Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hannah & Marvin Kamin Family Foundation Amy R Kamin & Margery G Kamin Trustees

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Health$162kEducation$120kReligion$62kPhilanthropy$50kHuman Services$11kArts & Culture$6kInternational$3kMembership Benefit$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH$10,000
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$10,000
PROJECT HEALTHY MINDS$2,000
WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART$1,000
THE PARRISH ART MUSEUM INC$1,000
HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF PALM BEACH COUNTY$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $10k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES: $250 → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES: $250 → 11%CARIAGE HOUSE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $250 → 11%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $36 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of Hannah & Marvin Kamin Family Foundation Amy R Kamin & Margery G Kamin Trustees’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Hannah & Marvin Kamin Family Foundation Amy R Kamin & Margery G Kamin Trusteeslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$271k · 9 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
25

Total granted

$271k
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+14%

Still filing today

67%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $150k · revenue +32%
  • TG
    The George Washington University
    6× · 2019–2024 · $77k · revenue +23%
  • WM
    WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • RS
    RODEF SHALOM CONGREGATION
    one grant, 2018 · $47k
  • FW
    Francis W Parker School
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +12%
  • SH
    STAFFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

2
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
3
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
4
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
5
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
6
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

7
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
8
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
9
University of Pittsburgh

The university of pittsburgh, founded in 1787, is one of the oldest institutions of higher education in the united states and one of the nation's top public research universities. for more than two centuries, the university of pittsburgh…

Education
10
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
11
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Association On Aging and the most unlike its peers is Whitney Museum of American Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%53%20–35yr13%1%35–55yr16%46%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,542

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC — $150,000 · HealthNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC+2 more — $2,600 · HealthThe George Washington University — $76,600 · EducationThe George Washington Universit…Francis W Parker School — $20,000 · EducationFrancis W Parker SchoolTHE BIRCH WATHEN LENOX SCHOOL — $16,500 · EducationTHE BIRCH WATHEN LENOX SCHOOL+2 more — $1,500 · EducationRODEF SHALOM CONGREGATION — $46,800 · OtherRODEF SHALOM CONGREGAT…RODEF SHALOM — $12,700 · OtherRODEF SHALOMSTAFFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · OtherSTAFFORD HOSPITAL FOUN…WINCHESTER THURSTON SCHOOL — $5,000 · OtherWINCHESTER THURSTON SC…WATERMILL CENTER — $3,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF PALM — $3,000 · Other+15 more — $6,400 · Other+15 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $50,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERA…JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING — $10,054 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH — $500 · Human Services+1 more — $250 · Human ServicesPROJECT HEALTHY MINDS — $2,000 · Arts & CultureWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $2,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PARRISH ART MUSEUM INC — $1,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $200 · Arts & Culture
Health$152,600Education$114,600Other$81,900Philanthropy$50,000Human Services$10,804Arts & Culture$5,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC — $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University — $76,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFrancis W Parker School — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BIRCH WATHEN LENOX SCHOOL — $16,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING — $10,054 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWINCHESTER THURSTON SCHOOL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF PALM — $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFOUNDCARE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HEALTHY MINDS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHATHAM UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PARRISH ART MUSEUM INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH CEMETERY & BURIAL ASSOC OF GR PGH — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCUNY SCHOOL OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARRIAGE HOUSE CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PITTSBURGH — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH RESIDENTIAL SERVICES INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Greater PittsburghPA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh · David S Shapira Foundation · Giant Eagle Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hannah & Marvin Kamin Family Foundation Amy R Kamin & Margery G Kamin Trustees funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • Foundcare Inc6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph