Skip to content

· Private foundation

H H and Edna Houseman Charitable Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$532k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$1.2MHealth$734kCrime & Legal$185kEducation$180kYouth Development$152kPublic Safety & Disaster$145kArts & Culture$84kReligion$42kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $265k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $190k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GARLYN PLACE$110,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHEAST$80,000
UNITED CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER OF$39,750
ORANGE CHRISTIAN SERVICES INC$30,000
CASA OF THE SABINE NECHES REGION$30,000
RAPE & SUICIDE CRISIS CENTER OF$25,000
BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES$20,100
SALVATION ARMY - ORANGE$20,000
FISHERS OF MEN MINISTRIES$20,000
JULIE ROGERS GIFT OF LIFE PROGRAM$20,000
VIDOR ROTARY CLUB$15,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC$10,000
SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER OF SE TX$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $327k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $29k → 19%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 19%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 19%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 19%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 19%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $14k → 19%NEHEMIAH'S VISION INC: $5k → 14%ORANGE CHRISTIAN SERVICES INC: $40k → 14%HOSPICE CARE TEAM INC: $6k → 19%HOSPICE CARE TEAM INC: $6k → 19%ORANGE CHRISTIAN SERVICES INC: $30k → 14%HOSPICE CARE TEAM INC: $6k → 19%ORANGE CHRISTIAN SERVICES INC: $30k → 14%HOSPICE CARE TEAM INC: $6k → 19%ORANGE CHRISTIAN SERVICES INC: $30k → 14%ORANGE CHRISTIAN SERVICES INC: $30k → 14%ORANGE CHRISTIAN SERVICES INC: $30k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 26 repeat orgs$825k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
22

Total granted

$2.4M
$664k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
-4%

Still filing today

46%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $161k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    ORANGE CHRISTIAN SERVICES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $190k · revenue +31%
  • JR
    Julie Rogers Gift of Life Program
    6× · 2020–2025 · $120k · revenue +49%
  • S
    Stable-Spirit
    6× · 2020–2025 · $56k · revenue +133%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $420k
  • CH
    CHRISTUS HEALTH FOUNDATION OF
    one grant, 2023 · $55k
  • SM
    ST MARY CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $28k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
HealthTexas Provider Network

To deliver the highest value patient experience through quality, safety, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, enhanced by medical education and research in collaboration with Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
2
Baylor Regional Medical Center at Grapevine

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
3
South Texas Rural Health Services

South Texas Rural Health Services, Inc. provides charitable health services, including the recruitment of health care personnel to the rural service area, and primarily serves the low income population.

Health
4
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services
5
Behavioral Health Solutions of South Texas

To develop and implement effective age-appropriate, consumer-driven, evidence-based services to prevent and reduce substance use and strengthen mental wellness across the southernmost Texas communities.

Human Services
6
Scott & White Hospital-College Station

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
7
Texas Non-Profit Hospice Alliance

The Texas Nonprofit Hospice Alliance (TNPHA) is a group of nonprofit hospices dedicated to sharing best practices and providing quality care for individuals with life-limiting illnesses.

Human Services
8
Texas Palliative Care

Texas palliative care operates to strengthen and further the goals and purpose of hospice of east texas, a texas non-profit corporation.

Health
9
Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas

The mission of Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas is to perform sacred work by uniting kindness, quality, and healing through the provision of health care services to the community.

Health
10
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
11
Carter BloodCare

Carter bloodcare saves lives by making transfusion possible.

Health
12
South Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Crisis pregnancy counseling.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Buckner Children & Family Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Garlyn Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
9/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHEAST: $480,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHEASTIndividual grant recipient: $420,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITED CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER OF: $243,400 · OtherUNITED CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER OFRAPE & SUICIDE CRISIS CENTER OF: $147,500 · OtherRAPE & SUICIDE CRISIS CENTER OFAMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $140,000 · OtherAMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSSVIDOR INDEPENDENT SCHOOL: $130,000 · OtherVIDOR INDEPENDENT SCHOOLTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH: $125,000 · Other+37 more: $679,148 · Other+37 moreORANGE CHRISTIAN SERVICES INC: $190,000 · Human ServicesORANGE CHRISTIA…GARLYN PLACE: $110,000 · Human ServicesGARLYN PLACEBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $107,650 · Human ServicesBUCKNER CHILDRE…HOSPICE CARE TEAM INC: $24,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE CARE TE…+2 more: $17,500 · Human ServicesJulie Rogers Gift of Life Program: $120,000 · HealthStable-Spirit: $55,920 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 · Health+1 more: $4,945 · HealthADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN INC CASA OF THE SABINE NECHES REGION: $175,000 · Civil RightsGirl Scouts of San Jacinto Council: $51,000 · Youth DevelopmentORANGE COUNTY SPECIAL ANGELS RODEO: $7,200 · Youth DevelopmentCRIME STOPPERS OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC: $5,000 · Crime & LegalEMBRACING FREEDOM MINISTRY: $5,000 · Crime & LegalSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterBUCKNER RETIREMENT SERVICES INC: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$2,365,048Human Services$449,150Health$190,865Civil Rights$175,000Youth Development$58,200Crime & Legal$10,000Housing & Shelter$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetORANGE CHRISTIAN SERVICES INC: $190,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN INC CASA OF THE SABINE NECHES REGION: $175,000 over 6y, 7.0% of budgetJulie Rogers Gift of Life Program: $120,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetGARLYN PLACE: $110,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $107,650 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetStable-Spirit: $55,920 over 6y, 6.8% of budgetGirl Scouts of San Jacinto Council: $51,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBig Thicket Association: $27,000 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetSamaritan Counseling Center: $25,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetHOSPICE CARE TEAM INC: $24,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - THREE RIVERS COUNCIL: $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSoutheast Texas Food Bank Inc: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSYMPHONY OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORANGE COUNTY SPECIAL ANGELS RODEO: $7,200 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetCRIME STOPPERS OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEHEMIAH'S VISION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBUCKNER RETIREMENT SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEAUMONT PETS ALIVE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEMBRACING FREEDOM MINISTRY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLITTLE CYPRESS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHope Center for Crisis Pregnancy dba Hope Womens Resource Clinic: $4,945 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ROSE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ORANGE CHRISTIAN SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN INC CASA OF THE SABINE NECHES REGION ↗
  • Who funds Julie Rogers Gift of Life Program ↗
  • Who funds GARLYN PLACE ↗
  • Who funds BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Stable-Spirit ↗
  • Who funds Girl Scouts of San Jacinto Council ↗
  • Who funds Big Thicket Association ↗
  • Who funds Samaritan Counseling Center ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE CARE TEAM INC ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - THREE RIVERS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Southeast Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds SYMPHONY OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY SPECIAL ANGELS RODEO ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST TEXAS ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mamie McFaddin Ward Heritage FoundationTX26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mamie McFaddin Ward Heritage Foundation · Foundation for Southeast Texas Inc · B a and E W Steinhagen Benevolent Trust · Mechia Foundation · Young Mens Business League of Beaumont · He and Kate Dishman Charitable Trust · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation · United Way of Orange County Inc · Wilton and Effie Hebert Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization H H and Edna Houseman Charitable Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from H H and Edna Houseman Charitable Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on H H and Edna Houseman Charitable Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph