Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harry Arnote Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Food & Nutrition$25kYouth Development$16kHuman Services$15kEducation$14kArts & Culture$7kHealth$7kHousing & Shelter$7kReligion$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,325
Median grant
1
States reached
$457k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUNG LIFE$2,500
IN AS MUCH MINISTRY$2,100
LIBERTY PARKS & RECREATION FOUNDATION$2,000
LEVEL UP KIDS$2,000
MEALS ON WHEELS INC$1,800
SECOND FRIENDS PRESCHOOL$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,325
GILDA'S CLUB KANSAS CITY$1,200
SWADDLING CLOTHES KANSAS CITY$1,100
NORTHLAND EARLY EDUCATION CENTER$1,000
SECOND BAPTIST CHURCH$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
LIBERTY CHRISTMAS TREE COMMISION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$875
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%IN AS MUCH MINISTRY: $2k → 8%IN AS MUCH MINISTRY: $2k → 8%IN AS MUCH MINISTRY: $2k → 8%IN AS MUCH MINISTRY: $2k → 8%IN AS MUCH MINISTRY: $2k → 8%IN AS MUCH MINISTRY: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$119k · 21 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
4

Total granted

$119k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+37%

Still filing today

62%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +62%
  • IA
    IN AS MUCH MINISTRY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +48%
  • TR
    THE RABBIT HOLE KC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $7k · revenue +208%

Funded once

  • NA
    NORTHLAND ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +37%
  • FP
    FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • TC
    The Christmas Store at 2BC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Food Center

To provide food and household items to those in need in johnson county, missouri

Food & Nutrition
2
Humankind Ministries Wichita Inc

Humankind ministries provides street outreach, shelter, affordable housing, supportive services, and basic needs to those experiencing homelessness or poverty in sedgwick county. recognizing the inherent value of each person, we serve the…

Religion
3
Hot Lunch Service

Exists solely to support Kansas City area residents in need. Everyday of the year, faith-based volunteer groups and organizations provide and serve meals to those in need. Donors and volunteers are the heart and soul of St. Mary's Food…

4
Hope Faith Ministries Inc

Hope Faith Ministries Inc. works to alleviate homelessness and poverty in the Kansas City area by providing basic necessities and assistance while also providing critical programs to help empower individ

Human Services
5
Community Children's Center Inc

Provides education and medical assistance to underpriveleged children ages 3-5 in the lawrence kansas area

Education
6
North Liberty Community Pantry

North liberty community pantry engages the community in feeding, clothing, and connecting neighbors to resources and services.

Food & Nutrition
7
Kansas Foodbank Warehouse Inc

To feed the hungry by soliciting and receiving food and other goods from local, regional and national food companies and other enterprises

Food & Nutrition
8
Habitat for Humanity of Nodaway County Inc

Provide affordable housing to low-income families

Housing & Shelter
9
Meals On Wheels of Mcpherson Ks Inc

Serving meals and delivering them to the elderly and disabled

Food & Nutrition
10
Liberty Community Center

Community services to families in need

Human Services
11
Wilkinsburg Community Ministry

Wilkinsburg community ministry, a non-profit supported by area residents and congregations, responds to persistent needs of all faiths, addressing the human service crises in our community.

12
Youth Volunteer Corps

We engage youth in team-based service experiences that build life and work skills while inspiring a lifetime ethic of service.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed Northland Kids Inc and the most unlike its peers is Northland Animal Welfare Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $7,915 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS INCSECOND FRIENDS PRESCHOOL — $7,100 · OtherSECOND FRIENDS PRESCHOOLGRACE BAPTIST DAY CARE — $6,662 · OtherGRACE BAPTIST DAY CAREIndividual grant recipient — $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientClay County Clothes Closet — $5,634 · OtherClay County Clothes ClosetLIBERTY PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION — $5,500 · OtherLIBERTY PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $5,359 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $4,925 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNorthland Early Education Cent — $4,251 · OtherNorthland Early Education CentSECOND BAPTIST CHURCH — $4,000 · OtherLIBERTY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,950 · Other+9 more — $14,922 · Other+9 moreYOUNG LIFE — $15,803 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFEIN AS MUCH MINISTRY — $9,950 · Human ServicesLEVELUP KIDS INC — $6,000 · HealthGILDA'S CLUB KANSAS CITY — $1,200 · HealthTHE RABBIT HOLE KC — $7,001 · Arts & CultureHILLCREST MINISTRIES INC — $4,541 · ReligionFEED NORTHLAND KIDS INC — $4,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$78,218Youth Development$15,803Human Services$9,950Health$7,200Arts & Culture$7,001Religion$4,541Food & Nutrition$4,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYOUNG LIFE — $15,803 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetIN AS MUCH MINISTRY — $9,950 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC — $7,915 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetTHE RABBIT HOLE KC — $7,001 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLEVELUP KIDS INC — $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetClay County Clothes Closet — $5,634 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetLIBERTY PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION — $5,500 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetHILLCREST MINISTRIES INC — $4,541 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFEED NORTHLAND KIDS INC — $4,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNorthland Early Education Cent — $4,251 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLIBERTY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLIBERTY COMMUNITY CHRISTMAS TREE — $2,522 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetRebuilding Together Kansas City Inc — $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVOCATIONAL SERVICES INC — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHLAND ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds IN AS MUCH MINISTRY
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC
  • Who funds THE RABBIT HOLE KC
  • Who funds LEVELUP KIDS INC
  • Who funds Clay County Clothes Closet
  • Who funds LIBERTY PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HILLCREST MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds FEED NORTHLAND KIDS INC
  • Who funds Northland Early Education Cent
  • Who funds LIBERTY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LIBERTY COMMUNITY CHRISTMAS TREE
  • Who funds Rebuilding Together Kansas City Inc
  • Who funds VOCATIONAL SERVICES INC
  • Who funds NORTHLAND ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds GILDA'S CLUB KANSAS CITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO30.2× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · The Daniel G and Wanda K O'Dell Family Foundation · Liberty Hospital Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Harvest Ball Society · Edward & Kathryn Mader Foundation · R a Long Foundation 600 Plaza West Bldg · Buttonwood Foundation Charitable Tr · Harley-Davidson Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harry Arnote Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph