Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hall Martha Educational Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$267kScience & Tech$1k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$739k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$8,000
CEDARVILLE UNIVERSITY$7,000
GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY$5,000
WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY$5,000
CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$4,000
DIVERS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$3,000
COLUMBIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 19%EASTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $1k → 15%DIVERS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $1k → 9%ST MARTINS UNIVERSITY: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
OR
OH
RI
CA
VA
AZ
OK
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$286k · 25 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
11

Total granted

$286k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+37%

Still filing today

36%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    Cedarville University
    7× · 2019–2025 · $24k · revenue +61%
  • WU
    WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $21k · revenue +20%
  • CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2018–2024 · $18k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • LU
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +22%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
6
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
7
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
8
Nebraska Wesleyan University

Nebraska wesleyan university is an academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within the context of a liberal arts education and in an environment of christian concern.

Education
9
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
10
Calvin University

The mission of calvin university is to equip students to think deeply, to act justly, and to live wholeheartedly as christ's agents of renewal in the world.

Education
11
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
12
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Linfield University; the most unlike its peers is Northwest Nazarene University Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $56,887 · OtherEASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITYWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $49,077 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITYCENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $24,867 · OtherCENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $10,571 · OtherSPOKANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $9,674 · OtherOKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $8,853 · Other+18 more: $54,386 · Other+18 moreCedarville University: $23,501 · EducationCedarville UniversityWHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $21,366 · EducationWHITWORTH UNIVERSITYCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $17,645 · EducationCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSIT…Grand Canyon University: $5,986 · EducationGrand Canyon UniversityNORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY INC: $3,968 · EducationLIFE CHIROPRACTIC COLLEGE WEST: $3,755 · EducationCARROLL COLLEGE: $3,414 · Education+5 more: $8,003 · Education+5 moreBROWN UNIVERSITY: $986 · Community Improvement
Other$214,315Education$87,638Community Improvement$986

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCedarville University: $23,501 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $21,366 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $17,645 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGrand Canyon University: $5,986 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST UNIVERSITY: $4,954 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY INC: $3,968 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE CHIROPRACTIC COLLEGE WEST: $3,755 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARROLL COLLEGE: $3,414 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY: $2,276 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $2,215 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLinfield University: $1,540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $986 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVANGUARD UNIVERSITY OF SO CAL: $986 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE: $986 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Cedarville University ↗
  • Who funds WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Grand Canyon University ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE CHIROPRACTIC COLLEGE WEST ↗
  • Who funds CARROLL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Linfield University ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds VANGUARD UNIVERSITY OF SO CAL ↗
  • Who funds BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hall Martha Educational Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hall Martha Educational Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Linfield University: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hall Martha Educational’s filings →

More from the funding graph