· Private foundation
Hargreaves Family Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k35 grants · $71k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA | $5,000 |
| DARBSTER FOUNDATION | $4,500 |
| WPB COYOTES INC | $4,000 |
| CHILD PROTECTION SERVICES | $3,000 |
| ALL STAR CHILDRENS FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY HILLSBORO | $3,000 |
| TOY INDUSTRY FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| HASBRO CHILDRENS HOSPITAL | $2,500 |
| BRIDGE A LIFE | $2,500 |
| CHILDREN MIRACLE NETWORK | $2,500 |
| TAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL | $2,500 |
| CHILDREN FIRST | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
42 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- APACADEMY PREP CENTER OF TAMPA INC5× · 2020–2024 · $51k · revenue +59%
- TDTHE DARBSTER FOUNDATION INC5× · 2020–2024 · $15k · revenue +199%
- OIONBIKES INC5× · 2020–2024 · $12k · revenue +172%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2023–2024 · $5k
- SRSMART RIDE MIAMI TO KW2× · 2023–2024 · $4k
DIRECT RELIEF2× · 2023–2024 · $3k · revenue +6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Harbor house strives to prevent and break the cycle of domestic abuse through empowerment-based programs, advocacy, education, and community involvement.
Providing compassion, respect, and loving care to each individual on their unique adoption journey. We commit to honoring and nurturing expectant mothers through pregnancy, birth, and life after placement.
The mission of the child protection center, inc. is the prevention, intervention and treatment of child abuse. we envision a community where children are safe from abuse and free to thrive. to successfully address the issue of child abuse,…
To deliver a well coordinated and multi-disciplined response to child abuse in an environment that puts children first
To provide a temporary home and on-going support for pregnant women, and women with newborns over the age of 18 who are alone. counseling and educational programs prepare these women to make loving and informed decisions for themselves and…
Samaritan House is committed to fostering personal safety, growth, and self-sufficiency in adults and their children through freedom from domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking and removing their risks of homelessness.
To get our neighbors experiencing homelessness off the street through proactive outreach and services and provide placement in a program that will help them get "home."
To assist in the rescue and care of abandoned and orphaned children in the developing world and to advocate for them by creating awareness of their plight within Christian churches.
Lead agency in the community for providers of homeless/prevention services in manatee/sarasota. responsible to plan strategies with community partners, assist with grants, educate the public, advocate with local leadership, administer the…
The corporation is organized for the purpose of permanently reducing the number of homeless individuals and families in the central florida region.
The organization's mission is to harness the power of business to create choices for survivors of human trafficking.
Better together helps at-risk families by empowering parents and surrounding them with community, meaningful work opportunities, and practical support. our volunteer-driven, professionally supported model provides direct services so that…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Adoption Rhode Island and the most unlike its peers is Dharma Bears Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ACADEMY PREP CENTER OF TAMPA INC ↗
- Who funds THE DARBSTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ONBIKES INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE A LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC ↗
- Who funds Children First Inc ↗
- Who funds SARASOTA SHARKS INC ↗
- Who funds ALL STAR CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity Sarasota Inc ↗
- Who funds WPB COYOTES ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA CO INC ↗
- Who funds COMPASS INC ↗
- Who funds Humane Society of Tampa Bay Inc ↗
- Who funds Dharma Bears Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds INNER CITY INNOVATORS INC ↗
- Who funds ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds BREAST HEALTH SARASOTA INC ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds ADOPTION RHODE ISLAND ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PLACE OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds SECOND HEART HOMES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · The Tillie Jennie & Harold Schwartz Foundation Inc · Msc Foundation Inc · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Boscia Family Foundation · The Louis and Gloria Flanzer Philanthropic Trust · Charles & Margery Barancik Foundation Inc · Seidman Family Foundation · Manatee Community Foundation Inc · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hargreaves Family Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Children First Inc — 100% of income from government
- Safe Place and Rape Crisis Center Inc — 23% of income from government
- Academy Prep Center of Tampa Inc — 3% of income from government
- Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc — 2% of income from government
- All Faiths Food Bank Inc — 1% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc — 0% of income from government
- Place of Hope Inc — 0% of income from government
- Onbikes Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.