Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Weldon Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$198kFood & Nutrition$107kEnvironment$60kRecreation & Sports$33kHealth$32kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kReligion$5kAnimals$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRISTIAN HELP INC$12,000
WV BLACKHILLS FREE METHODIST CAMP$10,000
CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH$6,000
PANTRY PLUS MORE INC$5,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WV$5,000
COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $183k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WV: $6k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WV: $5k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WV: $5k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WV: $5k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WV: $5k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WV: $5k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WV: $4k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WV: $2k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WV: $1k → 15%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $12k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $18k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $13k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $12k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $10k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $9k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $9k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $9k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $9k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $8k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $8k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $6k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $5k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $5k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $5k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $5k → 19%CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH: $3k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$427k · 15 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +84% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
8

Total granted

$427k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
0%

Still filing today

60%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentFood & NutritionHealthAnimalsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $74k · revenue +359%
  • CH
    CHRISTIAN HELP INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $72k · revenue +674%
  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA BOTANIC GARDEN INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • DO
    DAUGHTER OF THE KING MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • IT
    IN TOUCH & CONCERNED INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mountain View Humane

The mission of mountain view humane is to end pet overpopulation in southwest virginia and southern west virginia by providing safe, affordable spay/neuter services and vaccine clinics for the community.

Animals
2
The Lord's Pantry of Shinnston

Provide food to needy individuals & families - food is puchased from several sources, donated from serveral sources. costs include renting u-haul trucks to picking up truck loads of food from the mountaineer food bank. we also provide…

3
Mountaineer Food Bank Inc

The organization's mission is to help alleviate hunger in west virginia, educate the general public of the organization's existence and mission, promote awareness of hunger in west virginia, continue to develop and maintain a network for…

Food & Nutrition
4
Manna Meal Inc

Manna meal provides breakfast and lunch 7 days a week, 365 days a year at our location in st. john's episcopal church, charleston, wv. manna meal serves women, men, families, and seniors on a non-discriminary basis.

5
Christian Community Cupboard

Reduce hunger and provide food to families in need.

Religion
6
Wv Helping Hands
Human Services
7
Mountain State Justice Inc

Mountain state justice provides free legal services to low income people in west virginia and assures that low income people have access to the court system.

Crime & Legal
8
Mountaineer Community Health Center

To provide primary medical care service in a rural community.

Health
9
Martinsburg Union Rescue Mission Inc

To provide housing, food and religious counseling for the needy and underprivileged.

Housing & Shelter
10
Community Combined Miinistries Inc

Ccm feeds underprivileged children in wv

Religion
11
Central Wv Center for Pregnancy Care Inc

Preventing termination of pregnancies

12
Tug Valley Recovery Shelter Associationinc

Shelter service for abused women and children in mingo and logan counties in west virginia.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mylan Park Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mountaineer Spay Neuter Assistance Program. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH INC — $73,500 · Human ServicesCHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH INCCHRISTIAN HELP INC — $71,572 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN HELP INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC — $37,600 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INCCOMMUNITY KITCHEN INC — $38,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY KITCHEN INCWV BLACKHILLS FREE METHODIST CAMP — $25,000 · OtherWV BLACKHILLS FREE METHODIST CAMPMON HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER — $21,500 · OtherMON HEALTH MEDICAL CENTERVALLEY FOOD PANTRY — $10,000 · OtherVALLEY FOOD PANTRYSALVATION ARMY — $9,543 · OtherSALVATION ARMYMAKE A WISH OF PENNSYLVANIA AND WV — $8,800 · OtherMAKE A WISH OF PENNSYLVANIA AND WVVALLEY DISTRICT FOOD PANTRY — $8,000 · OtherVALLEY DISTRICT FOOD PANTRYIN TOUCH & CONCERNED INC — $5,000 · Other+6 more — $16,000 · Other+6 moreWEST VIRGINIA BOTANIC GARDEN INC — $60,422 · EnvironmentWEST VIRGINIA B…THE PANTRY PLUS MORE INC — $41,500 · Food & NutritionTHE PANTRY…MILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT INC — $10,000 · HealthMYLAN PARK FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 · EducationDAUGHTER OF THE KING MINISTRIES INC — $5,000 · ReligionMOUNTAINEER SPAY NEUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM — $4,000 · Animals
Human Services$182,672Other$141,843Environment$60,422Food & Nutrition$41,500Health$10,000Education$8,000Religion$5,000Animals$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH INC — $73,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetCHRISTIAN HELP INC — $71,572 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA BOTANIC GARDEN INC — $60,422 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetTHE PANTRY PLUS MORE INC — $41,500 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY KITCHEN INC — $38,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC — $37,600 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT INC — $10,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMYLAN PARK FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNTAINEER SPAY NEUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM — $4,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH INC
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN HELP INC
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA BOTANIC GARDEN INC
  • Who funds THE PANTRY PLUS MORE INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC
  • Who funds MILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT INC
  • Who funds MYLAN PARK FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds DAUGHTER OF THE KING MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds MOUNTAINEER SPAY NEUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Milan Puskar Foundation IncWV22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Milan Puskar Foundation Inc · Truist West Virginia Foundation Inc · Hazel Ruby McQuain Charitable Trust · Your Community Foundation of North Central Wv Inc · Lynch Foundation Inc · John M Brown Family Foundation · George D Hott Foundation · United Way of Monongalia and Preston Counites Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Charles R Nailler Memorial Foundation · Empty Bowls Monongalia · Firstenergy Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Weldon Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph