Skip to content
Harralson Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Harralson Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$46kEducation$40kFood & Nutrition$16kArts & Culture$16kAnimals$8kCrime & Legal$5kYouth Development$3kPhilanthropy$500
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,740
Median grant
3
States reached
$492k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Piedmont Park Conservancy$8,800
University of Kentucky$5,000
Meals On Wheels Atlanta$3,000
Georgia Committee National Museum of Women in the Arts$1,740
Best Friends Animal Society$1,000
Fernbank Museum$500
Ansley Park Beautification Foundation$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MEALS ON WHEELS ATLANTA: $4k → 14%GEORGIA CAMPAIGN FOR ADOLESCENT POWER & POTENTIAL: $3k → 13%MEALS ON WHEELS: $3k → 14%Meals On Wheels Atlanta: $3k → 14%Meals On Wheels Atlanta: $3k → 14%Meals On Wheels Atlanta: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$124k · 8 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
7

Total granted

$124k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+29%

Still filing today

75%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    Piedmont Park Conservancy Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $44k · revenue +182%
  • MO
    Meals on Wheels Atlanta Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $13k · revenue +27%
  • RW
    ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $9k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS OF MIDDLE GEORGIA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +31%
  • GC
    Georgia Campaign for Adolescent Power and Potential Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +29%
  • GC
    Ga CommNational Museum Women In Arts
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dunwoody Nature Center Inc

Inspires the love of nature and cultivates environmental understanding and stewardship by: (1)Conserving and enhancing Dunwoody Park (2)Educating children, families and adults of all ages about the natural world and our place in…

Environment
2
Historic Oakland Foundation Inc

The Historic Oakland Foundation partners with the City of Atlanta to preserve, restore, enhance, and share Oakland Cemetery with the public as an important island of tranquilty in the heart of the city.

—
3
Georgia Institute on Aging Inc

The Institute is the leading provider of timely and informative educational opportunities for its members and the residents they serve, state and local policy makers, as well as professionals in the field of aging and the community at large

Health
4
FixGeorgiaPets Inc

To end senseless euthanasia and stop pet over-population in Georgia through targed spay/neuter programming.

Animals
5
Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce Inc

The corporation is a voluntary association of individuals and organizations the purposes of which are to upgrade and advance the atlanta metropolitan area in population, commerce and finance; to effect civic and social improvements; to…

—
6
Georgia Interfaith Power & Light Inc

Georgia Interfaith Power and Light (GIPL) inspires and equips communities of faith to organize, implement practical climate solutions, and advocate across Georgia on issues of climate change, environmental justice, and community resilience.

Environment
7
Cobb Collaborative Inc

The mission of the Cobb Collaborative is to convene community stakeholders to facilitate the sharing of ideas, expertise and resources to meet needs and resolve issues in Cobb County. The vision is that all individuals, families, and…

Community Improvement
8
Atlanta Committee for Progress Inc

ACP is a group committed to identifying and providing leadership on selected issues important to driving the economic development of the city of Atlanta and for which the ACP's active involvement will make a major difference. The ACP has a…

—
9
The African Diasporic Art Museum of Atlanta Inc

to showcase contemporary art and culture of the African Diaspora

Arts & Culture
10
Girls on the Run Georgia Inc

Girls on the Run Georgia empowers girls with vital social-emotional skills to help them succeed in school, at home, and within friendships. Our programs, Girls on the Run (3rd-5th grade) and Heart & Sole (6th-8th grade) are taught by…

Youth Development
11
Asian Americans Advancing Justice Atlanta Inc

Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Atlanta's mission is to protect and promote the civil and human rights of Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders in Georgia and the Southeast through policy advocacy, legal services,…

Human Services
12
Midtown Greenway Coalition

Our mission is to empower communities to develop, improve, protect, and enjoy the Midtown Greenway as a green urban corridor to improve people's lives.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Park Pride Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ansley Park Beautification Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $45,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKYPiedmont Park Conservancy Inc: $43,905 · OtherPiedmont Park Conservancy Inc+5 more: $6,740 · Other+5 moreMeals on Wheels Atlanta Inc: $13,000 · Human ServicesMeals on Wheels…MEALS ON WHEELS OF MIDDLE GEORGIA INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS…Georgia Campaign for Adolescent Power and Potential Inc: $2,500 · Human ServicesGeorgia Campaig…ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $9,200 · Arts & CultureROBERT W …MUSEUM OF DESIGN-ATLANTA INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF…Fernbank Inc: $500 · Arts & CultureBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $8,000 · AnimalsTHE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC: $500 · PhilanthropyPARK PRIDE INC: $250 · Recreation & Sports
Other$95,645Human Services$18,500Arts & Culture$10,700Animals$8,000Philanthropy$500Recreation & Sports$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPiedmont Park Conservancy Inc: $43,905 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMeals on Wheels Atlanta Inc: $13,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $9,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF MIDDLE GEORGIA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGeorgia Campaign for Adolescent Power and Potential Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANSLEY PARK BEAUTIFICATION FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMUSEUM OF DESIGN-ATLANTA INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARK PRIDE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Virginia & Charle…The Imlay Foundation …The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Virginia & Charles Brewer Family FoundationGA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Virginia & Charles Brewer Family Foundation · The Imlay Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harralson Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harralson Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harralson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home