Skip to content

· Private foundation

Halff Windham Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$704k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$699kEducation$315kCivil Rights$204kFood & Nutrition$90kHuman Services$38kHousing & Shelter$30kInternational$5kHealth$2k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $678k
$100,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAYARD RUSTIN CENTER FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE$200,000
METROPOLITAN OPERA ASSOCIATION INC$100,000
METROPOLITAN OPERA ASSOCIATION INC$100,000
EARLHAM COLLEGE$100,000
WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS$100,000
JAZZ AT PRIDE INC$78,200
JAZZ AT PRIDE INC$20,300
CENTRAL CONNECTICUT COAST YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CENTRAL CONNECTICUT COAST YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASS: $10k → 12%CENTRAL CONNECTICUT COAST YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASS: $8k → 12%CENTRAL CONNECTICUT COAST YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASS: $5k → 12%CENTRAL CONNECTICUT COAST YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASS: $5k → 12%CENTRAL CONNECTICUT COAST YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASS: $5k → 12%CENTRAL CONNECTICUT COAST YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASS: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
OR
IN
NJ
CT
CA
VA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Halff Windham Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Halff Windham Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$959k · 7 repeat orgs$424k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$959k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+28%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $399k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCivil RightsEducationHousing & ShelterEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Metropolitan Opera Association Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $500k · revenue +0%
  • EC
    Earlham College Inc
    3× · 2022–2025 · $305k · revenue +57%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $80k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • FC
    Foodwise Communitygraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +28%
  • LI
    LIFEWATER INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -93%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
2
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
3
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
4
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
5
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
6
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

—
7
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
8
Aclu Foundation of Massachusetts Inc

Aclu foundation of ma was established to defend freedoms guaranteed in the constitution and bill of rights through public education and litigation.

Civil Rights
9
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
10
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
11
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
12
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wolf Trap Foundation for the Performing Arts; the most unlike its peers is Bayard Rustin Center for Social Justice. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Metropolitan Opera Association Inc: $500,000 · Arts & CultureMetropolitan Opera Association IncWOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $100,000 · Arts & CultureWOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTSJAZZ AT PRIDE INC: $98,500 · Arts & CultureJAZZ AT PRIDE INCEarlham College Inc: $305,000 · EducationEarlham College IncBAYARD RUSTIN CENTER FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE: $200,000 · Civil RightsBAYARD RUSTIN CE…+1 more: $4,000 · Civil RightsMEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherFoodwise Community: $10,000 · OtherCENTRAL CONNECTICUT COAST YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $37,500 · Human ServicesTENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterLIFEWATER INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $2,000 · Health
Arts & Culture$698,500Education$305,000Civil Rights$204,000Other$100,000Human Services$37,500Housing & Shelter$30,000Environment$5,000Health$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMetropolitan Opera Association Inc: $500,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEarlham College Inc: $305,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBAYARD RUSTIN CENTER FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE: $200,000 over 1y, 57% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $80,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL CONNECTICUT COAST YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $37,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFoodwise Community: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLIFEWATER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY11.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Halff Windham Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Halff Windham Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Central Connecticut Coast Young Men's Christian Association Inc: 14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Halff Windham’s filings →

More from the funding graph