Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harrington Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2022
6
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Health$245kEducation$132kEnvironment$117kInternational$100kFood & Nutrition$68kPublic Safety & Disaster$45kHuman Services$18kReligion$13kOther$0
02FY2022 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k3 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $38k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION$15,000
SCOTTSDALE BIBLE CHURCH$12,500
MCDOWELL SONORAN CONSERVANCY$10,000
MAYO CLINIC$5,000
ARIZONA JEWS FOR JUSTICE$1,000
ST MARY'S FOOD BANK$465
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%Green Beret Foundation: $3k → 16%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%Green Beret Foundation: $3k → 16%American Red Cross: $25k → 14%Hospice of the Valley: $25k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
IN
CT
CA
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$563k · 18 repeat orgs$181k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2022, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
13

Total granted

$563k
$167k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+33%

Still filing today

72%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
    5× · 2017–2021 · $150k · revenue +384%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $70k · revenue +21%
  • A
    ACCEL
    2× · 2020–2021 · $50k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • D
    DESPERADOS
    one grant, 2020 · $77k
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +46%
  • AC
    AZ Centers for Comp Education Life
    one grant, 2019 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
2
Arizona Food Bank Network

Develop solutions to end hunger through food banking, public policy and innovation.

Food & Nutrition
3
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

4
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
5
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
6
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
7
Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum

We inspire people to live in harmony with the natural world by fostering love, appreciation, and understanding of the sonoran desert.

Arts & Culture
8
Honorhealth

Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.

Health
9
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
10
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
11
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
12
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of the Valley and the most unlike its peers is Phoenix Children's Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLand Conservation Organizat…Developmental Disabilities …Food Pantries & AssistanceClassical Music EnsemblesHospice Care ServicesCancer Support OrganizationsVeteran Support ServicesCommunity Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%42%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%15%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%7%20–35yr13%52%35–55yr16%22%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 15% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,538

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
20/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AZ Centers for Comp Education Life — $25,000 · OtherAZ Centers for Comp Educatio…AMERICAN RED CROSS — $20,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSKansas University Endowment Fund — $20,000 · OtherKansas University Endowment …BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC — $15,000 · OtherBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK IN…SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $15,000 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANKSCOTTSDALE BIBLE CHURCH — $12,500 · OtherSCOTTSDALE BIBLE CHURCHIndiana State University — $12,500 · OtherIndiana State UniversityKU ENDOWMENT FUND — $10,000 · OtherPHOENIX CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUND — $10,000 · OtherMELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $9,000 · OtherTHE FAMILY GIVING TREE — $9,000 · OtherHope For The Warriors — $10,000 · Other+7 more — $23,500 · Other+7 moreTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $150,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATI…Phoenix Children's Hospital — $20,000 · HealthPhoenix Children's Hospita…+2 more — $5,500 · HealthDESPERADOS — $76,540 · EnvironmentDESPERADOSMCDOWELL SONORAN CONSERVANCY — $40,000 · EnvironmentMCDOWELL SONORAN …Save The Children Federation Inc — $70,000 · InternationalSave The Childr…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $25,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS F…WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS — $5,000 · InternationalHospice of the Valley — $50,000 · Human ServicesHospice of t…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $25,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nat…GREEN BERET FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Human ServicesGREEN BERET …ACCEL — $50,000 · EducationCHILDREN FIRST FOUNDATION — $2,500 · EducationST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $27,965 · Food & Nutrition
Other$191,500Health$175,500Environment$116,540International$100,000Human Services$85,000Education$52,500Food & Nutrition$27,965

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $150,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $70,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetACCEL — $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHospice of the Valley — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMCDOWELL SONORAN CONSERVANCY — $40,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $27,965 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC — $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN BERET FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHope For The Warriors — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FAMILY GIVING TREE — $9,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA MUSICFEST INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN FIRST FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harrington Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals67% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph