Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

Hacks Hackers

The organization exists to bring together journalists (hacks) and technologists (hackers) who are leaders in their sectors to advance media innovation and foster public trust in the information ecosystem. We do that by a)convening summits, hackathons, ideathons and workshopsthat bring together talent from cross-disciplinary backgrounds,…

$1.1M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
7
Itemized grants FY2024
9
Organizations funded FY2023
44%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$1.1M
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$45,146
Largest grant, FY2024
$723,688
Organizations funded a year
1 to 9
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
7
Total assets, FY2024
$1.1M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 44% of the organizations Hacks Hackers funded were first-time grantees, receiving 27% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $284k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationHealthHuman ServicesSocial ScienceScience & TechArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving7$1.1M57%
FY20239$1.0M44%
FY20224$244k75%
FY20212$285k50%
FY20208$122k75%
FY20194$201k75%
FY20181$11k100%
FY20171$35kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.6MScience & Tech$522kHealth$246kSocial Science$220kArts & Culture$179kCommunity Improvement$125kPublic Benefit$108k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
NV
PA
CA
MD
DE
DC
GA

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of Washington$1,427,7074n/a
Knowledge Futures Inc$223,250214%
Social Science Research Council$220,11131%
Colab Inc$200,0002n/a
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia$186,22110%
Meedan Inc$138,12833%
Codingscape$111,8631n/a
Discourse Labs Inc$100,2001100%
Georgia Institute of Technology$77,4552n/a
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College$50,00010%
Show all 23 grantees
All grantees of Hacks Hackers by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of Washington$1,427,7074n/a
Knowledge Futures Inc$223,250214%
Social Science Research Council$220,11131%
Colab Inc$200,0002n/a
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia$186,22110%
Meedan Inc$138,12833%
Codingscape$111,8631n/a
Discourse Labs Inc$100,2001100%
Georgia Institute of Technology$77,4552n/a
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College$50,00010%
The George Washington University$50,00010%
Hintsai$50,0001n/a
Wikimedia Foundation Inc$32,97630%
Hacks Hackers$26,00011%
Marvelous Inc$26,0002n/a
National Public Health Information Coalition Inc$15,00012%
Mozilla Foundation$11,37310%
Plympton$11,3161n/a
Hexlabs Inc$10,00018%
Art Feminism Inc$9,00014%
Muckrock Foundation Inc$7,50010%
Kensho Technologies$7,2001n/a
Wiki Society of Washington DC Inc$5,50014%

Where it is load-bearing

Hacks Hackers supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 15 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKnowledge Futures Inc: $223,250 over 2y, 14% of budgetSocial Science Research Council: $220,111 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia: $186,221 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMeedan Inc: $138,128 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetDiscourse Labs Inc: $100,200 over 1y, 100% of budgetPresident-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWikimedia Foundation Inc: $32,976 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHacks Hackers: $26,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNational Public Health Information Coalition Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetMozilla Foundation: $11,373 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHexlabs Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetArt Feminism Inc: $9,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetMuckrock Foundation Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWiki Society of Washington DC Inc: $5,500 over 1y, 3.8% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 15.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John S and James L Knight FoundationFL15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John S and James L Knight Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Hacks Hackers with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hacks Hackers?

Find your warmest path to Hacks Hackers through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Hacks Hackers

How much does Hacks Hackers give?
Hacks Hackers reported 7 itemized grants totaling $1,053,224, out of $1,078,336 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 9 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Hacks Hackers fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (53%), Science & Tech (17%), Health (8%).
Who are Hacks Hackers's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: University of Washington ($1.4M), Knowledge Futures Inc ($223k), Social Science Research Council ($220k).
Does Hacks Hackers fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 44% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Hacks Hackers?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include John S and James L Knight Foundation, The Ford Foundation, Silicon Valley Community Foundation.
Where is Hacks Hackers based?
Hacks Hackers is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hacks Hackers’ filings →

More from the funding graph