Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harry & Rosemary King Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$396k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$396k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Philanthropy$396kEducation$44kHuman Services$32kCrime & Legal$11kEnvironment$11kInternational$9kHealth$4k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$395,740
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EVERENCE DONOR ADVISED FUND$395,740
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%LGBTQ CENTER OF DURHAM: $13k → 11%NEW BRIDGES IMMIGRANT RESOURCE CENT: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humanitarian Outreach for Migrant Emotional Health

Our purpose is to provide mental health assessment for immigrants in need by documenting their trauma histories, emotional and cognitive impact, fear of return, and other mental health factors important to their legal petitions. We also…

Human Services
2
In His Steps Pathways of Peace

Religious Humanitarian

Religion
3
Carribean Equality Project Inc

The Caribbean Equality Project is an NYC-based community organization that empowers, advocates for, and represents Afro and Indo-Caribbean LGBTQ+ immigrants in New York City.

Human Services
4
Inreach

InReach fka AsylumConnect is a trans-led tech nonprofit dedicated to building the world's first open source verified LGBTQ+ resource platform. InReach's free platform connects LGBTQ+ people facing persecution or discrimination with a range…

Education
5
Northern New Jersey Sanctuary Coalition Inc

This is an interfaith group assisting people applying for political asylum with housing, education, and support for job searches, activities of daily life, and integration into American life to achieve self-sufficiency.

Human Services
6
Refugee Hope Partners Inc

To engage, equip, and encourage our refugee neighbors so that all may thrive.

Human Services
7
Women for Life of Winchester Inc

Protection of the welfare of unborn children council, assistance, and promotion of the sanctity of human life in the context of Christian witness.

8
Tandem Living

The christ-centered mission of tandem living is to partner with and support vibrant senior living communities where residents pursue their passions, deepen their relationships, prioritize their wellness, and live fully at every age.

Housing & Shelter
9
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
10
Human Migration Institute Inc

Glocally Connected is a nonprofit organization that promotes community building to support refugee populations.

11
Lutheran Social Services Disaster Response Inc

Our mission is to provide help, healing and hope in the name of jesus christ.

12
Bridging Initiatives International

Provide holistic and integrated service that address the diverse needs of vulnerable individuals and families experiencing instability as the result of domestic violence and /or homelessness.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Goshen College Inc and the most unlike its peers is Triangle Land Conservancy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EVERENCE DONOR ADVISED FUND — $395,740 · OtherEVERENCE DONOR ADVISED FUNDEastern Mennonite University — $39,143 · OtherEastern Mennonite UniversityThe LGBTQ Center of Durham Inc — $13,000 · Human ServicesOurPath Inc — $11,000 · Human ServicesNEWBRIDGES IMMIGRANT RESOURCE CENTER — $8,000 · Human ServicesGEMEINSCHAFT HOME INC — $11,000 · Crime & LegalTRIANGLE LAND CONSERVANCY INC — $11,000 · EnvironmentMIDWIVES FOR HAITI INC — $4,160 · HealthMENNONITE HEALTHCARE FELLOWSHIP INC — $4,000 · HealthCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC — $5,000 · InternationalGoshen College Inc — $5,000 · Education
Other$434,883Human Services$32,000Crime & Legal$11,000Environment$11,000Health$8,160International$5,000Education$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEastern Mennonite University — $39,143 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe LGBTQ Center of Durham Inc — $13,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGEMEINSCHAFT HOME INC — $11,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTRIANGLE LAND CONSERVANCY INC — $11,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEWBRIDGES IMMIGRANT RESOURCE CENTER — $8,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGoshen College Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWIVES FOR HAITI INC — $4,160 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Harrisonburg & Rockingham CountyVA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Harrisonburg & Rockingham County · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harry & Rosemary King Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Harry & Rosemary King Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Harry & Rosemary King Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph