Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harold Webster Smith Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$264k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$103k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Housing & Shelter$1.1MHuman Services$150kArts & Culture$140kCivil Rights$90kPublic Benefit$68kCommunity Improvement$60kEducation$23kPhilanthropy$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $203k
$17,409
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEIGHBORWORKS NEW HORIZONS$103,000
WATERBURY LAND BANK AUTHORITY$100,000
HISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY INC$20,000
CT COUNCIL OF PHILANTHROPY$17,409
UCONN FOUNDATION INC$12,875
UNITED WAY OF GREATER WATERBURY EMERGENCY FUND$10,000
REGIONAL PLAN ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 72% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%REGIONAL PLAN ASSOCIATION: $1k → 17%CT COUNCIL OF PHILANTHROPY: $17k → 11%WATERBURY LAND BANK AUTHORITY: $100k → 11%POLICE ACTIVITY LEAGUE OF WATERBURY INC: $13k → 12%CT COUNCIL OF PHILANTHROPY: $17k → 11%WATERBURY LAND BANK AUTHORITY: $100k → 11%CITY OF WATERBURY: $68k → 12%LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $5k → 11%WATERBURY LAND BANK AUTHORITY: $75k → 11%MATTATUCK MUSEUM (MATTATUCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY): $50k → 12%WATERBURY LAND BANK AUTHORITY: $75k → 11%MATTATUCK MUSEUM: $50k → 12%WATERBURY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $25k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER WATERBURY: $50k → 12%WATERBURY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $20k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER WATERBURY: $50k → 12%UNITED WAY OF GREATER WATERBURY EMERGENCY FUND: $10k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER WATERBURY: $50k → 12%WATERBURY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10k → 11%MATTATUCK MUSEUM (MATTATUCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY): $40k → 12%UCONN FOUNDATION INC: $13k → 11%UNITED WAY OF GREATER WATERBURY: $8k → 12%UCONN FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 11%GREATER INTERFAITH WATERBURY MINISTRIES: $3k → 12%WATERBURY COMMUNITY INVESTMENT LLC: $150k → 12%NEIGHBORWORKS NEW HORIZONS: $103k → 12%NEIGHBORWORKS NEW HORIZONS: $100k → 12%NEIGHBORWORKS NEW HORIZONS: $100k → 12%NEIGHBORWORKS NEW HORIZONS: $100k → 12%NEIGHBORWORKS NEW HORIZONS: $100k → 12%NEIGHBORWORKS NEW HORIZONS: $75k → 12%HISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY INC: $20k → 12%HISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY INC: $20k → 12%HISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY INC: $20k → 12%HISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY INC: $10k → 12%HISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY INC: $10k → 12%HISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY INC: $5k → 12%HISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY INC: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 70% of Harold Webster Smith Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Harold Webster Smith Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 8 repeat orgs$308k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +137% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$1.4M
$297k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+137%
+13%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterArts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WL
    WATERBURY LAND BANK AUTHORITY INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $350k · revenue +137%
  • HC
    HISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $90k · revenue +212%
  • WD
    WATERBURY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $55k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • WC
    WATERBURY COMMUNITY INVESTMENT LLC
    one grant, 2019 · $150k
  • CO
    CITY OF WATERBURY
    one grant, 2019 · $68k
  • MH
    MATTATUCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western Connecticut Area Agency On Aging Inc

The western connecticut area agency on aging, inc. (wcaaa) develops, manages and provides comprehensive services through person centered planning for seniors, caregivers and individuals with disabilities in order to maintain their…

Human Services
2
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
3
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
4
Greater New Bedford Workforce Investment Board Inc

Meet the workforce needs of employers and support economic development in greater new bedford.

Community Improvement
5
Washington Water Trust

Wwt's mission is to protect and restore water in rivers and streams across washington state. washington water trust restores and protects water in rivers and streams and promotes sustainable freshwater management in washington, and, more…

Environment
6
The Connecticut Community Foundation

To foster an equitable and inclusive community in greater waterbury and litchfield hills by inspiring generosity, supporting organizations, and cultivating effective leaders. the foundation works to address the community's critical issues,…

Philanthropy
7
Westbrook Development Corporation
8
The Westerly Land Trust

The westerly land trust conserves open space, revitalizes culturally significant properties, and provides environmental programs for the enduring benefit of our community.

9
West Alabama Regional Commission

The general purpose of the west alabama regional commission is to plan for the unified and far-reaching development of the west alabama region, eliminate duplication of services by member governments, and promote economy and efficiency…

Community Improvement
10
Westchester County Association Inc

The mission of the westchester county association is to maintain a position as the center of influence for business advocacy issues on behalf of our membership as well as enhancing the economic vitality of the region. we will be committed…

11
Waterbury Hospital Foundation

The foundation facilitates equitable access to healthcare services for the greater waterbury community. our founding principles are to provide for the healthcare needs (including medical equipment and expenses) of the 13-town greater…

Health
12
The Community Action Agency of Western Connecticut Inc

The community action agency of western connecticut is a private non-profit corporation serving western connecticut. its primary purpose is to operate a multi-purpose organization to combat poverty and promote self sufficiency among low…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The United Way of Greater Waterbury Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mattatuck Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEIGHBORWORKS NEW HORIZONS — $578,000 · OtherNEIGHBORWORKS NEW HORIZONSYMCA OF GREATER WATERBURY — $150,000 · OtherYMCA OF GREATER WATERBURYWATERBURY COMMUNITY INVESTMENT LLC — $150,000 · OtherWATERBURY COMMUNITY INVESTMENT LLCMATTATUCK MUSEUM (MATTATUCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY) — $90,000 · OtherMATTATUCK MUSEUM (MATTATUCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY)HISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY — $90,000 · OtherHISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURYCITY OF WATERBURY — $67,788 · OtherCITY OF WATERBURY+5 more — $57,108 · OtherWATERBURY LAND BANK AUTHORITY INC — $350,000 · Housing & ShelterWATERBURY LAND BANK AUT…WATERBURY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $54,682 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $4,500 · Community Improvement+1 more — $1,000 · Community ImprovementMATTATUCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $50,000 · Arts & CultureTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC — $22,875 · EducationPOLICE ACTIVITY LEAGUE OF WATERBURY — $12,500 · Youth Development
Other$1,182,896Housing & Shelter$350,000Community Improvement$60,182Arts & Culture$50,000Education$22,875Youth Development$12,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWATERBURY LAND BANK AUTHORITY INC — $350,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetHISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY — $90,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetWATERBURY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $54,682 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetMATTATUCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC — $22,875 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOLICE ACTIVITY LEAGUE OF WATERBURY — $12,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF GREATER WATERBURY INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL PLAN ASSOCIATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WATERBURY LAND BANK AUTHORITY INC
  • Who funds HISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY
  • Who funds WATERBURY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
  • Who funds MATTATUCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds POLICE ACTIVITY LEAGUE OF WATERBURY
  • Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF GREATER WATERBURY INC
  • Who funds LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION
  • Who funds REGIONAL PLAN ASSOCIATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Connecticut Community FoundationCT22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Connecticut Community Foundation · Ion Bank Foundation Inc · Webster Bank Charitable Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harold Webster Smith Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 53%
  • Waterbury Land Bank Authority Inc100% of income from government
  • Hispanic Coalition of Greater Waterbury53% of income from government
  • Waterbury Development Corporation47% of income from government
  • The United Way of Greater Waterbury Inc6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Harold Webster Smith Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Harold Webster Smith Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph