Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harvey and Ethel Daeumer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$258k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$477kHuman Services$295kHealth$270kReligion$134kCrime & Legal$122kHousing & Shelter$53kScience & Tech$42kFood & Nutrition$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $204k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARKLUND$29,980
ST EDWARD HIGH SCHOOL$25,000
ST CATHERINE OF SIENA SCHOOL$20,093
CASA KANE COUNTY$20,000
IMMANUAEL LUTHERAN CHURCH AND SCHOOL$13,000
IMMANUAEL LUTHERAN CHURCH AND SCHOOL$11,918
FOX VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACTION$11,000
SENIOR SERVICES ASSOCIATES$11,000
FOX VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACTION$11,000
ECKER CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$11,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$10,000
EASTER SEALS OF DUPAGE AND FOX VALLEY$10,000
KANE SENIOR COUNCIL$10,000
GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE$10,000
ROTARY CHARITABLE PROJECTS FOUNDATION OF ELGIN$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $300k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHICAGOLAND AND NORTHWEST INDIANA: $5k → 14%SHARING CONNECTIONS: $6k → 7%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHICAGOLAND AND NORTHWEST INDIANA: $5k → 14%SHARING CONNECTIONS: $6k → 7%SHARING CONNECTIONS: $5k → 7%SHARING CONNECTIONS: $5k → 7%SHARING CONNECTIONS: $5k → 7%SHARING CONNECTIONS: $5k → 7%SHARING CONNECTIONS: $3k → 7%YWCA ELGIN: $20k → 14%YWCA ELGIN: $15k → 14%YWCA ELGIN: $14k → 14%YWCA ELGIN: $10k → 14%FOX VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACTION: $11k → 8%YWCA ELGIN: $6k → 14%FOX VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACTION: $11k → 8%FOX VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACTION: $10k → 8%YWCA ELGIN: $5k → 14%FOX VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACTION: $10k → 8%FOX VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACTION: $10k → 8%FOX VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACTION: $10k → 8%FOX VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACTION: $10k → 8%YWCA ELGIN: $2k → 14%FOX VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACTION: $10k → 8%FOX VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACTION: $7k → 8%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $9k → 14%FOX VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACTION: $7k → 8%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $9k → 14%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $6k → 14%FOX VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACTION: $7k → 8%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $6k → 14%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $6k → 14%FOX VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACTION: $7k → 8%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $5k → 14%MARKLUND: $30k → 8%ASSOCIATION FOR INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Harvey and Ethel Daeumer Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Harvey and Ethel Daeumer Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 29 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +73% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
5

Total granted

$1.4M
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+19%

Still filing today

52%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterEducationCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    Riverwoods Christian Center dba Fox Valley Christian Action
    6× · 2020–2025 · $107k · revenue +152%
  • CK
    CASA KANE COUNTY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $92k · revenue +7%
  • TY
    The Young Womens Christian Association Elgin Illinois
    6× · 2020–2025 · $72k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • AF
    ASSOCIATION FOR INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +71%
  • RF
    ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ELGIN
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • FV
    FOX VALLEY HANDS OF HOPE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Link Inc

Child Link provides foster care, family counseling, and therapy services to Chicago area adolescents who are at risk of homelessness. Child Link also refers adolescents to other agencies that are able to provide additional resources and…

Human Services
2
Illinois Institute for Children

Providing Social Services to Families including Child Care

Human Services
3
Grand Prairie Services Llc

The provision of holistic emotional and behavioral health services for individuals, families and communities with an emphasis on recovery and optimal functioning.

Human Services
4
Center for Family Services

Administering an array of critical, intensive therapeutic interventions and/or facilitation services to emotionally and behaviorally disturbed clients for whom DCFS is legally responsible in order to stabilize their traditional or home of…

Human Services
5
Lakeside Community Committee

To enhance the quality of life for children and families by inspiring hope and empowerment and growth within all whom we serve.

Human Services
6
Chicago Children's Advocacy Center

The chicago children's advocacy center unites public, private, and community partners to ensure the safety, health, and well-being of abused children.

Crime & Legal
7
Childrens Advocacy Center of East Central Illinois

To assist children who have been victims of abuse

Crime & Legal
8
Oak Leyden Developmental Services Inc

To help people with developmental disabilities meet life's challenges and reach their highest potential.

—
9
Brian's House Inc

Brian's House specializes in the care and treatment of people with disabilities. Brian's House provides a broad range of human services to people with special needs and challenges. The primary goal is to maximize each individual's…

Human Services
10
Depaul Community Services Inc

To provide residential and rehabilitation services to clients with mental illnesses

Health
11
Christian Social Services of Illinois

Caritas family solutions strengthens the social and emotional well-being of individuals and families in order to create healthy relationships, loving homes and strong communities.

Human Services
12
Shelter Inc

Shelter's mission is to end the cycle of child abuse by providing a comprehensive network of support to children, their families, and our community to create safe, health, and nurturing homes.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Crisis Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dundee Township Rotary Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
20/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IMMANUAEL LUTHERAN CHURCH AND SCHOOL: $149,629 · OtherIMMANUAEL LUTHERAN CHURCH AND SCHOOLST EDWARD HIGH SCHOOL: $141,133 · OtherST EDWARD HIGH SCHOOLMARKLUND WASMOND CENTER: $135,872 · OtherMARKLUND WASMOND CENTERST CATHERINE OF SIENA CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $83,956 · OtherST CATHERINE OF SIENA CATHOLIC SCHOOLECKER CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC: $62,000 · OtherECKER CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INCSENIOR SERVICES ASSOCIATES INC: $47,000 · OtherSENIOR SERVICES ASSOCIATES INCROTARY CHARITABLE PROJECTS FOUNDATION OF ELGIN ILLINOIS 60123: $40,000 · OtherEASTER SEALS OF DUPAGE AND FOX VALLEY: $40,000 · OtherADMINISTER JUSTICE: $30,000 · Other+13 more: $143,949 · Other+13 moreRiverwoods Christian Center dba Fox Valley Christian Action: $107,000 · Human ServicesRiverwoods Christian Cent…The Young Womens Christian Association Elgin Illinois: $72,107 · Human ServicesThe Young Womens Christia…THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $41,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FO…SHARING CONNECTIONS INC: $34,500 · Human ServicesSHARING CONNECTIONS INCMARKLUND CHILDRENS HOME: $29,980 · Human ServicesMARKLUND CHILDRENS HOMECOMMUNITY CRISIS CENTER INC: $25,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY CRISIS CENTER I…+2 more: $15,000 · Human ServicesCASA KANE COUNTY: $92,000 · Civil RightsST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $52,057 · HealthGIGI'S PLAYHOUSE INC: $20,000 · HealthFox Valley Pregnancy Center: $5,000 · HealthPADS OF ELGIN INC: $37,000 · Housing & ShelterTransitional Living Services Inc: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterDUNDEE TOWNSHIP ROTARY FOUNDATION: $32,000 · Education+1 more: $685 · EducationBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE DUNDEE TOWNSHIP: $9,250 · Youth Development
Other$873,539Human Services$325,087Civil Rights$92,000Health$77,057Housing & Shelter$39,000Education$32,685Youth Development$9,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRiverwoods Christian Center dba Fox Valley Christian Action: $107,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetCASA KANE COUNTY: $92,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetThe Young Womens Christian Association Elgin Illinois: $72,107 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetECKER CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC: $62,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $52,057 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR SERVICES ASSOCIATES INC: $47,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $41,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPADS OF ELGIN INC: $37,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetSHARING CONNECTIONS INC: $34,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDUNDEE TOWNSHIP ROTARY FOUNDATION: $32,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetMARKLUND CHILDRENS HOME: $29,980 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY CRISIS CENTER INC: $25,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGIGI'S PLAYHOUSE INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTH CENTRAL ILLINOIS INC: $10,350 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHICAGOLAND & NW INDIANA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE DUNDEE TOWNSHIP: $9,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFox Valley Pregnancy Center: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOX VALLEY FOOD FOR HEALTH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFOX VALLEY HANDS OF HOPE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetANDERSON ANIMAL SHELTER: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LITERACY CONNECTION: $685 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Riverwoods Christian Center dba Fox Valley Christian Action ↗
  • Who funds CASA KANE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds The Young Womens Christian Association Elgin Illinois ↗
  • Who funds ECKER CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR SERVICES ASSOCIATES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CHARITABLE PROJECTS FOUNDATION OF ELGIN ILLINOIS 60123 ↗
  • Who funds PADS OF ELGIN INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARING CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds DUNDEE TOWNSHIP ROTARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARKLUND CHILDRENS HOME ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTH CENTRAL ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHICAGOLAND & NW INDIANA ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE DUNDEE TOWNSHIP ↗
  • Who funds Fox Valley Pregnancy Center ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds FOX VALLEY FOOD FOR HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds FOX VALLEY HANDS OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds ANDERSON ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds Transitional Living Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE LITERACY CONNECTION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Efs FoundationAZ32.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Efs Foundation · Community Foundation of the Fox River Valley · The Bersted Foundation · Grand Victoria Foundation · United Way of Elgin Inc · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Seigle Foundation · Northern Illinois Food Bank · Hoffer Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harvey and Ethel Daeumer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harvey and Ethel Daeumer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harvey and Ethel Daeumer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph