Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hakim Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
77
Grants FY2024still arriving
23
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

International$767kReligion$245kFood & Nutrition$80kEducation$65kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kPhilanthropy$40kCivil Rights$35kScience & Tech$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 77 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $85k
  • $10k–50k55 grants · $695k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $250k
$10,000
Median grant
23
States reached
$711k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UN WFP CONTACT KAREN TURNEY$50,000
UNRWA-USA UNITED NATIONS RELIEF AND WORKS AGENCY$50,000
USA FOR UNHCR CONTACT DAVID HALL$50,000
UNRWA-USA UNITED NATIONS RELIEF AND WORKS AGENCY$50,000
UNICEF USA ATTN AMY HARRELL$50,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$30,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY OFFICE OF INDIVIDUAL GIVING ATTN SA$30,000
EMMANUEL COLLEGE ATTN BRIAN DENNING$25,000
OLV CHARITIES$20,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE$20,000
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$20,000
MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL$20,000
OLV CHARITIES$20,000
INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS FILE 2156$20,000
MAP INTERNATIONAL (MEDICINE FOR THE WORLD)$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY OFFICE OF INDIVIDUAL GIVING ATTN SA: $30k → 8%EMMANUEL COLLEGE ATTN BRIAN DENNING: $25k → 16%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $10k → 12%AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE: $20k → 22%AID FOR STARVING CHILDREN: $10k → 9%INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $10k → 14%SALESIAN MISSIONS: $10k → 9%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $10k → 11%CATHOLIC MEDICAL BOARD: $10k → 13%OLV CHARITIES: $20k → 13%UNICEF USA: $50k → 17%AID TO THE CHURCH IN NEED: $10k → 20%MERCY SHIPS: $15k → 12%FEED THE CHILDREN: $10k → 16%USA FOR UNHCR: $50k → 14%UNTO: $10k → 13%FRANCISCAN MISSIONS: $10k → 10%MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 12%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $10k → 9%ST HENRY CHURCH: $15k → 14%THE CARTER CENTER: $10k → 14%MAP INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 14%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $10k → 22%SISTERS OF ST BENEDICT: $10k → 8%FEED THE HUNGRY: $10k → 13%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $10k → 6%WORLD VILLAGES FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 11%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $20k → 19%INTERNATIONAL CATHOLIC MIGRATION COMMISSION: $10k → 16%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $10k → 12%AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE: $10k → 22%SALESIAN MISSIONS: $10k → 9%OLV CHARITIES: $20k → 13%UNICEF USA ATTN AMY HARRELL: $50k → 17%AID TO THE CHURCH IN NEED: $10k → 20%MERCY SHIPS: $10k → 12%FEED THE CHILDREN: $10k → 16%ICMC INC: $10k → 14%FRANCISCAN MISSIONS GENERAL SECRETERIAL OF THE FRANCISCAN MISSION: $10k → 10%MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 12%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $10k → 9%ST HENRY CHURCH: $10k → 14%THE CARTER CENTER: $10k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC: $20k → 17%USA FOR UNHCR CONTACT DAVID HALL: $50k → 14%UNRWA-USA UNITED NATIONS RELIEF AND WORKS AGENCY: $50k → 14%UN WFP: $50k → 14%UNRWA-USA UNITED NATIONS RELIEF AND WORKS AGENCY: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
PA
CT
CA
NE
KY
VA
MD
TN
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

21%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$307k · 13 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 45 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
11

Total granted

$307k
$255k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%
+1%

Still filing today

69%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $865k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
InternationalReligionHealthEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $52k · revenue +13%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +0%
  • TC
    THE CARTER CENTER INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +1%
  • United States Association for UNHCR
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -35%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
MedGlobal Inc

MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…

Health
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
4
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International
5
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
6
International Relief Teams

International relief teams is a non-profit international relief and development organization dedicated to allieviating human suffering by providing critical assistance to victims of disaster, profound poverty and neglect worldwide

International
7
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
8
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
9
Mercy Corps

Our mission is to alleviate suffering, poverty and oppression by helping people build secure, productive and just communities.

International
10
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
11
The One Campaign

The ONE Campaign ("ONE") continued its work to educate and raise awareness among the public, media and policymakers around the world about the importance of official development assistance and international programs that (Continued on…

Unclassified
12
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Medical Mission Board Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
13/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNRWA-USA UNITED NATIONS RELIEF AND WORKS AGENCY: $100,000 · OtherUNRWA-USA UNITED NATIONS RELIEF AND WORKS AGENCYUNICEF USA ATTN AMY HARRELL: $50,000 · OtherUNICEF USA ATTN AMY HARRELLUSA FOR UNHCR CONTACT DAVID HALL: $50,000 · OtherUSA FOR UNHCR CONTACT DAVID HALLUN WFP CONTACT KAREN TURNEY: $50,000 · OtherUN WFP CONTACT KAREN TURNEYIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOLV CHARITIES: $40,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $40,000 · Other+37 more: $525,000 · Other+37 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $51,700 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $50,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFUnited States Association for UNHCR: $50,000 · InternationalUnited States Association for UNHC…COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $30,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND REL…MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $30,000 · InternationalMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONALMercy Ships International: $25,000 · InternationalMercy Ships InternationalMAP International Inc: $20,000 · InternationalAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $20,000 · InternationalFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $20,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $20,000 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $20,000 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $20,000 · International+7 more: $65,000 · International+7 morePARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $20,000 · HealthSYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthSupport Our Aging Religious Inc: $20,000 · ReligionWorld Help: $5,000 · ReligionLESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyRensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $10,000 · Education
Other$905,000International$441,700Health$40,000Religion$25,000Philanthropy$15,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $51,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAP International Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSupport Our Aging Religious Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAID FOR STARVING CHILDREN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWorld Help: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds MAP International Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Support Our Aging Religious Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds SYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lourdes Mercy FoundationNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lourdes Mercy Foundation · James J Capone Charitable Foundati · B & R Charitable Foundation Inc · Farrell Family Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hakim Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hakim Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Medical Teams International: 14% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hakim Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph