.

Religion
4
Denver Academy of Torah

Denver academy of torah (the "school")provides education to students from kindergarten through high school. the school's mission is to nuture students to be torah-observant role models and future leaders through an intellectually rigorous…

Education
5
Jewish Reconstructionist Camping Corporation

Incredibly diverse and welcoming communities where we encourage children to discover what being jewish means to themno matter who they are or where they come from.

Recreation & Sports
6
Ganei Beantown Inc

We are building community through hands-on food systems education rooted in Jewish text, tradition and culture. We support Jewish institutions to create initiatives such as learning gardens, run experiential programs, and host pluralistic…

Education
7
Valley Beit Midrash

Religious educationvalley beit midrash is a forward thinking pluralistic organization rooted in jewish ethics that is committed to improving lives in our community through torah learning, social action, and leadership development

Education
8
Camp Morasha Inc

Camp Morasha integrates the best in informal and formal education in all of its programming and activities through a transformative and fun, co-ed, summer experience for Jewish youth. The camp inspires and develops the minds, bodies,…

Religion
9
Camp Ramah in Northern California

Camp ramah in northern california engages the members of our camp community in joyful, transformative experiences that serve as a model for lifelong jewish learning and practice, commitment to klal yisrael (israel and the jewish…

Recreation & Sports
10
Dorot Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Yeshivat Chovevei Torah Rabbinical School Ltd (Formerly the Meorot Inst)

To train rabbis, educators, and leaders who embody this vision in their teaching of torah, their spiritual support of individuals, and their building of diverse and welcoming communities; to foster and strengthen a network of rabbis and…

Education
12
Yeshivath Gesher

Yeshivath Gesher is a local Jewish School whose primary purposes are to strengthen the religious, moral and intellectual welfare of its members, their families and the community. The Yeshiva also promotes the principles of the Orthodox…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eden Village Camp Inc; the most unlike its peers is Shoresh Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Urban Adamah: $268,875 · EnvironmentUrban AdamahWilderness Torah: $204,100 · EnvironmentWilderness TorahADAMAH INC: $229,500 · ReligionADAMAH INC+1 more: $6,000 · ReligionAFTER OIL IS SAID AND DONE: $25,000 · OtherAFTER OIL IS …JEWISH FARM SCHOOL: $23,895 · OtherJEWISH FARM S…CONGREGATION BNAI ISRAEL: $16,000 · OtherCONGREGATION …EKAR: $13,150 · OtherEKARSHORESH FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherSHORESH FOUND…AMIR: $10,000 · OtherAMIREDEN VILLAGE CAMP INC: $38,795 · Recreation & SportsRAMAH IN THE ROCKIES: $5,250 · Recreation & Sports
Environment$472,975Religion$235,500Other$98,045Recreation & Sports$44,045

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUrban Adamah: $268,875 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetADAMAH INC: $229,500 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetWilderness Torah: $204,100 over 3y, 14% of budgetEDEN VILLAGE CAMP INC: $38,795 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetJEWISH FARM SCHOOL: $23,895 over 3y, 11% of budgetTAWONGA JEWISH COMMUNITY CORPORATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAMAH IN THE ROCKIES: $5,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Harold Grinspoon FoundationMA19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Harold Grinspoon Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Upstart Bay Area · Jewish Communal Fund · Adamah Inc · Jewish Community Federation of the Greater East Bay · Covenant Foundation · JEWISHColorado · Rose Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hazon Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hazon Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Adamah Inc: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hazon’s filings →

More from the funding graph