· Private foundation
Charles R Nailler Memorial Foundation
Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k5 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $88k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $160k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH | $99,650 |
| Mylan Park Foundation INC | $60,000 |
| WESLEY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $47,400 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,600 |
| WEST VIRGINIA FILMMAKERS GUILD | $10,000 |
| MONONGALIA COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER | $10,000 |
| Community Kitchen INC | $9,150 |
| ON EAGLES' WINGS | $7,500 |
| SPRUCE ST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $5,500 |
| THE EDVENTURE GROUP | $5,200 |
| AVERY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2023, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CMCHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH INC3× · 2021–2023 · $125k · revenue +49%
- MPMYLAN PARK FOUNDATION INC5× · 2019–2023 · $100k · revenue +481%
- TCTHE COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC5× · 2019–2023 · $34k · revenue +77%
Funded once
- MTMorgantown Theatre Companygraduatedone grant, 2018 · $12k · revenue +77%
- TMTLC MINISTRIESone grant, 2022 · $5k
- TMTLC MINISTREIESone grant, 2021 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Strengthening philanthropy in the mountain state.
To provide primary medical care service in a rural community.
Childrens day care center
Our purpose is to establish an educational foundation of curiosity, confidence, and competence while practicing kindness to oneself, the community and nature.
Waynesburg university educates students to make connections between faith, learning and serving so they might faithfully transofrm their communiities and the world. see continuation on schedule o.as a christian comprehensive university, we…
The uwmpc enhances the quality of life in our community by helping those in need. we serve as a leader in building a stronger and healthier community by developing resources and creating partnerships to empower individuals to improve their…
The wvnpa is a membership association dedicated to serving west virginia's nonprofit sector by providing year-round programming, serving as a clearing house of information, tools and resources through our website, and connect the sector…
Promotion of tourism
To provide a safe, secure, and nurturing atmosphere in which each child may develop and grow emotionally, socially, intellectually, and physically by receiving a well-rounded experience based on montessori philosophy.
To promote golfing throughout west virginia
Mountain state justice provides free legal services to low income people in west virginia and assures that low income people have access to the court system.
To help revitalize downtown Martinsburg, WV
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia Public Theatre Inc and the most unlike its peers is On Eagles' Wings Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds MYLAN PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MONONGALIA COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds EDVENTURE GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds STEPPING STONES INC ↗
- Who funds ON EAGLES' WINGS INC ↗
- Who funds WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA PUBLIC THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds MILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL AVIARY IN PITTSBURGH INC ↗
- Who funds OGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Morgantown Theatre Company ↗
- Who funds WHEELING SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA BOTANIC GARDEN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Milan Puskar Foundation Inc · Hazel Ruby McQuain Charitable Trust · Your Community Foundation of North Central Wv Inc · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · Eqt Foundation · Weldon Family Foundation · John M Brown Family Foundation · George D Hott Foundation · George W Bowers Family Charitable Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Charles R Nailler Memorial Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Charles R Nailler Memorial Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Charles R Nailler Memorial Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.