Skip to content

· Private foundation

H D Smith Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.7M
Granted FY2021
9
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$2.3M
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2021.

Education$8.1MArts & Culture$760kHuman Services$300kHealth$152kPhilanthropy$95kYouth Development$36kPublic Benefit$35kReligion$31kOther$0
02FY2021 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.5M
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION$2,261,905
DANA-THOMAS HOUSE FOUNDATION$251,524
YMCA OF SPRINGFIELD$100,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION- LAND OF LINCOLN$25,000
FREEDOMS FOUNDATION$10,000
AMIGOS EN CRISTO INC$10,000
MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$10,000
KBHOOPS$7,500
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%ARABIAN WORLD PARTNERSHIP: $12k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $100 → 17%SHRINERS HOSPITAL - CINCINATTI: $100 → 16%KBHOOPS: $9k → 7%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCATION: $10k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $2.3M → 19%SIU FOUNDATION: $5k → 23%KBHOOPS: $8k → 7%SPRINGFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $100 → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $2.3M → 19%SIU FOUNDATION SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $5k → 23%KBHOOPS: $8k → 7%WASHINGTON STREET MISSION: $100 → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $1.8M → 19%CHATHAM FOOD PANTRY: $100 → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $1.8M → 19%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION- LAND OF LINCOLN: $55k → 11%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION- LAND OF LINCOLN: $25k → 11%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $8k → 11%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION- LAND OF LINCOLN: $8k → 11%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION- LAND OF LINCOLN: $8k → 11%DANA-THOMAS HOUSE FOUNDATION: $255k → 11%DANA-THOMAS HOUSE FOUNDATION: $254k → 11%DANA-THOMAS HOUSE FOUNDATION: $252k → 11%YMCA OF SPRINGFIELD: $100k → 11%YMCA OF SPRINGFIELD: $100k → 11%YMCA OF SPRINGFIELD: $100k → 11%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $36k → 11%MARY BRYANT HOME FOR THE BLIND: $2k → 11%CROP WORLD HUNGER: $500 → 11%CROP WORLD HUNGER: $500 → 11%AMIGOS EN CRISTO INC: $10k → 11%AMIGOS EN CRISTO INC: $10k → 11%CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.5M · 10 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2021, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
13

Total granted

$9.5M
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+125%

Still filing today

60%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21
EducationInternationalHealthFood & NutritionArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Illinois Foundation
    4× · 2018–2021 · $8.1M · revenue +49%
  • DH
    DANA-THOMAS HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $760k · revenue +176%
  • AE
    AMIGOS EN CRISTO MINISTRIES
    2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ILLINOISgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $36k · revenue +212%
  • AW
    ARABIAN WORLD PARTNERSHIPgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $12k · revenue ×11
  • AH
    AMERICAN HEART ASSOCATION
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern Illinois Community Foundation

To foster and encourage private philanthropic giving to improve communities of the Southern Illinois Region by connecting charitable donors with worthy causes and to build endowment funds that will support those worthy causes in perpetuity.

Philanthropy
2
Chicago Jewish Day School Endowment Foundation

The foundation was established exclusively for the benefit of and to carry out the purposes of the chicago jewish day school.

Education
3
Childrens Hospital of Illinois Medical Group

To support the mission of osf healthcare system, a catholic integrated health care delivery system, through the provision of quality health care services related to comprehensive inpatient and outpatient care for children.

—
4
Community Shares of Illinois

Community shares of illinois represents a diverse group of charitites with a common mission, to make our world a better place. whether your passion is women's issues, protecting children, helping animals, promoting health care or curbing…

—
5
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
6
Franciscan Sisters of Chicago Service Corporation

The mission of the franciscan sisters of chicago service corporation ("fscsc") is to celebrate life and serve with joy. (continued on schedule o).

Philanthropy
7
Solomon Schechter Endowment Foundation

The foundation was organized exclusively for the benefit of and to carry out the purposes of the solomon schechter day school.

Education
8
First Congregational Church of Madison Foundation Inc

Support Christian activities of First Congregational United Church of Christ in Madison, WI and administer dedicated funds such as scholarship bequests.

Religion
9
Foundation for Springfield Public Schools

The Foundation was formed to be a vehicle to receive, manage, and distribute all private donations, restricted and unrestricted, for the benefit of the School District of Springfield R-12, Springfield, Missouri.

Health
10
Springfield Area Collegiate Ministr

We believe in creating a space where students can have authentic encounters with christ, find life-long friends and get plugged in with a local church while they are in college.

Religion
11
Catholic Community Foundation

The purpose of the foundation is to support financially the spiritual, educational and other charitable needs of the catholic community by providing opportunities for people to fund causes consonant with the mission of the diocese of…

Religion
12
Wisconsin Foundation United Church of Christ Inc

Wisconsin foundation united church of christ, inc. is a catalyst for positive change in the life of the united church of christ in wisconsin; promotes a culture of generosity; and connects people across the ucc in working for a more just…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Men's Christian Association of Springfield; the most unlike its peers is Ball Chatham Food Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Illinois Foundation: $8,079,266 · EducationUniversity of Illinois FoundationDANA-THOMAS HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $759,923 · Arts & CultureDANA-THOM…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SPRINGFIELD: $300,000 · OtherMEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $140,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION- LAND OF LINCOLN: $95,000 · OtherFREEDOMS FOUNDATION AT VALLEY FORGE: $35,000 · OtherKBHOOPS: $24,000 · Other+12 more: $33,900 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $36,000 · Youth DevelopmentAMIGOS EN CRISTO MINISTRIES: $20,000 · ReligionARABIAN WORLD PARTNERSHIP: $12,000 · PhilanthropyCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $1,000 · International
Education$8,079,266Arts & Culture$759,923Other$627,900Youth Development$36,000Religion$20,000Philanthropy$12,000International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $8,079,266 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetDANA-THOMAS HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $759,923 over 3y, 23% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SPRINGFIELD: $300,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $36,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetFREEDOMS FOUNDATION AT VALLEY FORGE: $35,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetAMIGOS EN CRISTO MINISTRIES: $20,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetARABIAN WORLD PARTNERSHIP: $12,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpringfield Public Schools Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON STREET MISSION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Levi Ray & Shoup FoundationIL17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Levi Ray & Shoup Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization H D Smith Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from H D Smith Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to H D Smith Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to H D Smith Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on H D Smith’s filings →

    More from the funding graph