Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Hall County Community Collaborative

To see safe, healthy and thriving communities and families

$259k
Granted FY2022
7
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192022.

Human Services$301kPhilanthropy$225kHealth$151kEducation$114kCrime & Legal$39kYouth Development$36kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2022 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $198k
$14,362
Median grant
1
States reached
$-47660
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEARTLAND UNITED WAY$100,682
GRAND ISLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS$97,622
CENTRAL NEBRASKA COUNCIL ON ALCOHOL$21,870
GRANTS UNDER 5000$14,362
ST MARY'S CATHEDRAL$12,238
YOUNG WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION$7,100
FAMILIES CARE INC$5,025
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $138k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA: $33k → 11%CENTRAL PLAINS CENTER FOR SERVICES: $60k → 11%FAMILIES CARE INC: $25k → 13%FAMILIES CARE INC: $8k → 13%FAMILIES CARE INC: $5k → 13%YOUNG WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$602k · 4 repeat orgs$302k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$602k
$269k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-10%
+58%

Still filing today

100%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHealthCrime & LegalEducationCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HU
    HEARTLAND UNITED WAY INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $376k · revenue -36%
  • GI
    GRAND ISLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $104k · revenue -17%
  • CN
    CENTRAL NEBRASKA COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND ADDICTIONS INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $84k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • CD
    CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2019 · $103k
  • CP
    CENTRAL PLAINS CENTER FOR SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $60k · revenue +58%
  • HC
    HEARTLAND CASA
    one grant, 2019 · $39k · revenue -17%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mid-Ozark Casa Program

The program provides organization structure, leadership and training for community volunteers who serve as court appointed special advocates(casa) for agbused and neglected children in south central missouri.

Community Improvement
2
Warrick County Casa Inc

To recruit volunteers to represent children

Crime & Legal
3
Southeast Nebraska Casa

Southeast Nebraska Casa recruits, trains and supports community volunteers who advocate forabused and neglected children in the Seward, Saline, Thayer, Jefferson and Gage County Court System

Crime & Legal
4
Casa Program of Howard County

Casa advocates for the best interest of abused and neglected children during court proceedings and recruits and trains volunteers fot this purpose.

Civil Rights
5
Nebraska Casa Association

The nebraska casa association partners with local casa programs to recruit and train volunteers who speak in court for the safety and well-being of abused and neglected children.

Crime & Legal
6
Casa of the Rolling Plains

Casa is a program to advocate for abused and neglected children in the legal and foster system.

Crime & Legal
7
Lasalle County Childrens Advocacy Center

Advocacy and care of physically and sexually abused children in lasalle county. we work with the court system in determining the best placement for children.

Crime & Legal
8
Sierra County Child Abuse Council

Child abuse awareness and prevention

Crime & Legal
9
Lincoln County Casa

The organization advocates, promotes, and supports court-appointed volunteer advocacy for abused and neglected children, striving to secure a permanent and safe home for each child.

Crime & Legal
10
Macon County Casa

Heartland casa advocates for the best interest of abused and neglected children who are in the custody of the state of illinois and under the protection of the macon and dewitt county courts.

11
Canadian County Casa Inc

Serve nbsp;as nbsp;court nbsp;appointed nbsp;special nbsp;advocates nbsp;for nbsp;abused nbsp;and nbsp;neglected nbsp;children nbsp;in nbsp;the nbsp;judicial nbsp;system

Crime & Legal
12
Casa of Johnson County Inc

Recruit and train community volunteers to speak out for abused and neglected children in court proceedings so that they can be permanently placed in a safe, nuturing enviroment as quickly as possible.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Families Care Inc and the most unlike its peers is Project Hunger. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HEARTLAND UNITED WAY INC — $376,095 · PhilanthropyHEARTLAND UNITED WAY INCCENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT — $102,641 · OtherCENTRAL DISTRICT HE…OTHER PAYMENTS UNDER 5000 EACH — $18,332 · OtherOTHER PAYMENTS UNDE…GRANTS UNDER 5000 — $14,362 · OtherGRANTS UNDER 5000CATHEDRAL OF THE NATIVITY OF THE BLESSED VIRGIN MARY — $12,238 · OtherCATHEDRAL OF THE NA…GRAND ISLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $10,000 · OtherGRAND ISLAND PUBLIC…CENTRAL PLAINS CENTER FOR SERVICES — $59,896 · Human ServicesCENTRAL PLAINS CE…FAMILIES CARE INC — $37,325 · Human ServicesFAMILIES CARE INCCASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA — $33,495 · Human ServicesCASA OF SOUTH CEN…GRAND ISLAND YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $7,100 · Human ServicesGRAND ISLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $103,789 · EducationGRAND ISLAND …CENTRAL NEBRASKA COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND ADDICTIONS INC — $84,338 · HealthCENTRAL NE…HEARTLAND CASA — $38,866 · Crime & LegalPROJECT HUNGER — $5,476 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$376,095Other$157,573Human Services$137,816Education$103,789Health$84,338Crime & Legal$38,866Community Improvement$5,476

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHEARTLAND UNITED WAY INC — $376,095 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetGRAND ISLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $103,789 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetCENTRAL NEBRASKA COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND ADDICTIONS INC — $84,338 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetCENTRAL PLAINS CENTER FOR SERVICES — $59,896 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetHEARTLAND CASA — $38,866 over 1y, 14% of budgetFAMILIES CARE INC — $37,325 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetGRAND ISLAND YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $7,100 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sn Bud and Gloria Wolbach Charitable FoundatiNE15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sn Bud and Gloria Wolbach Charitable Foundati · Greater Grand Island Community Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hall County Community Collaborative funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hall County Community Collaborative?

    Find your warmest path to Hall County Community Collaborative through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph