Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harold Webster Smith Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$264k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$103k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$1.1MHuman Services$150kArts & Culture$140kCivil Rights$90kPublic Benefit$68kCommunity Improvement$60kEducation$23kPhilanthropy$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $203k
$17,409
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEIGHBORWORKS NEW HORIZONS$103,000
WATERBURY LAND BANK AUTHORITY$100,000
HISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY INC$20,000
CT COUNCIL OF PHILANTHROPY$17,409
UCONN FOUNDATION INC$12,875
UNITED WAY OF GREATER WATERBURY EMERGENCY FUND$10,000
REGIONAL PLAN ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%REGIONAL PLAN ASSOCIATION: $1k → 17%CT COUNCIL OF PHILANTHROPY: $17k → 11%WATERBURY LAND BANK AUTHORITY: $100k → 11%POLICE ACTIVITY LEAGUE OF WATERBURY INC: $13k → 12%CT COUNCIL OF PHILANTHROPY: $17k → 11%WATERBURY LAND BANK AUTHORITY: $100k → 11%CITY OF WATERBURY: $68k → 12%LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $5k → 11%WATERBURY LAND BANK AUTHORITY: $75k → 11%MATTATUCK MUSEUM (MATTATUCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY): $50k → 12%WATERBURY LAND BANK AUTHORITY: $75k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER WATERBURY: $50k → 12%WATERBURY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $25k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER WATERBURY: $50k → 12%WATERBURY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $20k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER WATERBURY: $50k → 12%UNITED WAY OF GREATER WATERBURY EMERGENCY FUND: $10k → 11%MATTATUCK MUSEUM: $50k → 12%WATERBURY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10k → 11%MATTATUCK MUSEUM (MATTATUCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY): $40k → 12%UCONN FOUNDATION INC: $13k → 11%UNITED WAY OF GREATER WATERBURY: $8k → 12%UCONN FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 11%GREATER INTERFAITH WATERBURY MINISTRIES: $3k → 12%WATERBURY COMMUNITY INVESTMENT LLC: $150k → 12%NEIGHBORWORKS NEW HORIZONS: $103k → 12%NEIGHBORWORKS NEW HORIZONS: $100k → 12%NEIGHBORWORKS NEW HORIZONS: $100k → 12%NEIGHBORWORKS NEW HORIZONS: $100k → 12%NEIGHBORWORKS NEW HORIZONS: $100k → 12%NEIGHBORWORKS NEW HORIZONS: $75k → 12%HISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY INC: $20k → 12%HISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY INC: $20k → 12%HISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY INC: $20k → 12%HISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY INC: $10k → 12%HISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY INC: $10k → 12%HISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY INC: $5k → 12%HISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY INC: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 70% of Harold Webster Smith Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Harold Webster Smith Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 8 repeat orgs$308k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +137% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$1.4M
$297k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+137%
+13%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WL
    WATERBURY LAND BANK AUTHORITY INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $350k · revenue +137%
  • HC
    HISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $90k · revenue +212%
  • WD
    WATERBURY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $55k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • WC
    WATERBURY COMMUNITY INVESTMENT LLC
    one grant, 2019 · $150k
  • CO
    CITY OF WATERBURY
    one grant, 2019 · $68k
  • MH
    MATTATUCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western Connecticut Area Agency On Aging Inc

The western connecticut area agency on aging, inc. (wcaaa) develops, manages and provides comprehensive services through person centered planning for seniors, caregivers and individuals with disabilities in order to maintain their…

Human Services
2
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
3
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
4
Greater New Bedford Workforce Investment Board Inc

Meet the workforce needs of employers and support economic development in greater new bedford.

Community Improvement
5
Washington Water Trust

Wwt's mission is to protect and restore water in rivers and streams across washington state. washington water trust restores and protects water in rivers and streams and promotes sustainable freshwater management in washington, and, more…

Environment
6
The Connecticut Community Foundation

To foster an equitable and inclusive community in greater waterbury and litchfield hills by inspiring generosity, supporting organizations, and cultivating effective leaders. the foundation works to address the community's critical issues,…

Philanthropy
7
Westbrook Development Corporation
—
8
The Westerly Land Trust

The westerly land trust conserves open space, revitalizes culturally significant properties, and provides environmental programs for the enduring benefit of our community.

—
9
West Alabama Regional Commission

The general purpose of the west alabama regional commission is to plan for the unified and far-reaching development of the west alabama region, eliminate duplication of services by member governments, and promote economy and efficiency…

Community Improvement
10
Westchester County Association Inc

The mission of the westchester county association is to maintain a position as the center of influence for business advocacy issues on behalf of our membership as well as enhancing the economic vitality of the region. we will be committed…

—
11
Waterbury Hospital Foundation

The foundation facilitates equitable access to healthcare services for the greater waterbury community. our founding principles are to provide for the healthcare needs (including medical equipment and expenses) of the 13-town greater…

Health
12
The Community Action Agency of Western Connecticut Inc

The community action agency of western connecticut is a private non-profit corporation serving western connecticut. its primary purpose is to operate a multi-purpose organization to combat poverty and promote self sufficiency among low…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The United Way of Greater Waterbury Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mattatuck Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEIGHBORWORKS NEW HORIZONS: $578,000 · OtherNEIGHBORWORKS NEW HORIZONSYMCA OF GREATER WATERBURY: $150,000 · OtherYMCA OF GREATER WATERBURYWATERBURY COMMUNITY INVESTMENT LLC: $150,000 · OtherWATERBURY COMMUNITY INVESTMENT LLCMATTATUCK MUSEUM (MATTATUCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY): $90,000 · OtherMATTATUCK MUSEUM (MATTATUCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY)HISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY: $90,000 · OtherHISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURYCITY OF WATERBURY: $67,788 · OtherCITY OF WATERBURY+5 more: $57,108 · OtherWATERBURY LAND BANK AUTHORITY INC: $350,000 · Housing & ShelterWATERBURY LAND BANK AUT…WATERBURY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $54,682 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $4,500 · Community Improvement+1 more: $1,000 · Community ImprovementMATTATUCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $50,000 · Arts & CultureTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC: $22,875 · EducationPOLICE ACTIVITY LEAGUE OF WATERBURY: $12,500 · Youth Development
Other$1,182,896Housing & Shelter$350,000Community Improvement$60,182Arts & Culture$50,000Education$22,875Youth Development$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWATERBURY LAND BANK AUTHORITY INC: $350,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetHISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY: $90,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetWATERBURY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $54,682 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetMATTATUCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC: $22,875 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOLICE ACTIVITY LEAGUE OF WATERBURY: $12,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF GREATER WATERBURY INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL PLAN ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WATERBURY LAND BANK AUTHORITY INC ↗
  • Who funds HISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY ↗
  • Who funds WATERBURY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MATTATUCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds POLICE ACTIVITY LEAGUE OF WATERBURY ↗
  • Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF GREATER WATERBURY INC ↗
  • Who funds LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL PLAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Connecticut Community FoundationCT22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Connecticut Community Foundation · Ion Bank Foundation Inc · Webster Bank Charitable Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harold Webster Smith Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harold Webster Smith Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 53%
  • Waterbury Land Bank Authority Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Hispanic Coalition of Greater Waterbury: 53% of income from government
  • Waterbury Development Corporation: 47% of income from government
  • The United Way of Greater Waterbury Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Harold Webster Smith Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Harold Webster Smith Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harold Webster Smith’s filings →

More from the funding graph