Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hardy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$58k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$52kPublic Safety & Disaster$41kCrime & Legal$30kArts & Culture$25kHuman Services$20kFood & Nutrition$11kHealth$9kCivil Rights$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
$1,750
Median grant
8
States reached
$697k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS$13,690
CINCINNATI FIRE MUSEUM$12,000
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI-INNOCENCE PROJECT$10,000
XAVIER UNIVERSITY$6,000
FIRST STEP HOME$3,300
AFRICA FIRE MISSION$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,900
FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION$1,750
INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE$1,500
GIVE DIRECTLY$1,500
FUNERAL SERVICE FOUNDATION$1,000
LAND TRUST ALLIANCE$1,000
CINCINNATI PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION$1,000
CHAMCHAMBLISS CENTER FOR CHILDREN$500
FRIENDS OF MUSIC HALL$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FIRST STEP HOME: $3k → 16%FIRST STEP HOME: $3k → 16%FIRST STEP HOME: $3k → 16%FIRST STEP HOME: $3k → 16%FIRST STEP HOME: $1k → 16%CINCINNATI WORKS: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
OH
PA
VA
KS
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$204k · 18 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
6

Total granted

$204k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+11%

Still filing today

72%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureCivil RightsHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CINCINNATI FIRE MUSEUM
    5× · 2020–2024 · $34k · revenue +46%
  • CI
    Cincinnati Institute of Fine Arts
    3× · 2020–2022 · $18k · revenue +2%
  • XU
    XAVIER UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2021–2024 · $13k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • CM
    CASS - MEALS ON WHEELS
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • CY
    Cincinnati Youth Collaborative
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +22%
  • SO
    SPARK OF LIFE
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
Cincinnati Museum Center

Cincinnati museum center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science, regional history, and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences.

Arts & Culture
3
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
4
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
5
Museum of American Finance

Finance impacts everyone. as a socially relevant organization, the museum of american finance seeks to improve understanding of the influence of financial institutions and capital markets on the u.s. and global economies, and on…

—
6
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
7
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
8
Cleveland Institute of Music

The cleveland institute of music's mission is to empower the world's most talented classical music students to fulfill their dreams and potential.

Education
9
The Greater Cincinnati Foundation

As a trusted and connected partner, we inspire generous people to invest in a more equitable and vibrant region now and for generations to come.

Philanthropy
10
Cincinnati Museum Association

Through the power of art, we contribute to a more vibrant cincinnati by inspiring its people and connecting our communities.

Arts & Culture
11
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
12
Ohio State Bar Association

The ohio state bar association (the "association") is an unincorporated voluntary non-profit organization. the association was formed to promote justice and advance the interests of the legal profession.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naacp Legal Defense & Educ Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Africa Fire Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS: $34,675 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KANSASUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI-INNOCENCE PROJECT: $25,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI-INNOCENCE PROJECTPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $8,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODIndividual grant recipient: $7,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWHARTON SCHOOL-UNIV OF PENNSYLVANIA: $4,000 · OtherFUNERAL SERVICE FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · Other+5 more: $6,544 · Other+5 moreCINCINNATI FIRE MUSEUM: $33,723 · Arts & CultureCINCINNATI FIRE MUSEUMCincinnati Institute of Fine Arts: $17,600 · Arts & CultureCincinnati Institute of Fine Ar…CINCINNATI PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCINCINNATI PRESERVATION ASSOCIA…FRIENDS OF MUSIC HALL: $2,500 · Arts & CultureTHE FIRST STEP HOME INC: $12,550 · Human ServicesTHE FIRST…GIVEDIRECTLY INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesGIVEDIREC…CINCINNATI WORKS: $1,000 · Human ServicesCINCINNAT…XAVIER UNIVERSITY: $13,000 · EducationCincinnati Youth Collaborative: $1,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC: $5,500 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $4,750 · Civil RightsNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $800 · Civil RightsLA SOUPE INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionAFRICA FIRE MISSION: $7,300 · International
Other$91,119Arts & Culture$58,823Human Services$18,550Education$14,000Civil Rights$11,050Food & Nutrition$10,000International$7,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCINCINNATI FIRE MUSEUM: $33,723 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetCincinnati Institute of Fine Arts: $17,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FIRST STEP HOME INC: $12,550 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLA SOUPE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAFRICA FIRE MISSION: $7,300 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCINCINNATI PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $4,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFUNERAL SERVICE FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHAMBLISS CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF MUSIC HALL: $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCincinnati Youth Collaborative: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCINCINNATI WORKS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CINCINNATI FIRE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Cincinnati Institute of Fine Arts ↗
  • Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE FIRST STEP HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds LA SOUPE INC ↗
  • Who funds AFRICA FIRE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC ↗
  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds FUNERAL SERVICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAMBLISS CENTER FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MUSIC HALL ↗
  • Who funds Cincinnati Youth Collaborative ↗
  • Who funds LAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI WORKS ↗
  • Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Ed & Joann Hubert Family Foundation Inc · Marge & Charles J Schott Foundation · Farmer Family Foundation · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hardy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hardy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hardy Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hardy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $62k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hardy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph