Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Private foundation

Charles R Nailler Memorial Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$280k
Granted FY2023
11
Grants FY2023
11
Organizations funded FY2023
27%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2023
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2023
$99,650
Organizations funded a year
8 to 14
FY2018 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
2
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 27% of the organizations Charles R Nailler Memorial Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 13% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesEducationCrime & LegalFood & NutritionHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202311$280k27%
FY202213$93k8%
FY202114$87k50%
FY202012$60k8%
FY201911$53k36%
FY20188$70kn/a
91% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Human Services$153kRecreation & Sports$122kReligion$76kFood & Nutrition$56kArts & Culture$52kEducation$50kHealth$39kCrime & Legal$36kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 16 grantees
All grantees of Charles R Nailler Memorial Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Chestnut Mountain Ranch Inc$124,65033%
Mylan Park Foundation Inc$100,00051%
Monongalia County Child Advocacy Center Inc$36,00042%
The Community Kitchen Inc$33,97551%
Edventure Group Inc$30,40050%
Stepping Stones Inc$25,00041%
On Eagles' Wings Inc$22,50034%
West Virginia Public Theatre Inc$20,00042%
West Liberty University Foundation Inc$20,00020%
Milan Puskar Health Right Inc$16,00030%
National Aviary in Pittsburgh Inc$14,00030%
Morgantown Theatre Company$12,00018%
Oglebay Foundation Inc$12,00020%
Wheeling Symphony Society Inc$10,00020%
West Virginia Filmmakers Guild Inc$10,0001n/a
West Virginia Botanic Garden Inc$2,28010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 8 recipients with no EIN on record ($155k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Charles R Nailler Memorial Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChestnut Mountain Ranch Inc: $124,650 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetMylan Park Foundation Inc: $100,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetMonongalia County Child Advocacy Center Inc: $36,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetThe Community Kitchen Inc: $33,975 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetEdventure Group Inc: $30,400 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetStepping Stones Inc: $25,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetOn Eagles' Wings Inc: $22,500 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetWest Virginia Public Theatre Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetWest Liberty University Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMilan Puskar Health Right Inc: $16,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNational Aviary in Pittsburgh Inc: $14,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMorgantown Theatre Company: $12,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetOglebay Foundation Inc: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWheeling Symphony Society Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWest Virginia Botanic Garden Inc: $2,280 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 15.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Milan Puskar Foundation IncWV19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Milan Puskar Foundation Inc · Hazel Ruby McQuain Charitable Trust · Your Community Foundation of North Central Wv Inc · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · Eqt Foundation · Weldon Family Foundation · John M Brown Family Foundation · George D Hott Foundation · George W Bowers Family Charitable Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Charles R Nailler Memorial Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Charles R Nailler Memorial Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Charles R Nailler Memorial Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Charles R Nailler Memorial Foundation

How much does Charles R Nailler Memorial Foundation give?
Charles R Nailler Memorial Foundation reported 11 grants totaling $280,000 in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 14 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2023.
What does Charles R Nailler Memorial Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2023, its largest causes are Human Services (24%), Recreation & Sports (19%), Religion (12%).
Who are Charles R Nailler Memorial Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2023: Chestnut Mountain Ranch Inc ($125k), Mylan Park Foundation Inc ($100k), Monongalia County Child Advocacy Center Inc ($36k).
Does Charles R Nailler Memorial Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 27% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Charles R Nailler Memorial Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Charles R Nailler Memorial Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Milan Puskar Foundation Inc, Hazel Ruby McQuain Charitable Trust, Your Community Foundation of North Central Wv Inc.
Where is Charles R Nailler Memorial Foundation based?
Charles R Nailler Memorial Foundation is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles R Nailler Memorial’s filings →

More from the funding graph