Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harwell and Betty Coale Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$74k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 73% of HARWELL AND BETTY COALE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$611k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRIST CHURCH CATHEDRAL$34,535
Individual grant recipient$7,500
DEFENDERS FOR CHILDREN$7,500
THE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION$5,000
VICTORY HEALTH PARTNERS$5,000
LIGHT OF THE VILLAGE$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
EMBRACE ALABAMA KIDS$2,000
COMMON GROUND$2,000
MEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES$2,000
Individual grant recipient$500
MOBILE SPCA$500
CENTURION MINISTRIES$500
ALABAMA WILDLIFE FEDERATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%EMBRACE ALABAMA KIDS: $2k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

12%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$10k · 3 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against -51% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
1

Total granted

$10k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
-51%

Still filing today

33%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
HealthAnimalsHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LIGHT OF THE VILLAGE A NONPROF CORPORATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $4k · revenue +17%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3k

Funded once

  • AP
    ALABAMA POLICY INSTITUTE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -51%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

2
Christlife Ministries

Christlife ministries is a non-denominational program dedicated to the discipleship & restoration of ex-offenders, their families, & the imprisoned. mission begins with turning hearts, minds, and souls of parents to their children and…

Crime & Legal
3
African Children's Mission Inc

Reaching out to children in east africa living in destitute circumstances, both physically and with the gospel of jesus christ, to enable them to grow and develop in a secure environment.

Religion
4
Light Ministries Inc

Religious Travel in US and abroad to share the gospel of Jesus Christ. Church planting. Humanitarian aid (orphanages and feeding stations).

Religion
5
Confidential Care Mobile Ministry

To rescue preborn babies from abortion and love their moms into the kingdom.

Civil Rights
6
Liberty Ministries

The ministry exists to serve offenders in prison and ex-offenders in the community by showing god's love, providing practical assistance, and supporting biblical standards of justice.

7
Alabama Healthcare Hall of Fame
Arts & Culture
8
The Center for Medical Progress

The Center For Medical Progress is dedicated to monitoring and reporting on medical ethics and advances through investigative journalism and other educational activities that address contemporary bioethical issues impacting human dignity.…

Health
9
What Matters Ministries and Missions

The organizations exempt purpose is to rescue orphans and widows, feed the poor, build the local church through ministry, crusades and outreaches and to win souls around the world.

Religion
10
Missions Ministry and Media Foundation
11
Outreach Ministries of Alabama Inc

Outreach ministries of alabama, inc. provides residential discipleship programs for young adults with life controlling problems.

Religion
12
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centurion Ministries Inc and the most unlike its peers is The International Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
2/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHRIST CHURCH CATHEDRAL — $34,535 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH CATHEDRALIndividual grant recipient — $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientThe International Foundation — $5,000 · OtherThe International FoundationIndividual grant recipient — $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $3,000 · OtherCOMMON GROUND — $2,000 · Other+3 more — $2,000 · OtherDEFENDERS FOR CHILDREN — $7,500 · HealthDEFENDERS FOR CHILDR…Victory Health Partners Inc — $5,000 · HealthVictory Health Partn…MEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES — $2,000 · HealthMEDICAL OUTREACH MIN…THE LIGHT OF THE VILLAGE A NONPROF CORPORATION — $3,500 · ReligionUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME — $2,000 · Human ServicesALABAMA WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $500 · AnimalsMOBILE SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CR — $500 · AnimalsDREAM COURT INC — $500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$57,035Health$14,500Religion$3,500Human Services$2,000Animals$1,000Recreation & Sports$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDEFENDERS FOR CHILDREN — $7,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetThe International Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVictory Health Partners Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE LIGHT OF THE VILLAGE A NONPROF CORPORATION — $3,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALABAMA POLICY INSTITUTE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTURION MINISTRIES INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALABAMA WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDREAM COURT INC — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMOBILE SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CR — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Daniel Foundation of AlabamaAL19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Gordy-Mead-Britton Foundation · Kiwanis Club of Montgomery Foundation Inc · J L Bedsole Foundation Regions Bank Co-Trustee · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harwell and Betty Coale Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Harwell and Betty Coale Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Harwell and Betty Coale Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph