Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hazel Ruby McQuain Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11M
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5.1M
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$20MRecreation & Sports$12MHealth$5.7MPublic Benefit$4.0MEnvironment$3.5MFood & Nutrition$3.4MHuman Services$3.0MYouth Development$647kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $380k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $202k
  • $250k+4 grants · $10M
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$123M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$5,098,966
MYLAN PARK FOUNDATION INC$3,000,000
WV GAME CHANGERS$1,327,352
CITY OF MORGANTOWN$850,000
SUNDALE NURSING HOME$141,633
SHACK NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE$60,000
PRESTON COUNTY WORKSHOP$48,470
MORGANTOWN AREA MEALS ON WHEELS$45,000
SCOTTS RUN SETTLEMENT HOUSE$40,000
MON RIVERS TRAIL CONSERVANCY$40,000
CASA FOR KIDS$35,000
VISITING HOMEMAKERS$30,000
ROSENBAUM FAMILY HOUSE$25,000
CHRISTIAN HELP$25,000
MOUNTAIN LINE TRANSIT AUTHORITY$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $395k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SHACK NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $60k → 19%SHACK NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $60k → 19%SHACK NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $20k → 19%SHACK NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $20k → 19%SHACK NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $20k → 19%SHACK NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $20k → 19%OPERATION WELCOME HOME: $15k → 19%OPERATION WELCOME HOME: $15k → 19%OPERATION WELCOME HOME: $15k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP: $25k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP: $25k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP: $25k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP: $25k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP: $25k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP: $25k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Hazel Ruby McQuain Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in WV; by stated purpose, 88%.

Hazel Ruby McQuain Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$53M · 42 repeat orgs$959k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
13

Total granted

$53M
$743k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+27%

Still filing today

50%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $216k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MP
    MYLAN PARK FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $12M · revenue +144% · 77% of their budget
  • WG
    WV GAME CHANGERS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $3.6M · revenue +600% · 62% of their budget
  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA BOTANIC GARDEN INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $3.3M · revenue +158% · 54% of their budget

Funded once

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES
    one grant, 2021 · $326k
  • MA
    MONONGALIA ADVOCACY CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $175k
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $65k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philanthropy West Virginia Inc

Strengthening philanthropy in the mountain state.

Philanthropy
2
Mountaineer Community Health Center

To provide primary medical care service in a rural community.

Health
3
Mountain State Justice Inc

Mountain state justice provides free legal services to low income people in west virginia and assures that low income people have access to the court system.

Crime & Legal
4
Monongalia Emergency Medical Services Inc

To set and carry out emergency medical services planning, development and implementation in monongalia county, west virginia, and the surrounding service area; to provide, maintain and operate emergency ambulance, rescue and transportation…

Health
5
West Virginia Manufacturers Association

Trade association for wv manufacturers.

—
6
Marion County Rescue Squad Inc

To provide quality ambulance service to the residents of marion county, west virginia.

—
7
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
8
West Virginia State University Research & Development Corporation

To foster, support, and assist in any research and economic development activities consistent with the educational objectives and mission of west virginia state university.

—
9
Wv Helping Hands
Human Services
10
Community Care of West Virginia Inc

The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…

—
11
West Virginia Rural Water Association Inc

The organization provides training and technical assistance to water and wastewater utility providers throughout the State of West Virginia through a variety of programs.

—
12
West Virginia Chamber of Commerce

The west virginia chamber of commerce provides opportunities for broad based prosperity throughout west virginia.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Preston County Workshop Inc; the most unlike its peers is Preston County Youth Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
15/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $19,998,386 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCMYLAN PARK FOUNDATION INC: $12,100,000 · EducationMYLAN PARK FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $600 · EducationCITY OF MORGANTOWN: $4,042,000 · OtherCITY OF MORGANTOWNUNITED WAY OF MONONGALIA & PRESTON COUNTY: $3,085,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF MONONGALIA …SALVATION ARMY: $1,557,814 · OtherSALVATION ARMYUniversity of Michigan: $1,000,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganMON HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $458,990 · Other+37 more: $1,984,600 · Other+37 moreWV GAME CHANGERS INC: $3,636,236 · HealthWV GAME C…MILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT INC: $625,000 · HealthMILAN PUS…+4 more: $144,600 · HealthWEST VIRGINIA BOTANIC GARDEN INC: $3,308,664 · EnvironmentSCOTTS RUN SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC: $240,000 · Human ServicesSHACK NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN HELP INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $65,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION WELCOME HOME: $45,000 · Human ServicesPRESTON COUNTY YOUTH CENTER INC: $576,710 · Youth DevelopmentMORGANTOWN AREA MEALS ON WHEELS: $270,000 · Food & NutritionTHE PANTRY PLUS MORE INC: $58,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$32,098,986Other$12,128,404Health$4,405,836Environment$3,308,664Human Services$700,000Youth Development$576,710Food & Nutrition$328,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $19,998,386 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetMYLAN PARK FOUNDATION INC: $12,100,000 over 5y, 77% of budgetWV GAME CHANGERS INC: $3,636,236 over 5y, 62% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA BOTANIC GARDEN INC: $3,308,664 over 3y, 54% of budgetMILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT INC: $625,000 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetPRESTON COUNTY YOUTH CENTER INC: $576,710 over 2y, 49% of budgetMORGANTOWN AREA MEALS ON WHEELS: $270,000 over 6y, 17% of budgetSCOTTS RUN SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC: $240,000 over 6y, 7.5% of budgetSHACK NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $200,000 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetCHRISTIAN HELP INC: $150,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetON EAGLES' WINGS INC: $92,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetCOMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $90,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $65,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PANTRY PLUS MORE INC: $58,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPRESTON COUNTY WORKSHOP INC: $48,470 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetOPERATION WELCOME HOME: $45,000 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetFLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES INC: $29,573 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetWEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPRICKETT'S FORT MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $9,400 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetRAPE AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INFORMATION C: $2,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMONONGALIA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $600 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMORGANTOWN HIGH SCHOOL BAND AUXILLIARY: $600 over 6y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MYLAN PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WV GAME CHANGERS INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA BOTANIC GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds MILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESTON COUNTY YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MORGANTOWN AREA MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds SCOTTS RUN SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SHACK NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN HELP INC ↗
  • Who funds ON EAGLES' WINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds THE PANTRY PLUS MORE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESTON COUNTY WORKSHOP INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION WELCOME HOME ↗
  • Who funds FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Milan Puskar Foundation IncWV32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Milan Puskar Foundation Inc · George D Hott Foundation · United Way of Monongalia and Preston Counites Inc · John M Brown Family Foundation · Your Community Foundation of North Central Wv Inc · Empty Bowls Monongalia · Weldon Family Foundation · Lynch Foundation Inc · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · Firstenergy Foundation · Charles R Nailler Memorial Foundation · Mylan Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hazel Ruby McQuain Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hazel Ruby McQuain Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hazel Ruby McQuain’s filings →

    More from the funding graph