Skip to content
Harry & Rosemary King Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Harry & Rosemary King Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$396k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$396k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Philanthropy$396kEducation$44kHuman Services$32kCrime & Legal$11kEnvironment$11kInternational$9kHealth$4k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$395,740
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EVERENCE DONOR ADVISED FUND$395,740
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%LGBTQ CENTER OF DURHAM: $13k → 11%NEW BRIDGES IMMIGRANT RESOURCE CENT: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humanitarian Outreach for Migrant Emotional Health

Our purpose is to provide mental health assessment for immigrants in need by documenting their trauma histories, emotional and cognitive impact, fear of return, and other mental health factors important to their legal petitions. We also…

Human Services
2
In His Steps Pathways of Peace

Religious Humanitarian

Religion
3
Carribean Equality Project Inc

The Caribbean Equality Project is an NYC-based community organization that empowers, advocates for, and represents Afro and Indo-Caribbean LGBTQ+ immigrants in New York City.

Human Services
4
Inreach

InReach fka AsylumConnect is a trans-led tech nonprofit dedicated to building the world's first open source verified LGBTQ+ resource platform. InReach's free platform connects LGBTQ+ people facing persecution or discrimination with a range…

Education
5
Northern New Jersey Sanctuary Coalition Inc

This is an interfaith group assisting people applying for political asylum with housing, education, and support for job searches, activities of daily life, and integration into American life to achieve self-sufficiency.

Human Services
6
Refugee Hope Partners Inc

To engage, equip, and encourage our refugee neighbors so that all may thrive.

Human Services
7
Women for Life of Winchester Inc

Protection of the welfare of unborn children council, assistance, and promotion of the sanctity of human life in the context of Christian witness.

—
8
Tandem Living

The christ-centered mission of tandem living is to partner with and support vibrant senior living communities where residents pursue their passions, deepen their relationships, prioritize their wellness, and live fully at every age.

Housing & Shelter
9
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
10
Human Migration Institute Inc

Glocally Connected is a nonprofit organization that promotes community building to support refugee populations.

—
11
Lutheran Social Services Disaster Response Inc

Our mission is to provide help, healing and hope in the name of jesus christ.

—
12
Bridging Initiatives International

Provide holistic and integrated service that address the diverse needs of vulnerable individuals and families experiencing instability as the result of domestic violence and /or homelessness.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Goshen College Inc; the most unlike its peers is Triangle Land Conservancy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EVERENCE DONOR ADVISED FUND: $395,740 · OtherEVERENCE DONOR ADVISED FUNDEastern Mennonite University: $39,143 · OtherEastern Mennonite UniversityThe LGBTQ Center of Durham Inc: $13,000 · Human ServicesOurPath Inc: $11,000 · Human ServicesNEWBRIDGES IMMIGRANT RESOURCE CENTER: $8,000 · Human ServicesTRIANGLE LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $11,000 · EnvironmentGEMEINSCHAFT HOME INC: $11,000 · Crime & LegalMIDWIVES FOR HAITI INC: $4,160 · HealthMENNONITE HEALTHCARE FELLOWSHIP INC: $4,000 · HealthCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $5,000 · InternationalGoshen College Inc: $5,000 · Education
Other$434,883Human Services$32,000Environment$11,000Crime & Legal$11,000Health$8,160International$5,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEastern Mennonite University: $39,143 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe LGBTQ Center of Durham Inc: $13,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTRIANGLE LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGEMEINSCHAFT HOME INC: $11,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNEWBRIDGES IMMIGRANT RESOURCE CENTER: $8,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGoshen College Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWIVES FOR HAITI INC: $4,160 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…The Pfizer Foundation…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Community Foundation of Harrisonburg & Rockingham CountyVA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Harrisonburg & Rockingham County · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harry & Rosemary King Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harry & Rosemary King Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Harry & Rosemary King Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Harry & Rosemary King Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harry & Rosemary King’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home