Skip to content
Harvest Against Hunger at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Harvest Against Hunger

To help feed hungry people with surplus nutritious produce.

$5.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$2.0M
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 46 grants below total $608,313, the rows itemized in this filing. The $5,056,771 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,448,458 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k36 grants · $538k
$13,035
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIVING WELL KENT$30,000
SNOQUALMIE VALLEY FARMERS COOPERATIVE$22,500
PACIFIC ISLANDER HEALTH BOARD$22,500
AASH FARMS$22,500
MAKING A DIFFERENCE FOUNDATION$19,400
CLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK$18,303
COASTAL HARVEST$17,864
EAGLE'S NEST COMMUNITY KITCHEN$16,472
NOURISH PIERCE COUNTY$16,108
ARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$15,485
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY$15,230
NEW HUNGER COALITION$15,230
COUNCIL ON AGING AND HUMAN SERVICES$15,010
FEEDING FEASIBLE FEASTS$14,791
BLUE MOUNTAIN ACTION COUNCIL$14,643
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $604k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $17k → 9%OLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $14k → 11%EATONVILLE FAMILY AGENCY: $11k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES FOOD FOR ALL: $22k → 12%RURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION: $22k → 13%OIC YAKIMA: $25k → 17%OKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $16k → 17%COUNCIL ON AGING AND HUMAN SERVICES: $23k → 20%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER WHITMAN: $18k → 20%ARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $15k → 9%OLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $13k → 11%EATONVILLE FAMILY AGENCY: $9k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES FOOD FOR ALL: $14k → 12%OIC OF WASHINGTON: $13k → 17%OKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $12k → 17%COASTAL HARVEST: $18k → 18%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $11k → 20%OLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $8k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $25k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES FOOD FOR ALL: $9k → 12%OIC OF WASHINGTON: $13k → 17%OKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $12k → 17%COUNCIL ON AGING AND HUMAN SERVICES: $15k → 20%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $7k → 20%SKAGIT COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $11k → 11%OIC OF WASHINGTON: $10k → 17%OKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $7k → 17%COUNCIL ON AGING AND HUMAN SERVICES: $9k → 20%CHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $31k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $10k → 11%RURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION: $9k → 13%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $12k → 20%CHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $9k → 9%LOPEZ ISLAND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $7k → 10%COMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $10k → 11%LOPEZ ISLAND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $7k → 10%COMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $5k → 11%HOPELINK: $20k → 9%HOPELINK: $14k → 9%HOPELINK: $10k → 9%HOPELINK: $9k → 9%EATONVILLE FAMILY AGENCY: $11k → 9%EAGLE'S NEST COMMUNITY KITCHEN: $16k → 9%EAGLE'S NEST COMMUNITY KITCHEN: $16k → 9%EAGLE'S NEST COMMUNITY KITCHEN: $9k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 46 repeat orgs$180k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against -8% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 37 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
3

Total granted

$1.9M
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
-8%

Still filing today

87%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $157k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementInternationalArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BM
    BLUE MOUNTAIN ACTION COUNCIL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $82k · revenue +11%
  • EF
    EMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $79k · revenue +34%
  • CC
    CLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK
    8× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • GR
    GOOD RAIN FARM
    one grant, 2022 · $9k
  • YR
    Yakima Rotary Food Bank
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue -8%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    one grant, 2024 · $7k · revenue -14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
2
Snoqualmie Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.

Food & Nutrition
3
Feeding Washington

Create a strong and effective statewide infrastructure that efficiently leverages resources to expand capacity in Washington State's Feeding America network.

Food & Nutrition
4
Lake Chelan Food Bank

The mission of Lake Chelan Food Bank is to treat each person we serve with dignity and respect and to provide balanced and varied options that give each person the liberty to meet the specific food needs for themsevles and/or their family.

Food & Nutrition
5
West Seattle Food Bank

West Seattle Food Bank strengthens the community through the power of neighbors helping neighbors, working to ensure all in our community have access to the essential necessities of living.

Food & Nutrition
6
Columbia Pacific Food Bank

Columbia pacific food bank is the regional food distribution center for columbia county, oregon and local food pantry for the community of saint helens.

Food & Nutrition
7
Nooksack Valley Food Bank Association

Our mission is to provide a variety of food products to families and individuals who are in need. We are open one day a week.

Food & Nutrition
8
Renewal Food Bank

Renewal Food Bank provides food to needy and economically vulnerable individuals who live in Bellevue, Washington and surrounding communities

Human Services
9
Food Bank of Eastern Michigan

The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…

Food & Nutrition
10
Lake County Food Share Inc

Lake county food share inc is an organization whose purpose is to coordinate and to meet both supplemental and emergency food needs of families and individuals in lake county, oregon.

Food & Nutrition
11
Washington Food Coalition

To strengthen hunger relief providers in WA State.

—
12
Snohomish Community Food Bank

To provide food and services in a caring and dignified manner to neighbors in need

