· Community foundation
Harper County Community Foundation
The foundation recieves and accepts property to be administered exclusively for charitable purposes in the harper county community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 14 grants below total $289,071 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $513,975 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $224,904 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $206k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| USD 361 | $59,508 |
| HARPER COUNTY | $37,931 |
| USD 511 | $37,397 |
| CITY OF ANTHONY KANSAS | $24,000 |
| CITY OF ATTICA | $20,695 |
| HARPER COUNTY CORE COMMUNITY | $20,000 |
| HPCO HEART INC | $19,000 |
| ANTHONY GUN CLUB | $12,040 |
| HARPER COUNTY COMMUNITY HOPE | $12,000 |
| THE CHRISITAN CHURCH OF ANTHONY KANSAS | $12,000 |
| ANTHONY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER INC | $11,200 |
| THE ARTS CENTER INC | $9,000 |
| PATTERSON HEALTH CENTER (HARPER CO HOSPITAL DIST 6) | $8,300 |
| ATTICA LONG TERM CARE | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +3% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YCYOUTH CORE MINISTRIES INC7× · 2019–2025 · $152k · revenue +75%
- ACARTS CENTER INC5× · 2017–2025 · $72k · revenue +3% · 28% of their budget
- ACAnthony Community Care Center Inc3× · 2023–2025 · $33k · revenue +24%
Funded once
- SJST JOAN OF ARC PARISHone grant, 2024 · $113k
- PVPLEASANT VALLEY MENNONITE CHURCH INCone grant, 2017 · $13k
- HCHarper County Health Foundationone grant, 2024 · $11k · revenue -37%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Community Center in the city of Anthon
The Anderson County Community Action Commission provides food, clothing, household foods, and essential assistance to low-income residents of Anderson County, Tennessee. The organization operates a community food pantry, clothing closet,…
An amateur community theater organization to contribute to the greater nashua community through high quality amateur theater productions (primarily musicals), encouraging the development of performance and production skills.
The colby/thomas county chamber of commerce promotes thomas county kansas and the surrounding area as an excellent place to live, work, shop and visit.
Operate the Nodaway County Senior Center The Nodaway County Senior Citizens Senate, Inc operates the Nodaway County Senior Citizens center located in Maryville, Mo. The Center serves as
Senior center
Public arts and entertainment
Preserve and maintain memorial building
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Anthony Community Care Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Harper County Health Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YOUTH CORE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ANTHONY THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds MINISTERIAL ASSOCIATION OF ANTHONY ↗
- Who funds Anthony Community Care Center Inc ↗
- Who funds COUNTRY LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds ATTICA SADDLE CLUB ↗
- Who funds Harper County Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF KANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds ANTHONY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Harper County Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.