Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hawksglen Foundation-Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$208k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Arts & Culture$283kHealth$267kEducation$263kEnvironment$121kHuman Services$54kCivil Rights$51kAnimals$34kRecreation & Sports$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $144k
$8,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPMC HILLMAN CANCER CENTER$25,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$20,000
CARNEGIE MUSEUM-POWDERMILL$18,000
SMITH COLLEGE - FOR THE SMITH FUND$15,000
YWCA$14,000
PHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDEN$12,000
ALL FOUNDATION$10,000
CARNEGIE MUSEUM OF ART$10,000
MAGEE-WOMENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND FDN$10,000
WESA 905$10,000
GARDEN CLUB OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY$8,000
WESTMORELAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$8,000
PITTSBURGH ZOO & PPG AQUARIUM$6,344
Individual grant recipient$5,000
MOUNTAIN PLAYHOUSE$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YWCA WESTMORELAND COUNTY: $14k → 10%YWCA WESTMORELAND COUNTY: $4k → 10%YWCA WESTMORELAND COUNTY: $4k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 27 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
4

Total granted

$1.1M
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+22%

Still filing today

63%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHealthAnimalsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GREENSBURG HEMPFIELD AREA LIBRARY
    6× · 2019–2025 · $158k · revenue +11%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $81k · revenue +43%
  • PC
    PHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $69k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • W
    WESA
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
  • PC
    PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY BROADCASTING CORPORATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +22%
  • WC
    WESTMORELAND COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -26%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

2
The Pennsylvania Horticultural Society

Founded in 1827, the pennsylvania horticultural society (phs) uses horticulture to advance the health and well-being of the greater philadelphia region. (continued in sch o)phs's work focuses on four impact priorities: creating healthy…

Environment
3
Pennsylvania Academic Library Consortium Inc

To support education and research at college, university, and research libraries.

Education
4
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
5
Pittsburgh Council On Higher Education

To provide a means for sharing resources and information among members, engage in joint projects, and offer a common voice on educational matters.

Education
6
World Affairs Council of Pittsburgh

The world affairs council of pittsburgh's mission is to convene and connect people around global issues to build a competitive, thriving, and inclusive pittsburgh.

International
7
Association for Public Art

The association for public art (apa, formerly the fairmount park art association) commissions, preserves, interprets and promotes public art in philadelphia. dedicated to creating a museum without walls that informs, engages and inspires…

Arts & Culture
8
Young Women's Christian Association Greater Pittsburgh

Ywca greater pittsburgh is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all. we envision a community that advances education, opportunity, and equity regardless of gender, race, or…

Human Services
9
Scenic Pittsburgh

To protect, preserve, and promote the scenic resources of southwestern pennsylvania.

Environment
10
Washington Society of Certified Public a

We are a community of cpas and financial professionals cultivating authentic relationships, unique learning experiences, and purposeful advocacy for our future.

11
Wrc Pennsylvania Memorial Home

Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…

Health
12
Pennsylvania Builders Association

Incorporated in 1945, the pennsylvania builders association is a nonprofit professional trade organization representing approximately 4,066 members from across the commonwealth. pba members include contractors, builders, and remodelers,…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Western Pennsylvania Conservancy and the most unlike its peers is The Mountain Playhouse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%5%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr17%20%20–35yr15%40%35–55yr17%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%2%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr17%19%20–35yr15%36%35–55yr17%43%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/20
the rest of the field
9%
7,129/78,142

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
16/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CARNEGIE MUSEUM-POWDERMILL — $98,000 · OtherCARNEGIE MUSEUM-POWDERMILLUPMC HILLMAN CANCER CENTER — $94,000 · OtherUPMC HILLMAN CANCER CENTERSMITH COLLEGE - FOR THE SMITH FUND — $62,000 · OtherSMITH COLLEGE - FOR THE SMITH FUNDREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION — $51,000 · OtherREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATIONWESA 905 — $40,000 · OtherWESA 905CARNEGIE MUSEUM OF ART — $40,000 · OtherCARNEGIE MUSEUM OF ARTMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER — $33,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCERYWCA — $32,000 · OtherYWCA+9 more — $95,000 · Other+9 moreGREENSBURG HEMPFIELD AREA LIBRARY — $158,000 · EducationGREENSBURG HEMPFIELD…WESTOVER SCHOOL INC — $22,300 · EducationWESTOVER SCHOOL INCTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE — $20,500 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF THE …PHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC — $69,000 · EnvironmentPHIPPS CONSE…Garden Club of Allegheny County — $30,500 · EnvironmentGarden Club …WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY — $21,328 · EnvironmentWESTERN PENN…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $81,000 · HealthPLANNED PAR…MAGEE-WOMENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND FOUNDATION — $34,000 · HealthMAGEE-WOMEN…WESTMORELAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $28,000 · Arts & CultureWESTMOREL…THE MOUNTAIN PLAYHOUSE — $23,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MOUNT…WQED MULTIMEDIA — $17,000 · Arts & CultureWQED MULT…WESTMORELAND MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $13,000 · Arts & CultureWESTMOREL…PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY BROADCASTING CORPORATION — $10,000 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURG…ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PITTSBURGH — $32,266 · AnimalsYoung Womens Christian Assoc of Westmoreland Cou — $22,000 · Human Services
Other$545,000Education$200,800Environment$120,828Health$115,000Arts & Culture$91,000Animals$32,266Human Services$22,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGREENSBURG HEMPFIELD AREA LIBRARY — $158,000 over 6y, 5.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $81,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC — $69,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION — $51,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMAGEE-WOMENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND FOUNDATION — $34,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PITTSBURGH — $32,266 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGarden Club of Allegheny County — $30,500 over 6y, 5.6% of budgetWESTMORELAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $28,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetTHE MOUNTAIN PLAYHOUSE — $23,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetWESTOVER SCHOOL INC — $22,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Womens Christian Assoc of Westmoreland Cou — $22,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY — $21,328 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE — $20,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWQED MULTIMEDIA — $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY — $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWESTMORELAND MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $13,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPITTSBURGH COMMUNITY BROADCASTING CORPORATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES — $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTMORELAND COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREENSBURG HEMPFIELD AREA LIBRARY
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds PHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MAGEE-WOMENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds Garden Club of Allegheny County
  • Who funds WESTMORELAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
  • Who funds THE MOUNTAIN PLAYHOUSE
  • Who funds WESTOVER SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds Young Womens Christian Assoc of Westmoreland Cou
  • Who funds WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE
  • Who funds WQED MULTIMEDIA
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds WESTMORELAND MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY BROADCASTING CORPORATION
  • Who funds COMPASSION & CHOICES
  • Who funds WESTMORELAND COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Richard King Mellon FoundationPA19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Richard King Mellon Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Katherine Mabis McKenna Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Robertshaw Charitable Foundation · The Grable Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · Ibm International Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hawksglen Foundation-Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • The Trustees of the Smith College1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph