Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hauser Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$167k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Education$255kRecreation & Sports$63kCrime & Legal$50kHuman Services$30kHealth$22kPhilanthropy$13kArts & Culture$3k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $108k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$12,080
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HER CAMPAIGN$50,000
TUFTS UNIVERSITY$34,737
DENVER CITY LAX$21,039
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$20,500
SEEDS OF HOPE$20,000
COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION$12,080
DRAKE UNIVERSTIY IOWA DELTA$5,000
KENT DENVER SCHOOL$2,000
DEERFIELD ACADEMY$1,000
ST RITA SCHOOL$207
HEADSTRONG FOUNDATION$104
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%PAN-MASS CHALLENGE: $513 → 7%TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $37k → 8%DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $25k → 14%HER CAMPAIGN: $50k → 9%HEADSTRONG FOUNDATION: $104 → 10%DRAKE UNIVERSTIY IOWA DELTA: $5k → 10%COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION: $12k → 7%BRIGHT FUTURE FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%KENT DENVER SCHOOL: $2k → 8%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $21k → 10%ST RITA SCHOOL: $207 → 12%SEEDS OF HOPE: $20k → 12%TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $35k → 8%DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $5k → 14%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $100k → 10%COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION: $1k → 7%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $514 → 10%DENVER CITY LAX: $22k → 12%TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $25k → 8%DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $1k → 14%DENVER CITY LAX: $21k → 12%DENVER CITY LAX: $20k → 12%MILE HIGH 360: $10k → 12%MILE HIGH 360: $10k → 12%DENVER ART MUSEUM: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Hauser Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 35% of the giving stays in CO; read by stated purpose it is 32% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Hauser Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$232k · 5 repeat orgs$191k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$232k
$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+19%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Trustees of Tufts College
    3× · 2023–2025 · $97k · revenue +16%
  • DC
    DENVER CITY LAX
    3× · 2023–2025 · $63k · revenue +18%
  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $31k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • VU
    VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +19%
  • BF
    BRIGHT FUTURE FOUNDATION FOR EAGLE COUNTY
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +2%
  • DA
    DENVER ART MUSEUMgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +107%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Denver

The university of denver (du) is a higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees - the mission of the university of denver is to promote learning by engaging with students (continued on schedule o)in…

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

5
Fountain Valley School of Colorado

Fountain valley school of colorado provides a transformative curriculum in a supportive environment where students are challenged to think critically, become leaders, and live by our core values: courage, compassion, curiosity,…

Education
6
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
7
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
10
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
11
Dean College

Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…

Education
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Gives Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Her Campaign. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $100,000 · EducationVILLANOVA UNIVERSITYTrustees of Tufts College — $96,750 · EducationTrustees of Tufts CollegeTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY — $31,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY+1 more — $2,000 · EducationDENVER CITY LAX — $63,078 · Recreation & SportsDENVER CITY LAXMILE HIGH 360 — $20,000 · Recreation & SportsMILE HIGH 360CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $21,014 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOS…SEEDS OF HOPE — $20,000 · OtherSEEDS OF HOPEBRIGHT FUTURE FOUNDATION FOR EAGLE COUNTY — $10,000 · OtherBRIGHT FUTURE …DRAKE UNIVERSTIY IOWA DELTA — $5,000 · OtherDRAKE UNIVERST…+2 more — $720 · OtherThe Her Campaign — $50,000 · Crime & LegalThe Her Campa…COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION — $13,120 · PhilanthropyDENVER ART MUSEUM — $3,000 · Arts & CultureHEADSTRONG FOUNDATION — $104 · Health
Education$229,750Recreation & Sports$83,078Other$56,734Crime & Legal$50,000Philanthropy$13,120Arts & Culture$3,000Health$104

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $96,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER CITY LAX — $63,078 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY — $31,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMILE HIGH 360 — $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION — $13,120 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHT FUTURE FOUNDATION FOR EAGLE COUNTY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENT DENVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $513 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hauser Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 13%
  • Trustees of Tufts College13% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph