Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harter Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$104k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$196kPhilanthropy$54kEnvironment$49kEducation$43kInternational$38kCivil Rights$33kPublic Benefit$15kCommunity Improvement$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $71k
$2,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$517k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
First Congl Church Guilford$36,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Boston Womens Fund$10,000
Corporate Accountability Intl$6,000
Neighbor to Neighor Education Fund$4,000
Yale University$3,000
Shared Interest$3,000
First Church in Cambridge UCC$2,500
CISPES Education Fund$2,000
South Africa Partners$2,000
Sojourners$2,000
Benincasa Community Inc$2,000
Conservation Law Foundation$2,000
Society for the Future of Hifger Education$2,000
Slingshot$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Earth Action -- PHF: $5k → 11%South Africa Partners: $2k → 16%Shared Interest: $5k → 17%CISPES Education Fund: $3k → 14%First Cong'l Church of Guilford: $35k → 12%LeMoyne-Owen College: $4k → 17%Earth Action: $5k → 10%United Church of Christ: $15k → 17%First Congl Church Guilford: $36k → 7%Chicago Theologlical Seminary: $25k → 14%Earth Action: $25k → 9%Central Atl Conference UCC: $3k → 11%Society for the Future of Hifger Education: $2k → 18%Boston Womens Fund: $10k → 8%Neighbor to Neighor Education Fund: $4k → 11%South Africa Partners: $2k → 16%Shared Interest: $5k → 17%CISPES Education Fund: $2k → 14%First CongregationalChurch Guilford: $32k → 12%LeMoyne-Owen College: $4k → 17%Global Ministries: $2k → 17%Chicago Theological Seminary: $7k → 14%Society for Values in Higher Educa: $2k → 18%First Church in Cambridge UCC: $3k → 8%Neighbor to Neighbor Education Fund: $4k → 11%South Africa Partners: $2k → 16%Shared Interest: $3k → 17%CISPES Education Fund: $2k → 14%1st Congregational Guilford CT: $28k → 12%LeMoyne Owen College: $4k → 17%Shared Interest: $5k → 17%First Congregational Church of Guil: $24k → 12%Benincasa Community Inc: $5k → 12%Grassroots Intl: $5k → 16%Boston Women's Fund: $10k → 16%Boston Womens Fund: $10k → 16%Boston Women's Fund: $10k → 16%Boston Women's Fund: $10k → 16%Corporate Accountability Intl: $6k → 16%Corporate Accountability Internatio: $15k → 16%Corporate Accountability Int'l: $12k → 16%Corporate Accountability: $10k → 16%Corporate Accountability Intl: $10k → 16%Congregational Library Archives: $5k → 16%Toxics Action Center: $5k → 16%Congregational Library and Archives: $5k → 16%Neighbor to Neighbor Edu Fund: $4k → 16%Neighbor to Neighbor Education Fund: $4k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
NY
MA
OH
CT
CA
CO
KY
MD
TN
DC
MS
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$233k · 20 repeat orgs$271k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against -14% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
20

Total granted

$233k
$219k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
-14%

Still filing today

55%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEnvironmentPhilanthropyEducationHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BW
    BOSTON WOMEN'S FUND INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue ×14
  • ID
    Infact DBA Corporate Accountability
    4× · 2020–2024 · $38k · revenue +10%
  • LC
    LeMoyne-Owen College
    3× · 2020–2022 · $12k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • FC
    First Cong'l Church of Guilford
    one grant, 2023 · $35k
  • FC
    First CongregationalChurch Guilford
    one grant, 2022 · $32k
  • 1C
    1st Congregational Guilford CT
    one grant, 2021 · $28k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
Justice Funders

Serve as a partner, educator, and guide for philanthropy in reimagining practices that advance a thriving and just world.

—
3
Amazon Watch Inc

To protect the rainforest and advance the rights of Indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with Indigenous communities in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability, and the preservation of the Amazon Basin's…

Environment
4
Sustainable Harvest International

Working together to create a just and sustainable world through transformative farmer training that nourishes communities and the Earth.

Environment
5
International Rivers Network

International Rivers protects rivers and defends the rights of communities that depend on them.

Environment
6
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
7
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
8
Partnership for Policy Integrity

Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.

Environment
9
Grist Magazine Inc

Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.

Environment
10
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
11
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
12
New Roots Institute

New Roots Institute is a nonprofit empowering the next generation with knowledge and training to end factory farming.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grassroots International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Conservation Law Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
10/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

First Congl Church Guilford: $36,000 · OtherFirst Congl Church GuilfordFirst Cong'l Church of Guilford: $35,000 · OtherFirst Cong'l Church of GuilfordFirst CongregationalChurch Guilford: $32,000 · OtherFirst CongregationalChurch GuilfordIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient1st Congregational Guilford CT: $28,000 · Other1st Congregational Guilford CTIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFirst Congregational Church of Guil: $24,000 · OtherFirst Congregational Church of GuilCorporate Accountability Internatio: $15,000 · OtherUnited Church of Christ: $15,000 · Other+25 more: $99,743 · Other+25 moreSHARED INTEREST INC: $18,000 · InternationalSHARED INTE…SOUTH AFRICA PARTNERS INC: $10,000 · InternationalSOUTH AFRIC…CISPES EDUCATION FUND: $9,400 · InternationalCISPES EDUC…GRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 · InternationalGRASSROOTS …A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $5,000 · InternationalA JEWISH VO…Peace Development Fund: $4,000 · InternationalPeace Devel…+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalBOSTON WOMEN'S FUND INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyBOSTON WOME…Infact DBA Corporate Accountability: $38,000 · EnvironmentInfact DBA…TOXICS ACTION CENTER INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentTOXICS ACT…THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $4,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUSTE…CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentLeMoyne-Owen College: $12,000 · EducationBACK BAY MISSION: $3,000 · Housing & ShelterBENINCASA COMMUNITY INC: $2,000 · Community Improvement
Other$339,743International$52,400Philanthropy$50,000Environment$49,000Education$12,000Housing & Shelter$3,000Community Improvement$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOSTON WOMEN'S FUND INC: $50,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetInfact DBA Corporate Accountability: $38,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSHARED INTEREST INC: $18,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetLeMoyne-Owen College: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSojourners Inc: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH AFRICA PARTNERS INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCISPES EDUCATION FUND: $9,400 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOXICS ACTION CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS IN ACTION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPeace Development Fund: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHAYMARKET PEOPLE'S FUND INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBACK BAY MISSION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBENINCASA COMMUNITY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR VALUES IN HIGHER EDUCATION: $2,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCITY MISSION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOSTON WOMEN'S FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Infact DBA Corporate Accountability ↗
  • Who funds SHARED INTEREST INC ↗
  • Who funds LeMoyne-Owen College ↗
  • Who funds Sojourners Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH AFRICA PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CISPES EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds GRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds TOXICS ACTION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Peace Development Fund ↗
  • Who funds HAYMARKET PEOPLE'S FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ↗
  • Who funds BACK BAY MISSION ↗
  • Who funds BENINCASA COMMUNITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tides FoundationCA13.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tides Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harter Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harter Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Community Partners in Action Inc: 90% of income from government
  • South Africa Partners Inc: 42% of income from government
  • Benincasa Community Inc: 4% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Infact Dba Corporate Accountability: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Harter Family Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Harter Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harter Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph