Skip to content
Hannah & Robert Judelson Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Hannah & Robert Judelson Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$880
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$9kCivil Rights$6kHealth$3kRecreation & Sports$3kFood & Nutrition$3kPublic Benefit$2kArts & Culture$1kEducation$870Other$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$110
Median grant
4
States reached
$7k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN$880
ISLAND HARVEST$540
THE CONSERVATIVE SYNAGOGUE INC$360
ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION$360
KEITH HAYES FOUNDATION$360
LONG ISLAND CARES INC$180
THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$110
THE YOUNG MENS & YOUNG WOMENS HEBREW ASSOCIATION$100
LITTLE SHELTER ANIMAL ADOPTION CENTER INC$100
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC$100
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC$35
HAPPY CAT INC$28
UNICEF$25
HEWLETT-EAST ROCKAWAY JEWISH CENTRE$18
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ISLAND HARVEST: $540 → 7%Island Harvest: $180 → 7%ISLAND HARVEST: $150 → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $510 → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES: $460 → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES: $360 → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $180 → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES: $180 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
WI
NY
MA
SD
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
DC
HI
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$21k · 15 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
36

Total granted

$21k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
0%

Still filing today

60%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthEducationPhilanthropyCrime & LegalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED
    6× · 2017–2025 · $4k · revenue +45%
  • Civic Nation
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +132%
  • LI
    Long Island Cares Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $2k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • PG
    Pine Grove Memorial Park and Cemetery
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • NC
    New City Jewish Center
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
5
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
6
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
7
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
8
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
9
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
12
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Turtle Bay Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
16/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE SHALOM: $6,780 · OtherTEMPLE SHALOMPine Grove Memorial Park and Cemetery: $2,700 · OtherPine Grove Memorial Park and CemeteryMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center: $2,000 · OtherMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterIndividual grant recipient: $1,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNew City Jewish Center: $1,720 · OtherNew City Jewish CenterAmerican Civil Liberties Union: $1,165 · OtherAmerican Civil Liberties Union+31 more: $4,890 · Other+31 moreNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $3,839 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL COUN…Long Island Cares Inc: $1,690 · Human ServicesISLAND HARVEST LTD: $870 · Human ServicesCivic Nation: $2,000 · EducationREV GEORGE T RUFFOLO MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $300 · Education+1 more: $50 · EducationALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $360 · HealthBOULDER COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $360 · HealthCIRCLE OF CARE FOR FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WITH CANCER INC: $250 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $100 · HealthCENTER FOR DEAF-BLIND PERSONS INC: $50 · HealthBOUNCE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $50 · HealthWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $610 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $150 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $150 · International+4 more: $100 · InternationalMOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING: $180 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $135 · Crime & Legal
Other$21,055Community Improvement$3,839Human Services$2,560Education$2,350Health$1,170International$1,010Crime & Legal$315

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $3,839 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCivic Nation: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLong Island Cares Inc: $1,690 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetISLAND HARVEST LTD: $870 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $610 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOULDER COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREV GEORGE T RUFFOLO MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $274 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCIRCLE OF CARE FOR FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WITH CANCER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARL SAFINA CENTER INC THE SAFINA CENTER: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $135 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPINE TREE SOCIETY INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR DEAF-BLIND PERSONS INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAURI S BAUER FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOUNCE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH CONGRESS INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIVE TOWNS EARLY LEARNING CENTER INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURTLE BAY FOUNDATION: $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundMorgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Pfizer Foundation…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Paypal Charitable Giv…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…
Jewish Communal FundNY11.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hannah & Robert Judelson Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hannah & Robert Judelson Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hannah & Robert Judelson Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Hannah & Robert Judelson Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hannah & Robert Judelson’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home