Skip to content
Hayward Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Hayward Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$173k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$47k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$685kInternational$290kHuman Services$169kFood & Nutrition$95kHealth$71kHousing & Shelter$57kEducation$37kRecreation & Sports$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $127k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Peace Trees Vietnam$47,000
Willapa Bay AiR$40,000
Path with Art$30,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Second Harvest Food Bank$7,500
Camp Holiday Trails$7,500
YMCA of Northwest North Carolina$7,500
Senior Services$7,500
Northwest Children's Foundation$3,000
Mary's Place$2,000
VCCA$2,000
Global Partnerships$2,000
Northwest Harvest$2,000
WIND$1,000
World Without Hate$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%World Food Program: $10k → 14%WIND: $1k → 10%WIND: $1k → 10%Senior Services: $8k → 15%WIND: $1k → 10%Senior Services: $5k → 15%WIND: $1k → 10%Family Services: $5k → 15%Family Services: $5k → 15%Family Services: $3k → 15%Family Services: $3k → 15%Family Services: $3k → 15%American Red Cross: $4k → 9%American Red Cross: $4k → 9%Afghan Health Initiative: $3k → 9%Wellsprings Family Services: $2k → 9%Refugee Women's Alliance: $2k → 9%Refugee Women's Alliance: $1k → 9%Refugee Women's Alliance: $1k → 9%Refugee Women's Alliance: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
OR
IA
VA
MD
NC
DC
HI
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 28 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
20

Total granted

$1.4M
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+44%

Still filing today

71%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalArts & CultureEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PATH WITH ART
    8× · 2017–2025 · $378k · revenue +284%
  • PV
    PEACETREES VIETNAM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $241k · revenue +253%
  • CH
    CAMP HOLIDAY TRAILS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $35k · revenue +189%

Funded once

  • FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +361%
  • TG
    The George Washington University
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +13%
  • UN
    US Navel Institute
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humanities Washington

Humanities washington (hw) opens minds and bridges divides by creating spaces to explore different perspectives. we envision a state where all people seek a deeper understanding of others, themselves, and the human experience, in order to…

Arts & Culture
2
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…

—
3
Earthcorps

To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.

International
4
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
5
Greater Washington Partnership

We identify shared opportunities and core challenges and offer solutions to the region's most critical issues including skills and talent, regional mobility, infrastructure and inclusive economic growth.

Recreation & Sports
6
Wayside House Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.

—
7
Western Healthconnect

Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.

Health
8
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
9
United States Association for Unhcr

USA for UNHCR protects and supports refugees by mobilizing resources, elevating awareness, and driving action through a network of engaged supporters.

International
10
Healthpoint

Healthpoint strengthens communities and improves people's health by delivering quality services, breaking down barriers and providing access to all.

Health
11
Washington Filmworks

To build and enhance the competitiveness of Washington State's film and associated creative industry. We accomplish this by marketing and managing the state's production incentive program, representing the state in national and…

Community Improvement
12
World Coffee Research

World coffee research unites the global coffee industry to drive science-based agricultural solutions to urgently secure a diverse and sustainable supply of quality coffee today and for generations to come. our mission is to grow, protect,…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Central Kitchen Inc; the most unlike its peers is Willapa Bay AiR. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
24/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PATH WITH ART: $378,400 · Arts & CulturePATH WITH ARTWillapa Bay AiR: $285,000 · Arts & CultureWillapa Bay AiR+1 more: $4,500 · Arts & CultureYMCA of Northwest North Carolina: $106,500 · OtherYMCA of Northwest North Caroli…Second Harvest Food Bank: $57,500 · OtherSecond Harvest Food BankNoel House Programs: $50,000 · OtherNoel House ProgramsVirginia Mason Foundation: $40,000 · OtherVirginia Mason FoundationIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL ESODATA STUDY GROUP: $20,000 · OtherWORLD WITHOUT HATE INC: $14,000 · Other+21 more: $93,400 · Other+21 morePEACETREES VIETNAM: $241,400 · InternationalPEACETREES VIETNAMOne Days Wages: $27,500 · InternationalOne Days Wages+3 more: $4,200 · InternationalFAMILY SERVICES INC: $17,500 · Human ServicesSENIOR SERVICES INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $8,000 · Human ServicesRefugee Womens Alliance: $5,000 · Human ServicesWind of God: $4,000 · Human ServicesAFGHAN HEALTH INITIATIVE: $3,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesCAMP HOLIDAY TRAILS: $35,000 · Recreation & SportsSALEM ACADEMY: $10,500 · EducationThe George Washington University: $10,000 · EducationLatino Community Services: $1,500 · EducationGLOBAL PARTNERSHIPS: $9,000 · HealthNAVOS: $7,500 · Health+1 more: $500 · Health
Arts & Culture$667,900Other$401,400International$273,100Human Services$61,500Recreation & Sports$35,000Education$22,000Health$17,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPATH WITH ART: $378,400 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetWillapa Bay AiR: $285,000 over 9y, 51% of budgetPEACETREES VIETNAM: $241,400 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetCAMP HOLIDAY TRAILS: $35,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetOne Days Wages: $27,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES INC: $17,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WITHOUT HATE INC: $14,000 over 7y, 5.8% of budgetSENIOR SERVICES INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNW Childrens Foundation: $12,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSALEM ACADEMY: $10,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL PARTNERSHIPS: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMaris Place: $8,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetNAVOS: $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRefugee Womens Alliance: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA CENTER FOR THE CREATIVE ARTS: $4,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWind of God: $4,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAFGHAN HEALTH INITIATIVE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMercy Corps: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUrban Impact: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLatino Community Services: $1,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA LAND TRUST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER LIFELINE: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PATH WITH ART ↗
  • Who funds Willapa Bay AiR ↗
  • Who funds PEACETREES VIETNAM ↗
  • Who funds CAMP HOLIDAY TRAILS ↗
  • Who funds One Days Wages ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WITHOUT HATE INC ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds NW Childrens Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SALEM ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL PARTNERSHIPS ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Maris Place ↗
  • Who funds NAVOS ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
  • Who funds Refugee Womens Alliance ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA CENTER FOR THE CREATIVE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds Wind of God ↗
  • Who funds PLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES ↗
  • Who funds AFGHAN HEALTH INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
  • Who funds Urban Impact ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationForsyth Memorial Hosp…Reynolds American Fou…The Norcliffe Foundat…Puget Sound Energy Fo…M J Murdock Charitabl…The Winston-Salem Fou…Richard Wood Averill …Flow Foundation IncStrickland Family Fou…Ta John W and Anna H …Moccasin Lake Foundat…
Seattle FoundationWA24.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Forsyth Memorial Hospital Inc · Reynolds American Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Richard Wood Averill Charitable Trust aka Richard Wood Averill Foundation · Flow Foundation Inc · Strickland Family Foundation Cynthia a S Graham · Ta John W and Anna H Hanes Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hayward Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hayward Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hayward Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hayward Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hayward Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home