Skip to content
Habitat for Humanity of Oregon Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Habitat for Humanity of Oregon Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

$949k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$297k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$3.7M
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $927,809, the rows itemized in this filing. The $948,927 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $21,118 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $189k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $434k
  • $250k+1 grant · $297k
$46,694
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEST TUALITY HFH$297,197
LA PINESUNRIVER$141,025
NEWBERG AREA HFH$135,592
NORTH WILLAMETTE VALLEY HFH$82,602
SISTERS HFH$75,233
PORTLANDMETRO EAST HFH$48,587
LINCOLN COUNTY HFH$46,694
GRANTS PASS HFH$25,509
COLUMBIA COUNTY HFH$25,382
GRANDE RONDE VALLEY HFH$16,814
BEND AREA HFH$15,287
TILLAMOOK COUNTY HFH$10,868
ROGUE VALLEY HFH$7,019
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WILLAMETTE WEST HFH: $19k → 8%LA PINESUNRIVER: $141k → 10%NEWBERG AREA HFH: $136k → 11%COLUMBIA COUNTY HFH: $152k → 11%TILLAMOOK COUNTY HFH: $78k → 12%PORTLANDMETRO EAST HFH: $401k → 12%ROGUE VALLEY HFH: $50k → 13%SISTERS HFH: $75k → 13%NORTH WILLAMETTE VALLEY HFH: $145k → 14%GRANDE RONDE VALLEY HFH: $37k → 15%CENTRAL LANE HFH: $17k → 15%LINCOLN COUNTY HFH: $47k → 16%COLUMBIA GORGE HFH: $117k → 16%LA PINESUNRIVER: $59k → 10%NEWBERG AREA HFH: $44k → 11%COLUMBIA COUNTY HFH: $25k → 11%TILLAMOOK COUNTY HFH: $38k → 12%PORTLANDMETRO EAST HFH: $187k → 12%ROGUE VALLEY HFH: $29k → 13%SISTERS HFH: $25k → 13%NORTH WILLAMETTE VALLEY HFH: $83k → 14%GRANDE RONDE VALLEY HFH: $17k → 15%CENTRAL LANE HFH: $16k → 15%LA PINESUNRIVER: $39k → 10%COLUMBIA COUNTY HFH: $16k → 11%TILLAMOOK COUNTY HFH: $16k → 12%PORTLANDMETRO EAST HFH: $49k → 12%NORTH WILLAMETTE VALLEY HFH: $53k → 14%LA PINESUNRIVER: $34k → 10%PORTLANDMETRO EAST HFH: $44k → 12%WEST TUALITY HFH: $297k → 8%LA PINESUNRIVER: $31k → 10%PORTLANDMETRO EAST HFH: $30k → 12%MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY HFH: $146k → 14%WEST TUALITY HFH: $44k → 8%LA PINESUNRIVER: $26k → 10%PORTLANDMETRO EAST HFH: $30k → 12%MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY HFH: $55k → 14%WEST TUALITY HFH: $26k → 8%NEWBERRY HFH: $21k → 10%PORTLANDMETRO EAST HFH: $30k → 12%MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY HFH: $23k → 14%MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY HFH: $20k → 14%BEND AREA HFH: $27k → 10%JUNCTION CITYHARRISBURG HFH: $75k → 15%BEND AREA HFH: $24k → 10%JUNCTION CITYHARRISBURG HFH: $16k → 15%BEND AREA HFH: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 21 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
2

Total granted

$3.6M
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+88%
+219%

Still filing today

95%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST
    8× · 2017–2025 · $776k · revenue +58%
  • WT
    West Tuality Habitat for Humanity
    7× · 2019–2025 · $405k · revenue +170%
  • HF
    Habitat for Humanity of La Pine Sunriver
    9× · 2017–2025 · $363k · revenue +345%

Funded once

  • MA
    MCMINNVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $16k · revenue +219%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL ALBANY AREAgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue +37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat Community Housing Development Inc

Development of affordable housing

—
2
Habitat for Humanity of the San Juans

Provide affordable housing to the disadvantaged

Housing & Shelter
3
Habitat for Humanity International Inc

To put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.

—
4
Habitat for Humanity of West Central Mn

Helping families thrive through affordable homeownership.

—
5
Habitat for Humanity of Waukesha County Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action. habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
6
Habitat for Humanity International Scotts Bluff County

Most construction work is performed by volunteers

—
7
Habitat for Humanity International Wabash County Hfh

Wabash county habitat for humanity, inc. is a non-profit organization working in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to build decent, affordable housing.

—
8
Habitat for Humanity International Inc

Seeking to put gods love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
9
Habitat for Humanity of Central Arkansas Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
10
Habitat for Humanity International Yakima Valley Partners Hfh

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.

—
11
Habitat for Humanity International Ponca City Area

Provide decent housing to needy families at an affordable amount. the homes are sold based on monthly, interest-free payments over 30 years.

—
12
Habitat for Humanity of Dekalb County

The mission is to unite people to provide decent and affordable housing for families in need

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity Mt Angel Area Inc; the most unlike its peers is Umpqua Valley Habitat for Humanity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
19/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

West Tuality Habitat for Humanity: $405,218 · OtherWest Tuality Habitat for HumanityHabitat for Humanity of La Pine Sunriver: $362,772 · OtherHabitat for Humanity of La Pine SunriverHABITAT FOR HUMANITY MT ANGEL AREA INC: $287,393 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY MT ANGEL AREA INCHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY: $264,839 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEYColumbia County Habitat for Humanity: $204,380 · OtherColumbia County Habitat for HumanityNEWBERG AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $191,861 · OtherNEWBERG AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITYTILLAMOOK COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $170,596 · OtherTILLAMOOK COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITYSISTERS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $111,272 · OtherBENTON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $87,149 · Other+9 more: $315,174 · Other+9 moreHABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST: $775,612 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAS…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ROGUE VALLEY: $141,466 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ROGUE VALLEYCOLUMBIA GORGE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $140,388 · Housing & ShelterCOLUMBIA GORGE HABITAT FOR HUMANITYBend-Redmond Habitat for Humanity: $132,754 · Housing & ShelterBend-Redmond Habitat for HumanityHOUSING OPPORTUNITIES MADE EQUAL: $99,172 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING OPPORTUNITIES MADE EQUAL+1 more: $5,859 · Housing & Shelter
Other$2,400,654Housing & Shelter$1,295,251

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST: $775,612 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetWest Tuality Habitat for Humanity: $405,218 over 7y, 11% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of La Pine Sunriver: $362,772 over 9y, 10% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY MT ANGEL AREA INC: $287,393 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY: $264,839 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetColumbia County Habitat for Humanity: $204,380 over 5y, 13% of budgetNEWBERG AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $191,861 over 4y, 19% of budgetTILLAMOOK COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $170,596 over 7y, 10% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ROGUE VALLEY: $141,466 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetCOLUMBIA GORGE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $140,388 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetBend-Redmond Habitat for Humanity: $132,754 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetSISTERS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $111,272 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetHOUSING OPPORTUNITIES MADE EQUAL: $99,172 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetBENTON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $87,149 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CENTRAL LANE: $70,735 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $59,898 over 3y, 23% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY LINCOLN COUNTY: $46,694 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetWILLAMETTE WEST HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $45,351 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetJOSEPHINE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $34,007 over 2y, 11% of budgetFLORENCE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $18,395 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMCMINNVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $15,698 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetUMPQUA VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $13,570 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetCOOS COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $10,826 over 2y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Habitat for Humanity …Oregon Association of…The Oregon Community …Umpqua Bank Charitabl…Meyer Memorial TrustThe Autzen FoundationFirst Interstate Banc…The Ford Family Found…Washington Federal Fo…Marie Lamfrom Charita…American Endowment Fo…The Bank of America C…
Habitat for Humanity International IncGA51.1× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Habitat for Humanity International Inc · Oregon Association of Realtors Home Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Autzen Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Ford Family Foundation · Washington Federal Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Habitat for Humanity of Oregon Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Habitat for Humanity of Oregon Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 38%
  • Habitat for Humanity Portland Metro East: 38% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Habitat for Humanity of Oregon’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home