Skip to content

· Public charity

Happy Hippie Foundation

The HAPPY HIPPIE FOUNDATION rallies young people to fight injustice and provides homeless youth, lgbtq youth, and other vulnerable populations with support services, direct needs services, and prevention services.

$474k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$1.5MYouth Development$790kCivil Rights$100kCommunity Improvement$48kFood & Nutrition$10k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $434k
$75,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$7k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MY FRIEND'S PLACE$200,000
DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER$159,023
OASIS CENTER$75,000
TRUE COLORS UNITED$25,000
HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $354k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER: $159k → 14%HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE: $45k → 17%HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE: $30k → 17%BEAUTY 2 THE STREETZ: $30k → 14%HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE: $25k → 17%HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE: $25k → 17%HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE: $25k → 17%HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 6 repeat orgs$599k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
6

Total granted

$1.9M
$440k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+34%

Still filing today

100%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $159k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCivil RightsHousing & ShelterPublic Safety & DisasterInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    M F PLACE INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +95%
  • OC
    OASIS CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $308k · revenue +24%
  • TH
    THE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $165k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • MF
    MALIBU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $300k · revenue -97%
  • SO
    SEEDS OF PEACE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue -51%
  • B2
    Beauty 2 The Streetzgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +75%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lesbian and Gay Community Services Center Inc

EMPOWERING LGBT PEOPLE, BUILDING STRONG COMMUNITY. NEW YORK CITY'S LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, & TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER EMPOWERS PEOPLE TO LEAD HEALTHY, SUCCESSFUL LIVES. The Center celebrates our community and advocates for justice and…

Human Services
2
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
3
Covenant House

In 34 cities across five countries, covenant house builds bridges to hope for young people facing homelessness and survivors of human trafficking. we meet their immediate needs for food, clothing, protection, and medical and mental health…

Human Services
4
1N10 Inc

To provide support and resources for the local lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning (lgbtq) youth. to provide youth with life and leadership skills and the tools to improve self esteem and acceptance of who they are.

Civil Rights
5
The San Diego Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Community Center

The san diego lgbt community center enhances and sustains the health & well-being of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, transgender, nonbinary, immigrant, and hiv communities to the betterment of our entire san diego region.

Health
6
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

—
7
The Attic Youth Center

The attic youth center creates opportunities for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning (lgbtq) youth to develop into healthy, independent, civic-minded adults within a safe and supportive community, and promotes the…

Youth Development
8
Covenant House California

Covenant house is dedicated to serving all of god's children with absolute respect and unconditional love to help youth experiencing homelessness and to protect and safeguard all youth in need.

Human Services
9
Covenant House New Orleans

Covenant house new orleans (the organization) is a not-for-profit organization affiliated with 34 similar organizations across five countries, all of which are affiliates of covenant house international (parent affiliate) and share a…

Human Services
10
Urban Peak Denver

Urban peak helps youth experiencing homelessness and youth at risk of becoming homeless overcome real life challenges by providing essential services and a supportive community, empowering them to become self-sufficient adults.

Housing & Shelter
11
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
12
Under 21

Since 1972, under 21, d.b.a. covenant house new york (chny) has been working with one of new york city's most vulnerable populations - youth experiencing homelessness, age 16-24, and their dependent children. chny provides young people…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Zebra Youth Inc; the most unlike its peers is Malibu Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

M F PLACE INC: $1,020,000 · Housing & ShelterM F PLACE INCTHE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC: $165,000 · Human ServicesTHE HETRICK-MART…DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $159,023 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S…Beauty 2 The Streetz: $30,000 · Human ServicesBeauty 2 The Str…OASIS CENTER INC: $308,000 · Community ImprovementOASIS CENTER I…MALIBU FOUNDATION: $300,000 · Public Safety & DisasterMALIBU FOUNDA…Gender Spectrum Charitable Fund: $200,000 · Civil RightsGender Spe…TRUE COLORS UNITED INC: $35,000 · Civil RightsTRUE COLOR…LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $135,000 · OtherPRIDE AND LESS PREJUDICE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · OtherZEBRA YOUTH INC: $25,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF MIDDLE TN INC: $10,000 · OtherSEEDS OF PEACE INC: $50,000 · International
Housing & Shelter$1,020,000Human Services$354,023Community Improvement$308,000Public Safety & Disaster$300,000Civil Rights$235,000Other$195,000International$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetM F PLACE INC: $1,020,000 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetOASIS CENTER INC: $308,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetMALIBU FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetGender Spectrum Charitable Fund: $200,000 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetTHE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC: $165,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $159,023 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $135,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSEEDS OF PEACE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTRUE COLORS UNITED INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBeauty 2 The Streetz: $30,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF MIDDLE TN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC9.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Happy Hippie Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Happy Hippie Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Happy Hippie Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Happy Hippie Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Happy Hippie’s filings →

    More from the funding graph