Skip to content

· Public charity

Haven Eileen Kiley Foundation Inc

Help families cope with trauma of childhood illness/injury.

$68k
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$169kHuman Services$56kFood & Nutrition$11kEducation$10k
02FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$125k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NOVANT HEALTH INC$60,000
THE SPOKES GROUP$7,000
BAGS OF HOPE INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%THERAPY DOGS OF LONG ISLAN: $6k → 7%THE SPOKES GROUP: $7k → 7%THERAPY DOGS OF LONG ISLAN: $5k → 7%THE SPOKES GROUP: $7k → 7%The Spokes Group Inc: $7k → 7%THE SPOKES GROUP: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$225k · 6 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +128% since the first grant, against +127% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
2

Total granted

$225k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+128%
+127%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
HealthHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NOVANT HEALTH INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $93k · revenue +132%
  • BS
    BARIUM SPRINGS HOME FOR CHILDREN
    2× · 2018–2019 · $30k · revenue +22%
  • TS
    The Spokes Group Inc
    4× · 2017–2022 · $26k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • EF
    ECMC FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +127%
  • HA
    HEARTS AND HANDS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Presbyterian Hospital

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
2
Nhrmc Home Care

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
3
Novant Medical Group Inc

Our cause we create a healthier future and bring remarkable experiences to life. discover we consistently seek to innovate, courageously transform ourselves and find new ways to add value for our patients, communities and one another.…

—
4
Forsyth Memorial Hospital Inc

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
5
Forsyth Medical Center Foundation

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
6
New Hanover Regional Medical Center Foundation Inc

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
7
Pender Memorial Hospital Incorporated

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
8
Carolina Medicorp Enterprises Inc

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

—
9
Presbyterian Medical Care Corp

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

—
10
Community General Hospital Foundation Inc

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
11
Brunswick Novant Medical Center Foundation

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
12
Rowan Regional Medical Center Foundation Inc

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Novant Health Inc; the most unlike its peers is Therapy Dogs of Long Island. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NOVANT HEALTH INC: $92,500 · HealthNOVANT HEALTH INCPRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 · HealthPRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONEQUUVATION INC: $15,215 · HealthEQUUVATION INCBARIUM SPRINGS HOME FOR CHILDREN: $30,000 · Human ServicesBARIUM SPRINGS HOME FOR CHILDR…The Spokes Group Inc: $26,000 · Human ServicesThe Spokes Group IncTHERAPY DOGS OF LONG ISLAND: $10,847 · Human ServicesTHERAPY DOGS OF LONG ISLANDECMC FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationHEARTS AND HANDS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherBAGS OF HOPE: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Health$157,715Human Services$66,847Education$10,000Other$10,000Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNOVANT HEALTH INC: $92,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBARIUM SPRINGS HOME FOR CHILDREN: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Spokes Group Inc: $26,000 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetEQUUVATION INC: $15,215 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetTHERAPY DOGS OF LONG ISLAND: $10,847 over 2y, 64% of budgetECMC FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAGS OF HOPE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Winston-Salem FoundationNC13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Winston-Salem Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Haven Eileen Kiley Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Haven Eileen Kiley Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient (grants abroad are filed by region only, and grants under $5,000 are not itemized), so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Haven Eileen Kiley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph