Skip to content

· Public charity

Hawaii Ag and Culinary Alliance

To support programs that promote culinary arts, agriculture, environmental stewardship, culture and education in hawaii by awarding grants to charitable nonprofits that promote culinary arts education, preserve and protect our environment and agricultural lands, raise awareness about environmental stewardship and sustainability, support…

$319k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$175k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$865kFood & Nutrition$605kPhilanthropy$185kEmployment$157kHealth$155kHuman Services$96kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kEnvironment$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $288,260, the rows itemized in this filing. The $318,565 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $30,305 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $106k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $175k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KOKUA FUND$174,760
LEEWARD CULINARY ARTS$35,000
IMUA FAMILY SERVICES$26,000
UH FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY COLLEGE CULINARY PROGRAMS$25,000
HAWAII AG FOUNDATION$10,000
DC CENTRAL KITCHEN$10,000
JAMES BEARD FOUNDATION$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PAEPAE O HEEIA: $10k → 9%PAEPAE O HEEIA: $8k → 9%PAEPAE O HEEIA: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 9 repeat orgs$542k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +51% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$1.5M
$280k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+51%

Still filing today

67%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $262k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionEnvironmentEducationHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2023 · $647k · revenue +56%
  • HA
    HAWAII AGRICULTURAL FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $376k · revenue +129%
  • IF
    IMUA FAMILY SERVICES
    6× · 2017–2024 · $251k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • KR
    KOKUA RESTAURANT WORKER'S FUNDS
    one grant, 2020 · $147k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII SYSTEM
    one grant, 2022 · $85k
  • FF
    FRONTERA FARMER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Common Ground Collective

It is our mission at common ground collective to transform maui into a bountiful and productive island that benefits both the real-life settings, and hands-on assistance; we will help to elevate distressed and underprivileged members of…

Food & Nutrition
2
Hawaii Culinary Education Foundatio

The hawaii culinary education foundation's mission is to provide hawaiis culinary students and professional access to the best knowledge and exposure to cutting-edge techniques through a variety of programs and educational opportunities…

Education
3
Kaiaulu Initiatives

Kaiaulu initiatives is regreening and rebuilding lahaina one tree and one person at a time through education, training, community networking & sustainability while incorporating hawaiian cultural practices.

Environment
4
Pohaku Pelemaka

Our mission is to protect, perpetuate, and enhance: the intrinsic qualities of the lower puna area, native hawaiian wellbeing, and the transmission of intergenerational knowledge and practices in partnership with county, state, government,…

Human Services
5
Hui Malama I Ke Ala Ulili

To re-establish the systems that sustain our community through educational initiatives and land-based practices that cultivate abundance, regenerate responsibilities, and promote collective health and well being.

Community Improvement
6
E Kupaku Ka Aina - the Hawaii Land Restoration Institute
Environment
7
Ea Ecoversity

Ea ecoversity's mission is to provide culturally-driven learning, training, credentialing, and other long-term societal benefits to ka lahui hawai'i.

Education
8
Kaialahui Foundation

To empower hawaiis farming community to enhance food production and distribution through education, collaboration and advocacy.

Food & Nutrition
9
The Haiku Aina Permaculture Initiative
—
10
Hanalei River Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Ka Ha O Ka Aina
Environment
12
Maui Nui Resiliency Hui

Maui nui resiliency hui (mnrh) is committed to creating a more resilient and equitable future for maui county by focusing on affordable housing solutions that empower our community members. our mission is to collaborate, educate, and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Papahana Kuaola; the most unlike its peers is The James Beard Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KOKUA FUND: $174,760 · OtherKOKUA FUNDKOKUA RESTAURANT WORKER'S FUNDS: $147,431 · OtherKOKUA RESTAURANT WORKER'S FUNDSMAUI COUNTY FARM BUREAU: $89,150 · OtherMAUI COUNTY FARM BUREAUUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII SYSTEM: $85,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII SYSTEMMICHAEL GINOR SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $60,000 · OtherMICHAEL GINOR SCHOLARSHIP FUNDMAUI CULINARY ACADEMY: $40,000 · OtherMAUI CULINARY ACADEMYLEEWARD CULINARY ARTS: $35,000 · OtherUH FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY COLLEGE CULINARY PROGRAMS: $25,000 · Other+6 more: $50,000 · Other+6 moreUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION: $647,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATIONHAWAII AGRICULTURAL FOUNDATION: $375,814 · Food & NutritionHAWAII AGRICULTURAL F…FRONTERA FARMER FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Food & NutritionFRONTERA FARMER FOUND…IMUA FAMILY SERVICES: $251,000 · HealthIMUA FAMILY S…PAPAHANA KUAOLA: $25,000 · EnvironmentHawaii Seafood Council: $15,000 · EnvironmentPAEPAE O HE'EIA: $25,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY: $10,000 · PhilanthropySONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$706,341Education$647,000Food & Nutrition$400,814Health$251,000Environment$40,000Human Services$25,000Philanthropy$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION: $647,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHAWAII AGRICULTURAL FOUNDATION: $375,814 over 7y, 9.7% of budgetIMUA FAMILY SERVICES: $251,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetPAPAHANA KUAOLA: $25,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPAEPAE O HE'EIA: $25,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetFRONTERA FARMER FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetHawaii Seafood Council: $15,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JAMES BEARD FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII AGRICULTURAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IMUA FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PAPAHANA KUAOLA ↗
  • Who funds PAEPAE O HE'EIA ↗
  • Who funds FRONTERA FARMER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Hawaii Seafood Council ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOA AINA O MAKAHA ↗
  • Who funds THE JAMES BEARD FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Trustees of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop Dba Kamehameha SchoolsHI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Trustees of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop Dba Kamehameha Schools · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hawaii Ag and Culinary Alliance funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hawaii Ag and Culinary Alliance. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hawaii Ag and Culinary Alliance?

    Find your warmest path to Hawaii Ag and Culinary Alliance through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hawaii Ag and Culinary Alliance’s filings →

    More from the funding graph