Skip to content

Missouri · Private foundation

Hayner Foundation Ta

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$100k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
9
Grants FY2025
12
Organizations funded FY2024
17%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$20,000
Organizations funded a year
7 to 12
FY2020 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$1.9M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 17% of the organizations Hayner Foundation Ta funded were first-time grantees, receiving 9% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving9$100k22%
FY202412$115k17%
FY20237$100k14%
FY202211$107k45%
FY202111$95k55%
FY20207$95kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$296kArts & Culture$186kHealth$60kYouth Development$30kRecreation & Sports$25kHuman Services$15k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 20 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 3 recipients with no EIN on record ($25k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Hayner Foundation Ta supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetArts United of Greater Fort Wayne Inc: $125,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetThe Lutheran University Association Inc: $115,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTrine University: $88,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana Institute of Technology Inc: $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSuper Shot Inc: $40,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetJunior Achievement of Northern in Inc: $30,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetQuesta Education Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWorld Baseball Academy Inc: $25,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCancer Services of Allen County Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMartin Luther King School Inc: $14,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetScience Central Inc: $12,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFort Wayne Museum of Art Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Society Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetUnity Performing Arts Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFort Wayne Children's Choir Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetChrist Child Society of Fort Wayne: $5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetThe Honeywell Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeach Our Children Fund Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSpecialty Tutoring Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFort Wayne Philharmonic Orchestra Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 20.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

English-Bonter-Mitchell FdnPA34.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: English-Bonter-Mitchell Fdn · Edward M Wilson Foundation · Surack Family Foundation Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Howard P Arnold Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne Inc · Zollner Foundation · Ardelle and Theresa Glaze Foundation · Dr Louis a and Anne B Schneider Fdn · The James Foundation Inc · Aws Foundation Inc · Nisource Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Hayner Foundation Ta with peer funders

About Hayner Foundation Ta

How much does Hayner Foundation Ta give?
Hayner Foundation Ta reported 9 grants totaling $100,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 7 and 12 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.
What does Hayner Foundation Ta fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (48%), Arts & Culture (30%), Health (10%).
Who are Hayner Foundation Ta's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: Arts United of Greater Fort Wayne Inc ($125k), The Lutheran University Association Inc ($115k), Trine University ($88k).
Does Hayner Foundation Ta fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 17% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Hayner Foundation Ta accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Hayner Foundation Ta?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include English-Bonter-Mitchell Fdn, Edward M Wilson Foundation, Surack Family Foundation Inc.
Where is Hayner Foundation Ta based?
Hayner Foundation Ta is based in MO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hayner Foundation Ta’s filings →

More from the funding graph