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Second Harvest Inland Northwest; the most unlike its peers is Praisealujah Discipleship. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
65/65
Grantees still filing
47/65
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Nourish Pierce County: $76,206 · OtherNourish Pierce CountyCLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK: $74,752 · OtherCLARK COUNTY FOOD BANKWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $56,041 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITYCOASTAL HARVEST: $51,254 · OtherCOASTAL HARVESTKITSAP CD: $46,217 · OtherKITSAP CDFARMSTAND LOCAL FOODS: $45,130 · OtherFARMSTAND LOCAL FOODSFERNDALE FOOD BANK: $44,798 · OtherFERNDALE FOOD BANKUPPER VALLEY MEND: $44,606 · OtherUPPER VALLEY MENDLEWIS COUNTY FOOD BANK COALITION: $30,276 · OtherFARESTART: $25,632 · Other+16 more: $264,134 · Other+16 moreHOPELINK: $66,277 · Human ServicesHOPELINKOPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF WASHINGTON: $61,523 · Human ServicesOPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CEN…COMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $61,494 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTYCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SPOKANE: $57,959 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SPOKANECommunity Action Center: $47,537 · Human ServicesCommunity Action CenterCOUNCIL ON AGING & HUMAN SERVICES: $47,464 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL ON AGING & HUMAN SERVICESOKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC: $46,521 · Human ServicesOKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION CO…EAGLES NEST COMMUNITY KITCHEN: $41,478 · Human ServicesEAGLES NEST COMMUNITY KITCHENCHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COU: $39,669 · Human ServicesCHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COUOLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS: $34,613 · Human ServicesOLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMSARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $32,690 · Human ServicesEatonville Area Council DBA Eatonville Family Agency: $31,750 · Human ServicesRURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION: $30,954 · Human Services+2 more: $32,082 · Human ServicesBLUE MOUNTAIN ACTION COUNCIL: $82,022 · Food & NutritionBLUE MOUNTAIN ACTION COUN…EMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY: $79,198 · Food & NutritionEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF…THURSTON COUNTY FOOD BANK: $68,262 · Food & NutritionTHURSTON COUNTY FOOD BANKFEEDING FEASIBLE FEASTS: $43,790 · Food & NutritionFEEDING FEASIBLE FEASTSGoodRoots Northwest: $35,072 · Food & NutritionGoodRoots NorthwestPROVIDENCE NORTHEAST WASHINGTON HUNGER COALITION: $30,460 · Food & NutritionPROVIDENCE NORTHEAST WASH…LIVING WELL KENT COLLABORATIVE: $30,000 · Food & NutritionLIVING WELL KENT COLLABOR…DARRINGTON FOOD BANK: $25,438 · Food & NutritionDARRINGTON FOOD BANKHunger Intervention Program: $23,512 · Food & NutritionOTHELLO FOOD BANK: $23,436 · Food & NutritionSOUTH WHIDBEY GOOD CHEER: $22,076 · Food & NutritionSOUTHWEST WASHINGTON LULAC FOUNDATION LATINOS UNIDOS Y FLORECIENDO: $58,341 · Arts & CultureMAKING A DIFFERENCE FOUNDATION: $50,640 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $6,966 · InternationalSeattle Good Business Network DBA Good Business Network of Washington: $35,341 · Community ImprovementFoundation for Sustainable Community: $9,401 · Community ImprovementFISH: $27,643 · Philanthropy
Other$759,046Human Services$632,011Food & Nutrition$463,266Arts & Culture$58,341International$57,606Community Improvement$44,742Philanthropy$27,643

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLUE MOUNTAIN ACTION COUNCIL: $82,022 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY: $79,198 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNourish Pierce County: $76,206 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK: $74,752 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHURSTON COUNTY FOOD BANK: $68,262 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHOPELINK: $66,277 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF WASHINGTON: $61,523 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $61,494 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHWEST WASHINGTON LULAC FOUNDATION LATINOS UNIDOS Y FLORECIENDO: $58,341 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SPOKANE: $57,959 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMAKING A DIFFERENCE FOUNDATION: $50,640 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Action Center: $47,537 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOUNCIL ON AGING & HUMAN SERVICES: $47,464 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetOKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC: $46,521 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFERNDALE FOOD BANK: $44,798 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetUPPER VALLEY MEND: $44,606 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFEEDING FEASIBLE FEASTS: $43,790 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetEAGLES NEST COMMUNITY KITCHEN: $41,478 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetCHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COU: $39,669 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSeattle Good Business Network DBA Good Business Network of Washington: $35,341 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetGoodRoots Northwest: $35,072 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS: $34,613 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $32,690 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetEatonville Area Council DBA Eatonville Family Agency: $31,750 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetRURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION: $30,954 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROVIDENCE NORTHEAST WASHINGTON HUNGER COALITION: $30,460 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetLEWIS COUNTY FOOD BANK COALITION: $30,276 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetFISH: $27,643 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFARESTART: $25,632 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDARRINGTON FOOD BANK: $25,438 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetHELPING HANDS FOOD BANK: $23,876 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHunger Intervention Program: $23,512 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetOTHELLO FOOD BANK: $23,436 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetSOUTH WHIDBEY GOOD CHEER: $22,076 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetORCAS ISLAND FOOD BANK: $21,984 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetRAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK: $20,911 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOASTAL HARVEST: $17,864 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLIFELONG HEALTH FOR ALL: $14,526 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOPEZ ISLAND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $14,218 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWHITE CENTER EMERGENCY FOOD ASSOCIATION WHITE CENTER FOOD BANK: $14,099 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRIDAY HARBOR FOOD BANK: $13,925 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetFoundation for Sustainable Community: $9,401 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetYakima Rotary Food Bank: $6,983 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $6,966 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Northwest Harvest EmmFood LifelinePuget Sound Energy Fo…Seattle FoundationThe Albertsons Compan…Second Harvest Inland…The Kroger Co Zero Hu…United Way of King Co…Washington Federal Fo…The Norcliffe Foundat…Credit Unions in the …Dutch Bros Foundation
Northwest Harvest EmmWA78.6× affinity37 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Northwest Harvest Emm · Food Lifeline · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Seattle Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Second Harvest Inland Northwest · The Kroger Co Zero Hunger Zero Waste Foundation · United Way of King County · Washington Federal Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Credit Unions in the State of Washington · Dutch Bros Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harvest Against Hunger funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harvest Against Hunger. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    31report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harvest Against Hunger’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home